Browns coach must figure out a new way to do his job. Robert Boland
Someone has to rise to defend Cleveland Browns coach Eric Mangini after he was attacked -- not here or by another football publication but by Rolling Stone magazine. Perhaps the lyrics to his last album were pedestrian? Maybe so, but even a magazine better known for music reviews has to have limits of decency, and comparing Mangini to Augustus Gloop, the fat kid in the Willie Wonka films, is over the top.
APEven national music publications are criticizing Browns head coach Eric Mangini.
So let it be me to take up for Mangini, about whom I was once the subject of a “separated at birth” email after he took over the Jets. We do look a bit alike. We both played on the line for schools better known for their academics than their football. We both wrestled. We are Capricorns, we probably both like sunsets and we share a certain fondness for carbohydrates. Even our wives look a bit similar, both striking blondes. We both clearly “married up.” But having some Rolling Stone guy compare Mangini to a gluttonous German kid with “fat bulging from every fold, with two greedy eyes peering out of his doughball of a head” who falls into a chocolate river and is sung about by Oompa Loompas is way out of bounds.
Besides, Mangini is only a light-heavyweight by NFL standards. Like a lot of us, Mangini might want to consider some extra cardio and a salad at lunch, but he is no Andy Reid or Rex Ryan in the weight department. Heck, Mike Holmgren used to be a quarterback and he’s bigger. Green Bay’s Mike McCarthy used to be a tight end and he could easily be tipping the scales heavier than Mangini. It’s not as if Eric Mangini is Mark Mangino, the University of Kansas coach who is more than a bit weight challenged. But Mangino’s record is 5-1 (despite having played no one more formidable than Duke) and Mangini’s is 1-5, and that may be all that matters.
Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi was also incorrect in saying that Mangini is failing in either having a plan or communicating it to his players. Mangini has a plan, it’s just not a good one. Sadly, as one NFL insider said, he is a decent enough coach who has “institutionalized all the things that got him fired from the Jets.” He is pushing the same mysteriousness, lack of communication and incongruous toughness in Cleveland that he did in New York. Except he clearly thinks because it didn’t succeed on the Hudson, if he turns up the volume even more, it will succeed on Lake Erie.
The one clear thing Mangini never learned from his lone coaching mentor, Bill Belichick, is the need for another way. Most people may have noticed that Belichick isn’t the most fun loving and easy going guy, but he does handle his team effectively. And he carries with him that little bit of extra gravitas that a bank vault full of championship rings provides. Mangini has none of that -- at least not as a head coach -- and the more he strains and presses, the harder it becomes for him to truly find another way or a variety of other ways. Albert Einstein said the definition of insanity “is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.” Rather than taking what he learned from Belichick and what worked in New York and putting it together in a style that works for him, Mangini seems to be trying too hard to be someone he’s not. If Browns owner Randy Lerner didn’t owe both ex-coach Romeo Crennel and former GM Phil Savage several more years of pay, Mangini might be in real trouble.
APMangini didn't learn everything from mentor Bill Belichick.
The legendary basketball coach John Wooden once said that when he started coaching he had “many rules and a few suggestions” and when he finished coaching he had “few rules and many suggestions,” and that seems to be the lesson Mangini hasn’t even considered. Mangini did a decent enough job with the Jets. If you’ve watched the Jets over the years, his record (two games under .500 with one playoff appearance in three seasons) is considered pretty good, even if he may have been overmatched as a 35-year-old facing the New York media, which actually drinks the blood of coaches who show fear. But he lost the locker room and the owner and his job.
Ideally, he should have taken some time to reflect on what went wrong and learned some new approaches, while vowing never to let history repeat itself. Belichick did that. So did Pete Carroll. They emerged changed and for the better. In fact, Mangini, who has a good relationship with Carroll, should have gone to USC and learned how to get the best out of players without making every day a knock-down drag-out fight about everything. But another NFL head job beckoned and no one could blame Mangini for jumping at it.
Wooden’s advice says that a veteran coach knows which battles to fight and which to avoid, and Mangini doesn’t seem to get that. Reinventing one’s self on the job is really hard. Arguably, only Tom Coughlin really has pulled off that trick, and it took the intervention of a sage owner in John Mara and a clear threat. Even Tony Dungy had to get fired to win.
Mangini needs to reinvent himself, and he can’t look to Lerner or newly hired consultant Bernie Kosar for help. He can, however, find himself some help in the form of a former NFL head coach or GM who has been there and done that and who has no desire to do it again. Spend time with him, alone at night in the office. Pick his brain and learn that suggestions often go a lot farther than rules. Smile a bit more. You’re a nice guy with a great family, and you’re good looking, since you look like me. There’s time to save this thing, but Rolling Stone was right in saying that it’s running out.
