RSS

Do broadcast deals help owners?

Plus Plax, Williams sisters and trash. Andrew Brandt

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This August 21, 2009, 12:42 PM EST
4 Comments

Broadcast Deals Extended

In the midst of this economic downturn, the NFL has extended important broadcast deals with its partners for two more years. Set to expire following the 2011 season -- if there is a 2011 season -- the league’s deals with the following partners will run through the 2013 season: Fox, CBS, DirectTV and now NBC, as the NFL announced it has extended its six-year agreement with the network for two more seasons of Sunday Night Football. Reports indicate the extension has an increase of two percent over current levels.

Although the exact payment terms of these deals have not been released, the most important point in these extensions is the answer to the following question: Do payments to the NFL continue in the event there’s no football in 2011 because of a lockout of the players by ownership?

Although the answer to that question is unclear regarding the network deals, a source with knowledge of them confirms that, at the least, the DirecTV deal does include payments as scheduled in 2011, with or without football.

Thus, if the lockout scenario were to take place and there were no football revenues to be shared with the players in 2011, ownership would still have a revenue source coming in even without the games. Of course, we’re a long way from that time, but the discussion will continue to ramp up over the coming months.

Just the Facts, Plax

Plaxico BurressAPBurress is headed to jail for two years

Plaxico Burress finally faced reality, perhaps for the first time in his life. An enormous talent that was rewarded at this time a year ago with a large contract extension with the Giants, Burress has been around yes-men and enablers his entire life. As it usually is with people who have no reality in their lives, his crew has always told him what he wanted to hear rather than what he needed to hear.

Somehow, some way, someone got to Burress. Notorious for his continued self-delusional behavior, he decided to not con himself any longer and accepted a two-year prison term. In the past six months, Burress had turned down deals from both the Giants and the prosecutors. He probably wishes he took both as he now faces the harsh truth.

Venus, Serena Swim In

Stephen Ross continues to leverage celebrity in his nascent ownership of the Dolphins. First, it was Jimmy Buffett and his Land Shark Lager branding opportunity. Then Ross brought in Emilio and Gloria Estefan as minority owners, followed by Marc Anthony (and his wife Jennifer Lopez). Now, two of the most marketable and well-known female athletes in the world, Venus and Serena Williams, have joined the gathering, reportedly the latest in the group of renowned minority investors of the team. I would expect that Venus and Serena would use this investment as a cross-promotion opportunity for their other brands in tennis, fashion and design.

Ross has made his intentions clear in trying to find that elusive concept of “buzz” in a marketplace crowded with options. Kudos for having the gumption to try and give the Dolphins the cachet of a Lakers game in the NBA, with equal parts watching the game and gazing at the stars.

Treasure to Trash

There have been a couple of recent examples of one of my favorite mantras about free agency in the NFL: A team’s treasure can become – sooner than you’d think – its trash.

Jason DavidJason David

Jason David was a the recipient of a generous offer sheet from the Saints two years ago, which he signed on April 30, 2007. David leveraged his Super Bowl-champion performance into a strong contract with the Saints at top-level cornerback proportions.

Two seasons later, David is gone, replaced by shinier new parts of the Saints such as free agent Jabari Greer and first-round pick Malcolm Jenkins. David went from a big free agent signing to termination in two years.

And, in a much shorter time frame, a couple of players intertwined with the Raiders were signed by their teams in the spring to only be released in the summer. I worked on a small deal with former Raiders safety Rashad Baker with the Eagles in March – complete with a Capitol Grille dinner with Baker and his two agents – and heard the story of how he put the Eagles in the playoffs last season by intercepting a pass for the Raiders to seal a win against the Buccaneers. Baker’s upfront amount was nominal -- $25,000 -- but he was released this week by the Eagles.

Baker was signed back by the Raiders (he probably shouldn’t have left), causing a ripple effect in which Oakland released venerable fullback Lorenzo Neal, who was signed on May 8 for a minimum-salary benefit contract (a contract paying Neal his 10-year minimum but only counting as a two-year minimum against the salary cap).

Between Baker and Neal, the total amount of at-risk dollars for the teams was $25,000, and the teams are no worse for having signed them. It just shows how things change in the perception of players, sometimes within a few months.

