Very Fake Al Davis weighs in on the Tom Cable fracas Ray Gustini
HELLO.
I am writing on the computer today to address some misconceptions regarding an alleged incident last week where Raiders coach Tom Cable supposedly attacked secondary coach Randy Hanson. While I usually prefer the details of such incidents to stay in-house, strapped to a trundle bed watching old Ritz Brothers movies, the ugly nature of these rumors has prompted me to speak out in a public forum.
Misconception No. 1: Tom Cable attacked Randy Hanson.
FALSE!
APTom/Ted Cable.
First of all, our coach’s name is Ted, not Tom, so that makes me wonder right there. Is it possible Ted has an evil twin? Of course. You always run that risk. But what are the odds that evil twin is named Tom? Maybe 15 percent, tops? Plus, HR says he checked “no” in the evil twin box when he was first hired. Ted’s a good man, and Ted wouldn’t lie about something like an evil twin. Breaking an assistant’s jaw, maybe, but definitely not about having an evil twin. The only logical conclusion is that Randy Hanson is a liar. For all we know, he doesn’t even have a jaw.
Misconception No. 2: Furniture in the Raiders training complex has become self-aware.
MAYBE FALSE!
After everybody realized that Ted would no more attack Randy Hanson than attempt a razzle-dazzle fake field-goal with Sebastian Janikowski, the natural inclination was to assume that the furniture in our training complex — specifically the conference tables — had turned against their human overlords. Admittedly, this was a tempting line of reasoning. I’m not going to sit here and pretend we haven’t had our problems with office supplies becoming self-aware — from 1995-1997, I personally waged war against a device known as a “shredder” that would maliciously pulverize important documents into narrow strips of paper whenever the mood would strike. I solved that problem with a silver bullet to the machine’s brain, a course of action that will prove difficult in this case as mahogany conference tables, unlike shredders, do not have brains (they also reproduce asexually.) My question remains: Why Randy Hanson? His stellar work with DeAngelo Hall and Michael Huff aside, Randy isn’t the kind of guy you become sentient just to eliminate. What about me, or Ted or even John Herrera, the man who programmed our computers to feel pain. This bring us to our third misconception…
Misconception No. 3: Lane Kiffin was not directly involved in the attack on Randy Hanson.
FALSE!
Lane Kiffin.
Because of ongoing litigation, I can’t say as much as I would like, but don’t you find it interesting that Lane left the Raiders to coach in the state known for its rich jawbreaking heritage? I mean, he could have gone to a traditional football power like SMU, Army or Cornell. Instead he chose the University of Tennessee, which just so happens to be located in a town called KNOXVILLE. I think you can see what I’m getting at.
Misconception No. 4: The Napa Police Department will roll over for the Raiders.
FALSE!
The brutal, take-no-prisoners approach of the Napa P.D. was famously on display in Paul Schrader’s 1978 film “Vino Vengeance,” where mild-mannered Midwesterner Lester Vino (George C. Scott) teams up with a Napa detective (William Devane) to rescue his daughter (ably played by Tuesday Weld’s daughter, Wednesday) from a depraved band of sommeliers. Even as the town’s preeminent nonagenarian, I am at risk for a taxing investigation that ends with Ted and/or Tom Cable being arrested as he/they attempt to board a moving train.
Misconception No. 5: The Raiders are a team in disarray.
VERY FALSE!
Ha! We’ve got at least six quarterbacks we could give the starting job to. Can any other team in the league say that? Guys like Napoleon Harris are begging to come back to us. Even our punter is making $12 million. Commitment to excellence, baby.
Follow Fake Al on Twitter: VeryFakeAlDavis
I haven't laughed this hard in a really long time... Good work ray
Awesome work again, Ray. I understand the consternation exhibited by the first person to comment; however, I hope he understands that this is sarcasm. Everyone knows that Al Davis is/was integral to the success of the modern game, but as he has progressed from his position of power to his current position as ostracized NFL owner he has made some very questionable personnel moves that have brought humor and disgrace to a once storied franchise (trading of Jon Gruden for draft picks, JaMarcus Russell, DHB, and whatever future decisions that will be made in the next five years)...I am a Browns fan, and we have no history to call our own and would love to be in a position to enjoy the humor that comes with a deposed leader, keep on doing what you do, its great.
I guess the price of being a "somebody" is being lampooned by a "nobody". You don't know football well enough to contribute anything meaningful to this website and you're not nearly funny enough to write for the Onion.
Even funnier than the article was Bub's response.
Steve, ever heard of the pot calling the kettle black?
Your post is classic unintentional comedy.
So I'm a "nobody" and the author is a "somebody"? If I go on the street and utter the name "Ray Gustini" will people will be falling all over themselves gushing about his many Pulitzers? Honestly are you one of his buddies? Have you ever heard of him?
I'll rephrase it so you can understand: I guess the price of being a "legend" is being lampooned by an "unfunny, unfamous writer".
Better?
Good article! Bub's response also got me to laugh several times.
Steve-
I need a list of your accomplishments, so which we can properly measure Ray's work...you know, almost like trying to standardize this whole thing.
Steve, I'm sorry that the irony escapes you. I got a good laugh out of it, though.
Jack- The irony doesn't escape me, but I'm not supposed to be a football writer/comedian. I'm just a guy who reads the site. And they do ask for our comments, don't they? Hopefully that answer satisfies Ben too.
To clarify, I don't agree with making a Hall of Famer and legend into Ray's comedy routine. But my bigger problem is that Ray's not funny.
Amen! When a Charger fan gets it right, you better stand up and take notice! I guess there's no improvement news about the Raiders to talk about? Go figure!
Hey Bub, drinks on me!
MJ,
Raider fan forever
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Says he hasn't spoken to Lerner...
Running back has hip injury
Will miss Sunday's game vs. Atlanta
Two Titans combined for $17,500...
Heap has sore ribs, Ngata has...
Aug 25, 2009
10:10 PM
Can you and the rest of the so-called sports media give the Raiders bashing a rest finally? Good God, I pity you if this is your idea of justifying your job! For years the NFL has done everything in it's power to make the Raider irrelevant. Immaculate Reception, Tuck Rule, Holy Roller Rule, No Stickum Rule and don't forget so-called sports writers like you who continue to overlook Raider Hall of Fame players not in the HOF! Can you say Ray Guy? Ken Stabler; all he did was quarterback the RAIDERS to a lopesided SB IX win and several Division Titles. You clowns can write this kind of non-sense, but be certain of this fact: the RAIDERS being good is great for the NFL. Any fan of any team who knows the NFL would agree. With regards to Al Davis, you should only hope you have his competance. The NFL would not be the NFL without Al Davis and his contributions as commissioner and an owner. Al's infuence thwarted a players strike just two years ago! Oh you forgot all his contributions??? Surprise! Surprise! Move on now to players giving the NFL a black eye; not the team who's logo possesses a black patch over an eye! By the way...... I'm a Charger fan who happens to realize the truth about the Raiders and their owner, Al Davis! File that one!!!