Agents don’t get a lot of calls from their clients during the first half of camp, but when they do it’s usually bad news. In most cases, it’s about an injury.
APEd Reed is on the PUP list
When a good vet gets injured, the team goes the extra mile to do everything possible to get him back and ready. It will save him a roster spot and wait until he recovers. If it’s very bad, it will place him on the PUP (physically unable to perform) Reserve list in hopes of getting him back by Week 7 of the regular season, the first week that PUP reserved players either have to be moved to the 53-man roster, released or put on injured reserve (IR).
If you’re an undrafted free agent, a late-round draft pick or a street free agent, you may get treated a lot differently. It’s the difference between flying first class and coach (and getting the middle seat).
For players who go on IR, it’s pretty cut and dried. They’re lost to that team for the season. However, if they’re released at some point after being placed on IR, it’s because, in the team’s opinion, they’re healthy enough to play and are then free to sign with another team.
THE INJURY SETTLEMENT
One of the most important roles of an agent is to shine when his client gets hurt during camp, especially if he’s a down-the-line player who’s already a long shot to make the team. When a player in this category suffers a serious injury (out for six weeks or more), the team wants to part ways quickly and wash its hands of the liability.
When a team calls an agent and says it wants to do an “injury settlement,” that means the agent and either the GM or salary-cap manager have to come up with a time frame they think would be equivalent to the duration of the player’s injury. This process is greatly flawed because you have two non-medical professionals trying to forecast the healing time of an injury based on the team doctor’s prognosis. It’s the agent’s job to tell the team that the player would like a second opinion. Teams must agree to a second opinion but don’t always like it because 80 percent of the time the second doctor forecasts a much longer recovery.
Once both doctors’ opinions are in, a negotiation for the injury settlement begins. If the team doctor thinks the player will be fully recovered in six weeks and the second-opinion doctor says 10 weeks, both parties may agree on an eight-week settlement. So if a player was hurt on Aug. 15, he would be paid as if he was on the roster until Week 4 of the regular season. He’s then paid for four preseason games and four-sixteenths of what his salary would have been for that season.
These are not always simple negotiations. Sometimes, the spread in medical opinions can be as much as 10 weeks to three months. I have an internal policy not to attempt an injury settlement if there’s a prognosis of 10 weeks or more. I would prefer to put the responsibility on the team to carry the player on IR until it can either prove the player is healthy or the player tells me he’s healthy enough to play. I basically don’t want to play doctor and try to predict recovery times. When I tried it as a younger agent, I was wrong 60 percent of the time.
These negotiations can also become testy at times. When a team has an injured player it brought in strictly as a camp guy, it hates being stuck with the liability of rehabbing the player and paying him a contract. It will aggressively pursue a short injury settlement. Additionally, some teams will even pressure the agent into taking an inferior deal with threats of “We’ll never sign another one of your players again if you don’t take this deal.”
APStewart Bradley is on IR for '09.
In 2000, I represented a seventh-round pick who suffered a concussion during the second week of camp. Three days later, the NFC West division team threw him back into practice, and he suffered another concussion. Seven days after that, he went back into live action and suffered a third concussion. Although the player knew he never should have returned to practice, he felt he was under pressure to show the coaches he was worthy of making the team.
After a second opinion, I asked the GM (who’s now out of the league) to place my client on IR for the year for his own good. He would also earn his full salary, which, although important, wasn’t the reason I wanted him moved to IR. The GM had another opinion. He told me that my client was faking the injuries, was conning the team and the doctors, and he was going to cut him without any consideration of pay.
I then told the GM that if he did that, I would file a grievance with the NFL Players Association and hold the team accountable for my client’s injury and salary. He began screaming at me that I was in on the “scam” and that if I did file a grievance he would never sign or draft one of my players again. All I could really do was laugh and tell him that I had to follow protocol, not play doctor, and do what was in the best interests of my client.
We eventually had several other medical specialists confirm the concussions and won the grievance for my client’s full salary. The player retired, and the team drafted another of my clients two years later. Business as usual.
Many agents who take inferior injury settlements wind up getting fired when the recovery time is much longer than the settlement time. A seasoned agent will always proceed based on a worst-case scenario for his client. I just hope I don’t have to negotiate any this year.
Follow me on Twitter: jackbechta
Thank you for a very interesting read. It troubles me how indifferent profession football is to the health and well-being of the players. It makes me feel like I shouldn't be a fan.
Great Question Snake! No! he would not be eligible to sign back with the pack for the remainder of the season. However, if Tory and the Pack reach an injury settlement prior to the start of the season, he can return 6 weeks AFTER the length of the amount of time of the settlement. For example, if Tory and the Pack agree to a 7 week injury settlement today, which would go to week 3 of the regular season, he would not be able to return to the Pack until week 9 of the regular season. If the Packers really love him they would place him IR for the season so they keep the rights to him.
