Escalators can provide incentives for players and protect teams. Andrew Brandt
In the second part of my series about negotiating rookie contracts, I take a look at the mechanism that allows players to upgrade their fourth year.
In the past, most teams used three-year contracts in all lower rounds. After three years in the league, the player is entitled to rights as a restricted free agent, allowing him to seek offers from other teams, for which the incumbent team has a right to match or lose the player for compensation, depending on the level of the tender offer.
APSteelers owner Dan Rooney
In the past five years, more and more teams have switched from three- to four-year contracts for all draft picks below the second round. Any term longer than four years was outlawed by the 2006 extension of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, restricting all contracts below the first round to four years. As a result, almost all teams except a couple of holdouts now negotiate four-year contracts (interestingly, the two Super Bowl participants, Arizona and Pittsburgh, still do three-year deals in the lower rounds; maybe there’s something to that).
I have always debated the value of paying an extra year’s prorated signing bonus to get the fourth year since the odds are that most of these players will wash out before then. The amount of extra bonus is negligible in the lower rounds but can be a couple hundred thousand different in the fourth and third rounds. However, if one or two of these players becomes a star, paying the proportionate amount of signing bonus to get that extra year is worth it for all.
The Escalator
In virtually every round but the second, the “backside” of the contract becomes a separate and important negotiation. The escalator delineates how a player will be compensated in the fourth year in the event he reaches certain performance levels. Those two issues -- how he will be compensated when reaching certain levels of performance and what levels of performance are the qualifiers – are the subjects of great debate.
AP2nd Round Pick Phil Loadholt
The First Level
Most teams will escalate the player to the draft round Right of First Refusal (ROFR) tender – for this year’s draft picks, their fourth year ROFR tender will be $1.308 million in 2012 – for one year of a requisite playtime, usually at about 35 percent.
Although the majority of teams only mandate one year of qualified playtime to earn the first-level escalator, some teams require two years of requisite playtime at a certain level to get the escalator (we did in Green Bay), the theory being that a backup player can fall into playtime one year due to an injury to the player or players ahead of them on the depth chart.
And although the majority of teams use the ROFR tender as the amount for the first-level escalator, some teams (the Eagles among them) prefer to use a number different than the ROFR number, hedging against a change in the CBA that may potentially raise that number as part of the negotiation.
The Second Level
APDolphins GM Jeff Ireland
A handful of teams will escalate to a second level – a higher amount based on superior performance such as a Pro Bowl or cumulative playtime of a high number, say 80 percent. There are about 10 teams that escalate beyond the first level to a higher amount for such performance. There are even a couple of teams (the Dolphins and Giants among them) that have multiple (up to six) escalator levels based on playtime and performance goals.
The theory of the second-level escalator is that, although it is certainly a tall task for an incoming player (especially in the later rounds) to achieve a Pro Bowl selection or cumulative playtime of 80 percent, the carrot of a higher escalator is one that’s a nice incentive for the player to have, no matter how hard to achieve.
As to how high, these second-level escalators usually raise the fourth year to the second-round restricted free agent tender, scheduled to be $2 million in 2012.
The point of the above is that each team is different and there is no standardization in these rookie contracts, making the negotiation much more about the “backside” of the contract than the signing bonus, especially in the later rounds.
Negotiations are all about two things: leverage and risk. The escalator is way to allocate risk in a player contract negotiation, incentivizing the player’s upside while protecting the team’s downside with a fourth year of the contract buying out the vagaries of restricted free agency.
Is restricted free agency status a good way of avoiding the extra cap commitment commitment?
It's so nice to read this site instead of today's update on what Brett Favre is doing, or wait-with-
Like NCOOL, I appreciate having something worth discussing outside the realm of popular gate-esque stories.
Mr Brandy wrote a very interesting article we appreciate.
Articles like this are the reason I read NFP. Can't wait for the season to start!
Andrew I was wondering after reading your article on comparing NBA and NFL salaries if you saw the NFL becoming something more along the lines of the MLB.
I know it sounds crazy at first, but the format is already there in regards to undrafted free agents where certain teams will steal away a player who is garnering lots of attention. The part where you say certain teams (the Giants and the Dolphins) have multiple escalator levels makes me think that if I were a player I sure would want to play for them, despite how unlikely it is to reach any of the levels.
Also, is the first escalator referred to as likely to be achieved money and thus included in the cap figure? I wouldn't think so because that would eliminate the whole reason why teams use an escalator to begin with.
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Looking back on an unconventional,...
Andrew and Sid discuss Ricky Williams,...
Also, Gruden’s extension, Adams’...
Andrew Brandt and Sid Rosenberg...
Still looming: How many will lose...
Jul 13, 2009
09:33 PM
Great article, Andrew... very inetresting. I wish you were still working for the Packers!