The Busine$$ of Football

Obama Thought$

There sure seems to be a lot of discussion about a rush to get contracts done in the remaining 8 weeks of 2008 to avoid the tax burden of the Obama administration.  I suppose there is some merit to this discussion, due to the fact that a few percentage points of tax burden could mean a lot of money depending on the amount of these contracts.  And, in light of the purported sale of the remaining shares of the Dolphins by Wayne Huizenga prior to the end of the year to lessen his capital gains hit, there are certainly tax planning measures already going on to protect large assets such as sales of sports teams.

And yes, there will be impacts.  According to the Arizona Republic, the Heritage Foundation crunched some numbers relating to NBA stars and concluded  that on average; the top 20 highest paid players in the NBA can expect to pay $1.2 million a year more in taxes” with players like Kevin Garnett and Kobe Bryant taking hits of 1.6M and 1.4M in additional tax burden, respectively.  That is some serious impact, although it will be hard to believe any of these players’ lifestyles will be affected.

However, let us not be fooled into thinking there is going to be this flurry of contracts in the major sports in reaction to the incoming tax policies of Barack Obama.  Teams and agents will take their normal course of business, as they seem to be doing.  Baseball free agency begins next week and yes, we will see a few monster contracts – Manny Ramirez, Mark Teixeira, CC Sabathia  – prior to the end of 2008.  That would happen regardless of the administration.

In the NFL, this past Monday’s contract deadline to allocate money into 2008 – with NFL teams averaging close to 7M in Cap room at the time — came and went with one consummated contract of note, that of Aaron Rodgers.  The next deadline for NFL contracts, this to have 2008 used as a prorated year, is at the end of the season.  There may be some activity, but probably no more than any other year.  The rumors of a player contract deluge prior to the end of the year have been greatly exaggerated…….

Obama’s right-hand, all-everything guy at his side at all times is Reggie Love, a former Duke basketball player who has parlayed himself into one of the closest aides of the President-Elect.  When I heard the name, it certainly sounded familiar, and not for the mellifluous tone to the sound of “Love”.  I was thinking, “I think I signed a guy named Reggie Love at one of our training camps.”

I was right.  I vaguely remember the signing, remembering that I was impressed/surprised that we were signing a player who played on such a marquee program as Duke basketball.   In truth, however, as it was the middle of training camp, he was there to take some reps for a couple of weeks and move on unless, of course, he was able to turn some heads and receive some Practice Squad consideration.   Here was our press release on August 9, 2004:

The Green Bay Packers Monday signed wide receiver Reggie Love, a non-drafted free agent who played two sports at Duke University, GM/Head Coach Mike Sherman announced.

Love, 22, lettered four years (2000-03) in football at Duke, starting at least four games every season. He led the Blue Devils in receiving as a senior, catching 27 passes for 290 yards and four touchdowns. In 40 career games at Duke, he totaled 895 yards on 75 receptions with six touchdowns.

A walk-on performer for Mike Krzyzewski for two seasons (2000-01, 2001-02), Love helped Duke to the 2001 NCAA Championship. A 6-4, 228-pound athlete, he played forward and center, backing up Carlos Boozer. In 37 career games, he averaged 1.1 points and 1.1 rebounds per game.

Love, who wears No. 10 on the Packers’ roster, was All-America in football and the state Player of the Year in basketball at Charlotte’s Providence Day School, in talent-rich North Carolina

Twenty days later, on August 29, in the first mandatory cutdown of the 2004 season, Love was released.  It was a brief, twenty-day career with the Packers (he later went on to sign with the Cowboys for camp in 2005), a three-week cup of coffee, as they say.  Sounds like he has moved on to bigger and better things…

Fantasy Draft Guide

Remarks

13 comments for “Obama Thought$”

  1. Mr.Murder
    November 7, 2008
    1:52 pm

    Actually, a balanced budget would double the value of their money. It’s worth almost half of what it was when Bush took office, thanks to the deficit spurned on by tax cuts for the most wealthy.

    Do you want seven million to be worth seven million, or over 45 per cent less than that amount as it is now?

    See big, think macro. Strong tax cuts = weak dollars. This is just pushing back money obligations to be atop the economy, with interest.

  2. David
    November 7, 2008
    2:23 pm

    You are close to being right. The deficit has hurt the value of the dollar. But according to numbers from the CBO Bush’s tax cuts are part of, not the main reason for the deficit– 2006 income was 58 billion below projected levels. The main reason is our spending like drunken sailors on entitlements and two expensive wars — 2006 spending was 514 billion above projected levels. We need to get our spending under control or we will be screwed. There is little to be done about income since federal income is based mainly on the GDP, not tax rates as one would assume.

  3. BigJohn
    November 7, 2008
    3:36 pm

    Andrew–

    A good, objective article.

    Mr. M–

    I think I speak for the majority when I say that political spin has no place in a football blog.

  4. m.thompson
    November 7, 2008
    6:22 pm

    Amen Big John, Mr. M., please take that elsewhere..

  5. Andrew Brandt
    November 7, 2008
    7:29 pm

    Understood from this end. This was my obligatory foray into politics for our site.
    Andrew

  6. Jerry in Texas
    November 8, 2008
    11:58 am

    Obamas’s tax redistribution is a “burden”? Yes. A burden to those who are making more than $250,000 a year. Since my wife and I are both teachers, we don’t fall into that category. Maybe you believe in “trickle down”, but I don’t. I respect your moves as a Packers money manager, but I reject your general economic theories.

  7. Andrew Brandt
    November 8, 2008
    12:22 pm

    Jerry-
    Was not trying to express any political views, only noting the tax implications for certain well-heeled athletes.
    I am now a teacher myself; I understand.
    Andrew

  8. Richard
    November 9, 2008
    8:37 am

    As a disabled retiree, living on a little more that $1,000. a month, I feel so badly that these multi-millionaires will incurr higher taxes. Maybe one less $100,000. car in the garage - all for playing a game which, in the long run, benefits society how? A diversion from reality so the sheep don’t notice they’re being sheared? Obama is the first President in nearly 50 years that gets it.

  9. Mack
    November 9, 2008
    9:16 pm

    For cryin out loud. You can’t make any comments on the economy lest they be deemed political. Sorry folks but for the time being, the economical structure in various industries (including sports) is going to bleed into the political discussion.

    As this is a blog about the finance of sports, I see nothing wrong with it. Huizinga’s proposed sale was both economical and political. He brought it up in the political context as well as the financial (capital gains)reality.

  10. 10-s partner
    November 9, 2008
    9:24 pm

    I read Brandt’s articles for info outside the norm. To the extent politics enter the picture, please write about it. We are pretty narrow minded if we think national politics won’t affect pro football.

  11. BigJohn
    November 9, 2008
    10:21 pm

    Andrew’s article did not take positions on tax policy or political matters. It is a neutral, mostly factual piece.

    He alluded to the fact that tax policy could affect decision-making and that the election apparently did not cause an unusual flurry of contract signings.

    He then recounted an interesting story about Reggie Love, who now apparently works for Obama.

    Those are not advocacy positions. If people want to take such positons, these should be confined to football-related topics. No one wants to hear any pro or anti Obama babble in here.

  12. Koition
    November 10, 2008
    11:59 am

    Since Obama’s a Bears fan, I’m suprised he hired a former Packer! :)

  13. Andrew Brandt
    November 10, 2008
    9:05 pm

    Koiton-
    Great comment. I suppose had he lasted longer as a Packer, he may not be where he is today.:)
    Andrew

Add a Remark

(required)

(won’t be published)