RSS

Something seems amiss in Stallworth case

Money and fame buy Browns receiver a light sentence, but Goodell has the last word. Andrew Brandt

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This June 19, 2009, 09:38 AM EST
17 Comments

An exceedingly unfortunate series of events occurred in the early hours of Saturday, March 14 in Miami. A 59 year-old construction crane operator named Mario Reyes was rushing to catch a bus after finishing his overnight shift. Miles away, Browns receiver Donte’ Stallworth was spending the night partying at the bar of Miami Beach’s elegant Fountainebleau hotel. Stallworth was likely celebrating his $4.5-million roster bonus payment from the Browns, negotiated as part of a “second signing bonus” in his $35-million contract with $10 million guaranteed in March of 2008.

Stallworth and Reyes, two people who otherwise would never have come into contact, met in a truly tragic manner. On the way home from his celebratory night, Stallworth’s Bentley struck and killed Reyes, who allegedly was not in the crosswalk at the time. Stallworth had a blood-alcohol level of .126 after the crash, well above Florida’s .08 limit. In the blink of an eye, the lives of Stallworth and – much more tragically – the Reyes family (including Mario Reyes’ 15-year-old daughter) were irrevocably changed. Stallworth was charged with DUI manslaughter, which carries a possible maximum sentence of 15 years in prison.

Donte StallworthAPStallworth is heading to jail for 30 days.

The plea bargain – one month in jail followed by two years of house arrest, eight years of probation and 1,000 hours of community service – hardly seems to fit the crime. Indeed, I’ve heard many cries of selective justice suggesting that an ordinary person – not a professional athlete with considerable resources – would not have been able to secure that deal.

Those cries are, well, accurate. Resources and fame do buy some favorable treatment in the judicial system; we would be naïve to think otherwise. Moreover, I wonder if prosecutors worried about potential problems with a jury trial for someone who was cooperative at the scene, called the police, reached out to the victim’s family and had some name recognition among most prospective jurors (on a much different scale, since this week is the anniversary of the white Bronco low-speed police chase, it was clear then that no matter what the evidence, a jury in Los Angeles was not going to convict O.J. Simpson).

Stallworth’s financial resources were very much in play in the leniency of his plea bargain. Stallworth’s negotiated settlement with the victim’s family staved off a potential wrongful death civil suit and ensured some measure of good will on the criminal side of the case. Again, we do not need to be naïve to the fact that the defendant had some financial advantages here that most defendants do not.

Stallworth’s team, the Cleveland Browns, crafted a statement saying very little, but their actions have spoken louder than their words. After the incident on March 14, the Browns signed two veteran receivers – David Patten on March 23 and Mike Furrey on May 5 -- and drafted two receivers, Brian Robiskie and Mohamed Massaquoi, in the second round of the draft in April, ensuring them spots on the roster. These signings spoke volumes about Stallworth’s future on the team.

It’s interesting that the Browns hung on to Stallworth even before the incident. Signed as a marquee free agent, he had a disappointing year with only 17 receptions for 170 yards and one touchdown. With a new coach and a new system, the possibility of being released was certainly there, although $10M guaranteed does provide some job security. Unless, of course, something like this happened.

Stallworth must now deal with an indefinite suspension from Commissioner Roger Goodell as a result of the Personal Conduct Policy, probably as a free agent. And there is precedent here. Leonard Little of the Rams pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter after he hit and killed a woman while driving drunk in 1998. Little served a 90-day jail sentence and then an eight-game suspension from the league.

Roger GoodellAPCommissioner Goodell acted swiftly, suspending Stallworth indefinitely.

Compared to Little, there are a couple forces at work here. On the minus side for Stallworth, 1998 was an eternity from the NFL’s present handling of conduct issues. That would potentially warrant a more severe punishment. In Stallworth’s defense -- and already emphatically stated by his criminal and personal attorney David Cornwell -- unlike Little, Stallworth was responsible about his crime, called the police and stayed at the scene throughout the ordeal. That, however, is of little comfort to the commissioner, who is sending a message far beyond Donte’ Stallworth.

The Personal Conduct Policy, a well-intentioned plan with a mission to maintain and restore public confidence and integrity in the league, its teams and its players, has been put off track lately due to the actions of high-profile offenders such as Michael Vick, Pacman Jones and Plaxico Burress. Stallworth presented the commissioner with an open door to make a strong statement where the judicial system had not, and he walked right through it.

There are some events – like this one -- that cause a front office to know in its private meetings that the player will not be a member of that franchise again. It’s likely that the moment upper management and ownership of the Falcons heard the graphic details of Vick’s dogfighting operation, they knew he would never again be an active member of the Falcons.

When I was with the Packers in 1999 and we discovered that Mark Chmura was caught in a compromising position with a teenage girl at a post-prom party – an allegation of sexual assault for which he was eventually acquitted – we knew it was unlikely he would play for the Packers again (we drafted Bubba Franks, a tight end, in the first round of the draft a couple of weeks later). Chmura was a popular person and player, but his life changed in the blink of an eye due to some questionable judgment.

The unfortunate part for the Browns, and fortunate part for Stallworth, is that the day before his unfortunate accident, Stallworth earned his 2009 guaranteed roster bonus of $4.5M, perhaps triggering the celebratory night he had in Miami Beach. He was paid $2.25M in May and due the other $2.25M in 2010.

