RSS

Burleson finds match in Lions

Plus, Clifton to the Redskins, the Bengals’ $10M mistake and more. Andrew Brandt

Print This March 05, 2010, 10:38 AM EST
6 Comments

Some early notes on the comings and goings:

It’s good to be Nate Burleson. Three years ago, he was the lucky beneficiary of the war between the Seahawks and the Vikings over the poison pill contract given to then-Seahawks guard Steve Hutchinson. The Seahawks reacted by using the same “poison pill” to extract Burleson from the Vikings with the same $49 million that Hutchinson got. Of course, Burleson only had $5.25M of that guaranteed, but that was a nice deal for Burleson. Now he becomes the first signing of the 2010 league year, a surprising choice of the first one out of the box, receiving $11M guaranteed on a five-year, $25M contract from the Lions. Although it is not at the level of the five-year, $40M deal with $15M guaranteed to T.J. Houshmandzadeh given by the Seahawks at this time last year, it is receiving a reaction around the league. One thing about the Lions: they will pay wide receivers, considered by many teams to be a low-impact position.

Chad Clifton is reportedly on his way to Washington. This is good news for Clifton and his agent; bad news for the Packers. Six years ago in the same position, Clifton and the Packers reached a deal. Now he’s on his way to meet Dan Snyder, whose left tackle just retired, who is close with Clifton’s agent, Jimmy Sexton, and who does not like hearing the word “No.” It looks like Chad could be a Redskin soon.

Speaking of the Redskins, their moves yesterday speak to the dangerous waters of free agency and the hit-or-miss quality. They released players that were once in the position that the lucky ones are in today — first-day free agents signing for top of market prices. At one time that applied to Antwaan Randle El, Randy Thomas (another Sexton client), Cornelius Griffin, Fred Smoot and Todd Collins. Now they are pushed aside and more pricey new toys will be added. Out with the old, in with the new.

There are more examples of recent treasures turned to trash, including:

Jake Delhomme was rewarded with an extension in April with $19M guaranteed. The face of the franchise has now been pushed aside. As I detailed in December when he was benched in favor of Matt Moore, the Panthers are on the hook for almost $13M in remaining guarantees. Of all the moves yesterday, that was the most surprising. The Panthers now have parted with Julius Peppers and Delhomme as they try to bring payroll down for 2010. They also decided to take the cap hit on Delhomme in the 2009 league year, a year with a cap, rather than releasing him in 2010, a year without a cap. That suggests to me that they believe the rumblings that I hear that there may be some form of retroactive accounting for moves made in 2010.

Laveranues Coles was a marquee free-agent signing at this time last year for the Cincinnati Bengals with a shiny new contract that totaled almost $10M (9.7M) for 2009 alone, paid the following way:

Signing Bonus - $3M
Roster Bonus - $4.7M
Salary - $1.9M
Workout Bonus - $100,000

The Bengals have been known to be a team that watches their spending. The release of Coles after one expensive season is an admission of almost a $10M mistake and perhaps a deterrent on any free-agent spending this year.

More comments to come…

Follow me on Twitter: adbrandt

Comments

Add a Comment
mack
Mar 05, 2010
11:23 AM

Rerports are that the Clifton wants $7 million a year - three years guaranteed
Chad Clifton for all his service to the Packers, is no longer a top Tackle (if he ever was).
He is injured frequently and makes many costly penalties that kill drives. Chad Clifton filling the Tackle spot for the Packers just makes it one less thing to worry about.

If the Redskins will guarantee Chad Clifton $20 million then Christmas comes early for Chad. Not only will he be paid far in excess of his talent but he won't get schooled by Allen and Peppers four times per year.

Kathleen Wutkowski
Mar 05, 2010
11:50 AM

Totally agree with poster Mack here. ..

The Packers part ways with an aging penalty machine that keeps dealing with injuries at an exponential rate and who wants top tier money and a three year contract for his services during his waning years. Seriously, the man is one injury away from season and/or career end. Any film study at all from last season will show he is getting schooled more regularly than not.

Now I appreciate all that Clifton has done for the Packers over the years, and I sincerely wish him well. Love the guy and hope he can retire a Packer. BUT you do not build and maintain a winning team by keeping players based on sentimentality.

In the words of The Byrds and the (loosely) Bible...to everything, turn, turn, turn.

HRMLSS
Mar 05, 2010
12:57 PM

Man, compared to previous years it really seems that the free agent signing is SLOW. It looks like the owners have put the clamps on spending. All these guys are taking more than a couple of visits, which tells me they are not hearing the numbers they wanted to hear.
On Kampman and Clifton, I wish then well and thank them for their time with the Packers. But no way Clifton is worth $7 million at this point in his career. And Kampman is not a great fit in this defense. On the positive side the Pack should get a couple of 3-4 round compensation picks next year.

WinningIsOnTheLine
Mar 05, 2010
07:32 PM

Chad Clifton is a penalty machine that kills drives eh? He should fit right in with the Skins then in taking Chris Samuels place another Mr. Drive Killer.

Randall
Mar 05, 2010
07:35 PM

Is WR really still a "low-impact position" in today's NFL with such a strong shift to the passing game. I don't deny that the money for Burleson is high for his production, but I'd think having a capable receiver (read as: anyone other than Bryant Johnson or Dennis Northcutt) opposite Megatron is going to help the passing game at least a little bit. I wouldn't love him as a number one, but as a number two and keeping in mind that convincing players to come to Detroit isn't the easiest of all sell jobs, I'm going to go ahead, as a Lions fan, and be okay with this contract. Now, need to find a way to keep Stafford off his backside.

replica rolex
Jul 22, 2010
11:02 AM

Main mistake I see there was not doing more to re-sign him after cutting him.
And as I recall had a couple of good, not great, years and then faded away.

Next 1 - 6 of 6 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)