The Cooley Zone counts Bodog, Mandalay Bay as sponsors Brad Biggs
Chris Cooley doesn’t have any pictures of his playbook on his blog this time. He’s not going to get in trouble for a snapshot of his junk, either.
Last season, he exposed more than the Washington Redskins playbook when he snapped a photo of it sitting in his naked lap, and then posted it on his Web site. You know how well that went over.
Cooley underwent successful surgery this morning to have three pins inserted into his right ankle, according to his brother Tanner’s Twitter account, and he might hear from the NFL soon when it comes to the companies advertising on his blog through the banner at the top. The popular tight end has a popular Web site—The Cooley Zone—and at the top of the page Tuesday when a reporter went looking for news on Cooley’s injury was an ad for an online gambling site—Bodog.com—with a convenient button to click that read “Bet Now.” The ad was in a banner that rotated various businesses including another with a gaming interest—the Las Vegas hotel and casino Mandalay Bay.
Chris Cooley's Web site includes ads for businesses in the gambling industry, including the online sports book Bodog as shown in this screen capture made Tuesday.
The NFL goes out of its way to distance itself from gambling interests, with the exception of the state lottery deals that were approved this season. The league aggressively fought the plan in Delaware for parlay betting as a means to raise tax revenue. The league strictly forbids players from associating with those that care about things like point spreads and over/unders.
Cooley’s online involvement with businesses in the gaming industry is in direct violation of the NFL policy if you take the standard NFL contract by the word. Paragraph 15 addresses integrity and states that the player acknowledges that if he “knowingly associates with gambling or gambling activity” the commissioner will have the right to fine the player, suspend the player for a certain period or indefinitely or terminate his contract.
Surely, Cooley has control over ads on his own Web site and had to know what companies would be appearing in ads on his Web site. He’s heavily involved in charitable and philanthropic endeavors in Washington, he sells some T-shirts and memorabilia and he generates great fan interest. He’s to blogging what Chad Ochocinco is to Twitter. Perception, unfortunately, becomes reality in these instances. When it looks like Cooley is associated with a gambling entity, he is associated with a gambling entity. That’s not something the league has ever taken lightly.
“We don't believe that more gambling on our players and games is healthy for the sport,’’ NFL spokesman Joe Browne told the Wall Street Journal earlier this year in reference to the situation in Delaware.
We doubt the league believes it’s healthy for players to take advertising revenue, no matter how much, from companies in the gambling world.
Follow me at Twitter: BradBiggs
Why don't you do your homework like a responsible journalist would. In case you and everyone who reads this doesn't know, his brother runs his website. Get a life. Don't be mad because his site probably see's twice the hits per day that yours does.
Leonitas, it doesn't matter who runs the website. The point made pretty explicitly in the article is if gambling is associated with his site, no matter the details, the NFL could have a problem with it. It doesn't matter if, or that, his brother runs his webpage; it matters that Cooley ultimately controls what's there and it would be his choice whether or not to accept money from a gambling site.
That his brother runs it is irrelevant, it's still Chris Cooley's site.
Interesting. I didn't know that NFL players can't associate with gambling or gamlbing activity". I guess this rule stems back to the Paul Hornung stuff? Maybe Art Schlichter to be more accurate. Not to get all outraged and all that, but I find it amusingly hypocritical that the league is so strict on gambling yet it allows its players to partake in fantasy football, which is socially acceptable gambling. Not that any player would throw a game for fantasy's sake of course, but it's the principle of the matter.
When Chris Cooley steps on the field shirtless with goldenpalace.com scribbled on his back then I'll be alarmed . Until then I think this site has a fantasy football section & articles about which team will beat the spread . I believe you can find both on NFL.com as well . If you don't think fantasy football is mainly about gambling you are fooling yourself . I understand about protecting the integrity of the game but easy on the hypocrisy .
Doesn't matter - beating spreads, fantasy football, whatever. The NFL doesn't want to be tied in any way to anything remotely resembling gambling. If the links to Mandalay, etc aren't down by tomorrow I'd be surprised.
Lotto schadenfreude abounds. Cooley was hurt this week and will miss plenty of time. Kicking a good man when he's down isn't very nice. If the league can pick and choose its own antitrust ground, why not players?
Both will be ruled to distance from it in time. One will get damages from the other party, should some kind of double standard be applied by the League.
Don't the Packers have state lotto ads on their tickets?
dan, the fourth paragraph of the article:
"The NFL goes out of its way to distance itself from gambling interests, with the exception of the state lottery deals that were approved this season."
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Says he hasn't spoken to Lerner...
Running back has hip injury
Will miss Sunday's game vs. Atlanta
Two Titans combined for $17,500...
Heap has sore ribs, Ngata has...
Oct 28, 2009
01:48 PM
How stupid can players get?