It took me forty years to learn which battles to fight and which to avoid.
Lerner should have done some more research before hiring Mangini. It was probably obvious to the casual observer that he needed some more seasoning.
He could easily talk to Sam Rutigliano - Sam lives nearby and couild be a tremendous help to Mangini.
The criticism of Mangini is warranted and comes with the territory for the coach of a losing team but I think much of it is over the top. The Browns have been a lousy team for the better part of 10 years now and frankly they are likely the worst team in the NFL, or at least in the bottom 5. This team is bad talent-wise and even worse attitude-wise. Any coach that came in last year was going to have to completely revamp the roster, not only to improve the talent, but the get new people in here who haven't been contaminated by the losing attitude that seems to be part and parcel of this franchise since 1999. It's simply going to take time. Everyone talks about the quick turnarounds in Denver and Atlanta and I can't argue against that but I think the Browns are more like the Lions, Rams and Bills and in all of those cases the rebuilding process is simply going to take longer.
Sure, comparing Mangini to Augustus Gloop is a little over the top. But there is a certain resemblance, you must admit.
But I think your article has a more damning criticism - Mangini is trying to be someone he is not. He's a poseur. Apparently, the lessons he learned in NE were that victory lies in secrecy, lack of communication, and "incongruous tougness" (Beautiful turn of a phrase by the way). That's not a plan, that's a style. Apparently he didn't learn any actual substantive football lessons in NE, but absorbed the wrong lesson that style trumps substance. That is the fundamental problem with all poseurs. Indeed, it is an apt approximation of the definition of Poseur.
So I disagree with you that Mangini has demonstrate any type of "plan." He doesn't know what kind of football he wants to play, so he can't choose the right type of player. Same problem he had in NY. The guy's problems go beyond the need to pick the brain of an established coach in the NFL. He needs to go back to the beginning, and learn the right lessons - A substantive plan is more important than coaching style.
...correction to the photo caption: Mangini didn't learn anything....
The Rock N Roll Hall of Fame is a bigger show than the Browns, the rocker magazine decided to try its hand at something aside from music.
Memo to Rolling Stone:
The Derek Trucks Band is making amazing music right now, and bridging eras of rock history by welding some of the greatest genres into a signature style, one that actually escapes definition or category much of the time.
Maybe listeners or readers would like to hear what is on Mangini's play list for his MP3 instead of the play call sheet, or whose camera is taping an opponents' signals. They probably want to hear about music in a music magazine.
Taibbi's job is to go over the top, and he has written about sports for other magazines using this style as well. Men's Health, etc. Complaining about him equating Mangini with Gloop is like walking out of a George Carlin show because the late comic used the word "fart:" The only thing that should've been surprising is that that's all he did. Go look up some of what Taibbi writes about politics and you'll see that by his standards this was exceedingly tame.
As for Murder and the rest, give me a break. We're really going to pretend it isn't normal for every magazine that's even marginally male-centric - from Playboy to Guns-n-Ammo and everything in between - to branch out into sports as well? Seriously? By that argument the NFP needs to fire Gustini and Billy Bigwheel(?) because I come here for football news, not humor. (See how little sense that makes?)
Oh and Taibbi isn't a music critic. He's a journalist, and as I pointed out already has background in sports journalism in addition to a stint as a pro basketball player (in Mongolia of all places.) But I guess looking into who someone is before you try to discredit them out of hand is just too much to ask.
I concur with Mr. Murder - the Derek Trucks band is one of the best things running, and Derek Trucks is the best guitarist on the planet stylistically right now (yes, Satriani and Vai can play very fast and technically sound, and no, please don't even mention John Mayer like he belongs in the same category as Derek Trucks).
Rolling Stone should stick to music.
Although if you REALLY want to subject yourself to terrible, biased writing, read their political 'commentaries,' which couldn't possibly be more biased and less objective than they already are. According to Rolling Stone, Obama should be canonized by the Catholic Church... for what, who knows? But it's not the Democrats' fault that they can't get anything done despite majorities in both houses... I used to be a Democrat and I STILL think they're painfully biased.
Comparing Mangini to a character from Willy Wonka is far from the worst thing they've done.
Very good article.
Thanks
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Says he hasn't spoken to Lerner...
Running back has hip injury
Will miss Sunday's game vs. Atlanta
Two Titans combined for $17,500...
Heap has sore ribs, Ngata has...
Oct 23, 2009
12:47 PM
He could easily talk to Sam Rutigliano - Sam lives nearby and couild be a tremendous help to Mangini.