This may sound dumb, but why would a player accept a settlement if the alternative is going on the IR? The team doesn't have any other option, do they? Either cut a deal or IR. What's the upside to the player to taking a settlement when he doesn't know how long an injury may last? Also, the team has to rehab him when he's on IR.
Great Question Snake! No! he would not be eligible to sign back with the pack for the remainder of the season. However, if Tory and the Pack reach an injury settlement prior to the start of the season, he can return 6 weeks AFTER the length of the amount of time of the settlement. For example, if Tory and the Pack agree to a 7 week injury settlement today, which would go to week 3 of the regular season, he would not be able to return to the Pack until week 9 of the regular season. If the Packers really love him they would place him IR for the season so they keep the rights to him.
Thanks for the information on the grievance process, Jack.
meateater: its not that cut and dry. the team can still 'waive a player injured" thus acknowledging the injury responsibilty. but leaving the healing time up for debate which in time can work in their favor. The player may want to do a settlement becuase he feels strongly that he can be healed and back 100% before seasons end. Players get forgotten about when they are buried on IR It also give them a chance to sign back with their orignally team.
I was was in a show down with the Rams and Matt bowen when they tried to cut him injured. I started the grievence process against them claiming he should be on IR. However, the packers (and 4 otherr teams) were interested in him so I asked the Pack to sign him, rehab him on the inactive list, and move him up when he was ready. It worked great for Matt as he started a few games for the Pack and showed the league what he could do. the following year he landed a nice multi-million dollar contract with the Redskins( becuase I couldnt get andrew brandt to match it). Now we are all on the same team here at the POST.
Best article of the week and best replies too!
Really interesting article (didn't think it would be when I read the title, was very wrong :) )
So, to take Bowen as the example. After he'd signed with the Packers and was rehabbing did he count against the salary cap? You say rehabbing on the inactive list by which I assume you mean the 53 man roster so I'd assume he would count?
What are the rules in general surrounding injury settlements and the salary cap?
Thanks Jack, I always wondered how that process worked. Great column, and I think we all appreciate that you take the time to respond to questions.
Here's a suggestion for a future column. It was widely reported that Mike Vick would not sign with the Redskins because his agent Joel Segal also rep'd Jason Campbell, the team's incumbent starter. How do agents deal with that kind of situation? It must come up repeatedly. Could Vick have brought in another agent to deal with the Skins? Do agents generally consider this type of conflict to be an absolute bar, would they go to their client and get a waiver or what?
Great article Jack. Can an injury settlement be negotiated by an agent for a non serious injury that has a few week prognosis versus the 6 weeks as you mention above? I guess what I'm asking is if it has to be diagnosed as a 6 weeks or greater recovery time by the team's medical staff or second opinion doctor to begin talks of an injury settlement? Also, can an agent try to negotiatie an injury settlement for something less serious if the player is a down the line guy as you say and looks like he may get released?
jack; why not bring an action against the gm who threatened never to take another client? sounds like bad faith to me if he uses threats to negotiate a better deal for his team and a lesser one for your client. what procedures would you or could you take to prevent a gm from exercising on one of these threats and have you?
Great article. Thanks
Great column! I am in law school right now, and this whole situation seems to be like a Workers' Comp claim without the exclusivity of Workers' Comp statutes governing procedures. It seems like the NFLPA should try to rally the troops on this one, especially considering the new CBA talks that are looming in the not so distant future.
In TN, as I am sure it is true with every other state, we have very precise and methodical procedures mediated by the TN Dept. of Labor on having medical specialists (Neurosurgeons, Ortho's, etc.) give impairment ratings (e.g. "60% partial permanent") to claimants. Of course both sides have these work ups done, and there is certainly disparities between plaintiff and defendant medical specialist's impairment ratings, but the system works rather seamlessly, all things considered.
As with any human invention, there is always error (and sandbagging), but certainly a more precise system of dealing with marginal players injuries would be in the interests of all those involved instead of this amorphous set of procedures that seemingly prevail today.
Your thoughts?
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Super Bowl means catering to clients,...
With no salary floor and fewer...
Eliminate the game and give players...
Taking care of business and keeping...
An ‘umbrella’ can provide coverage...
Aug 14, 2009
12:10 PM
Jack:
I have a question using a current player as an example.
Tory Humphrey, a 3rd string TE with the Packers was just placed on IR with a broken arm.
If the Packers cut him before the season, and he's healthy week 6 of the season, I know that he's able to sign with another club.
But would he be eligible to sign with the Packers, the original club who cut him?