Comments

Add a Comment
I'm Just Sayin'
Aug 21, 2009
01:17 PM

Wow. Jimmy Buffett, Estefans, Marc Anthony, J-Lo and now the Williams Sisters? The Dolphins are officially the gayest team in the NFL (not that there is anything wrong with that). Seriously, I would rather have the legendary quarterback of my favorite team go to that teams 2nd biggest rival. Oh wait, that just happened.

PS - Sorry Vikings fans, The Bears are still the Packers biggest rival and always will be.

Packer Pete
Aug 21, 2009
04:02 PM

Just Sayin, a bit of clarification. I believe most Packer fans would say the Bears are our most appreciated rivals because of the long histories of the teams. I've rooted for the Bears in seasons when Green Bay failed to reach the playoffs. The Vikings, though, are the most bitter rivals and raise the bile in our collective throat. I don't know exactly why that is, but then I can't explain why the atmosphere is 23 percent oxygen. Just seems natural, I guess. Maybe it's because the Vikings play indoor football. Maybe it's because of the fair-weather Viking fans and the partially empty dump, er, stadium during losing seasons. (Can't get into Lambeau even in a 4-12 year.) Maybe it's because during the past two decades, the Packers and Bears have ridden the teeter totter -- one up, one down each season -- while the Packers and Vikings have ridden the swingset -- both up or both down each season, making the annual games more critical. This year won't be different. Both the Bears and Vikings got shiny new quarterbacks this year. Think the Culter-lead Bears will get our blood flowing this year more than that old guy in purple?

I'm Just Sayin'
Aug 21, 2009
05:35 PM

Packer Pete, I know some Packer fans that agree with you but personally I feel that considering the Vikes the biggest rival is somewhat shortsighted. Before Lovie Smith when the Packers owned the Bears was when this shift took place. Sure, Favre may elevate the Viking/Packer rivalry, but for how long? I'd say about 16 games.

You bring up some good points though - the dome, the fickleness of the fans, but those confirm why I can respect the Bears organization and I cannot respect the Vikings. You rooted for the Bears? Yeesh, can't do it. I even rooted for Manning and the Colts in that Super Bowl and I really don't like that organization. And I'll never forget the look on John Randall's face when Morten Anderson made that field goal to push the Falcons into the Super Bowl instead of the Vikings. I laughed my butt off.

Anyway, I am way off topic and its almost Beer O'Clock.

PS - can't wait for the first few series of the Vikings game tonight.

mack
Aug 22, 2009
04:01 PM

I live in Chicago, have all my life. I have also been a Packer fan for the last 43 years (I'm 50 now).
The Bears are our longest and biggest rivalry but lets face it, it now lacks the same heat of the Viking rivalry.

Rivalry's are strong if both teams have periods of equality where they are hard fought. In the mid 80's until 1992 (Holmgren and Wolf) The Bears owned the Packers. Only in 1989 was that challenged. then from 1992 until Holmgren left, the Packers owned the Bears. Now there years where they split.

The Packers have been in a pitched battle with the Vikings since Dennis Green arrived in Minnesota. How many games did the Packers win in the dome with Favre? Not many. The Vikings also have had talent on the team that threatened but could never be a consistent winner.

It also has to do with the temper of the fans. I know Bears fans and media here who hate the Packers and that is OK. Generally we as fans are honest about our teams failings when we play each other. We talk trash but we are pretty closely connected. Halas even helped save the Packers in the 50's by helping the stock offering.

Viking fans to me (in general - not all) are a lot of noise. They thump their chests about their team and will bad mouth ours while theirs fails - again. I respect the Vikings as a team but they are a puzzle. So much talent for what purpose? As for the fans, win something first and then you can woof about it.

As a matter of disclosure, I am a Packer stock holder. My brother is a Bears season ticket holder and life time fan. One of my sisters lives in the twin cities where they are Vikings fans. She and her family also lived in Denver for five years where they became Bronco fans before moving back to Minnesota. So, Vikings-Broncos-Vikings (get the picture?). My brother lived in Dallas for four years and never rooted for the Cowboys. He never slags me because he saw me keep my mouth shut when the Packers were awful in the 70's and 80's.

The Bears - our biggest rival (I'd root for them in a Super Bowl)
The Vikings - our hated rival (I'd never root for them)

Next 1 - 4 of 4 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)