As per arbitration rulings and the present Collective Bargaining that allows only for forfeiture of signing, not roster, bonuses, the Browns would have difficulty trying to get back any of that amount and even more difficulty if they release Stallworth. Most recently, an arbitrator ruled that Burress’s gun incident was not “willful misconduct” that would trigger bonus forfeiture, another blow to teams’ efforts to recover money as a result of bad behavior. And sadly, it’s possible that the roster bonus money earned by Stallworth on the eve of his accident – half paid in May -- could have provided the resources for a financial settlement to the victim’s family.

Stallworth, 28, will spend a month without his liberty while a pedestrian getting off work and trying to catch a bus is lost forever. Despite the NFL’s harsh reaction on the football side, something still seems amiss. In this case, the wheels of justice had a flat.

FINAL WORD …

On a personal note, another life was taken far too soon. Luke Cole, a friend from Stanford who spent his life helping the less fortunate and the environment, died in a head-on collision on a rural road in Uganda earlier this week. May he and his benevolent spirit rest in peace.

Enjoy your weekend.

Happy 50th to our Michael Lombardi.

Follow me on Twitter: adbrandt.

Comments

Add a Comment
Flip
Jun 20, 2009
06:05 PM

There is simply no way to compare Stallworth to OJ or Vick. Stallworth was driving drunk when he became involved in an ACCIDENT. That is the key word here. Dante did not maliciously go out and willfully and maliciously kill the guy.
Vick intentionally killed dogs.
Thus is the big issue. Accidentally killing a person is better in the eyes of people then intentionally killing man's best friend. Think of it more this way. If I were to intentionally break your sun glasses, you would be pissed. But, if I were to accidently break your nose, it might hurt, but you would understand as it was an accident.

I think people are naive if they actually think that the family took the cash and told prosecutors to just push things under the rug. I have no doubt that the family probably wanted a stronger sentence for losing their loved one.

The prosecutor had to make the plea deal, because of the possibility of jnot being able to find a viable jury pool, plus the fact that the guy was jay walking. Jay walking is a ticketable offense in most parts of the country, it is just not enforced. Thus the prosecutor might have thought that the jury could side with Stallworth.

One of my issues with how Goodell weilds his power is the fact that he weilds it heavily. I know that there have been quite a few off field problems, but if I were arrested for fighting or a dui, would my employer give me a pink slip, or suspending me from my job?
The other thing I do not like is how he takes him time with suspensions, while in other cases he leaves things up in the air. Ala, Marshall , Burress and now Stallworth. If Goodell is going to weild that sword, use ti swiftly, or wait til the legalities of cases are worked out. In the NFL, you are guilty until proven innocent, Is this a fair practive not only for the players, but also the teams.

What has happened has happened, Stallworth is paying his debt to society, while the burdon of what he has done will haunt him for the remainder of his life.

Mr.Murder
Jun 20, 2009
07:04 PM

Allowing Stallworth's return would let the victim's family earn some form of compensation due their loss as well.

matt
Jun 21, 2009
10:47 PM

Nice post Flip.

I think most people are letting the fact that Stallworth was drinking cloud their judgment in this case.

Lets say he had been totally sober and hit him - it's just a tragic accident. No one anywhere would be complaining about Stallworth walking with no liability to the family and no time served

But because he had been drinking (key here, been drinking, not necessarily impaired, although legally drunk), people think he should go to jail forever and lose all his money and all this garbage.

If you want to argue that his sentence should have been worse, then you have to convince me, a judge, and a pool of our peers (assuming they're sensible, logical people) that the MAIN reason this event happened was Stallworth's drinking, and if he had refrained from drinking, would never have happened.

THAT"S IMPOSSIBLE. I'm sorry, but if you try to cross a highway without using a crosswalk and on anything other than a red light, logic tells us there's a reasonable chance you could get hit by a car. So Stallworth should lose all his money and freedom because a guy took a chance crossing the street without thinking?? Get real.

jeff
Jun 22, 2009
09:42 AM

How can you even try to compare Stallworth to Vick. Stallworths crime was driving while impaired, his accident was striking a pedestrian who was not following the rules of a pedestrian crossing the street. Vick planned, paid for torture showing meditation. Tried to hide the evidence from police, tried to say he was not involved, and when this tactic did not work he blamed his family and friends. Stallworth stayed at the scene offered assistance, and you don't think he was concious of the fact he could go to jail, and even if he didn't he was going to be suspended for some time by the new administration. Your right if he doesn't play he can't pay the settlement money, but i think the family also looked at what Mario Reyes did wrong and Stallworth still showed remorse.

Don't i love justice in America. Not always, but even worse is when the media compares a man taking responsibility for his actions, to several low lifes. Vick who was convicted and OJ who was let go. Both lied about many things to the court.

Wait to see if this man makes public appearances to speak against driving while impaired, watch his actions to see if he violates his two years of house arrest. With all these players saying they are not guilty it is refreshing to see someone who says i am a football player and now that i am at my worst i will act like a responsible citizen.

Yeah
Jun 22, 2009
11:33 AM

This is tragic all the way around. While I agree with those of you saying it was "not intentional" and it was "an accident", I believe the fact that he was drinking and then CHOSE to drive automatically makes it "intentional". He willfully chose to get into and try to maneuver 2,000-lb weapon.

I do applaud Stallworth for having the courage to stay at the scene, call for help, and just generally stand up like a man and accept his punishment. If I were on a jury in this case, that would mean a lot to me.

He does deserve a little more jail time, though. At least one year's suspension from the NFL. Aside from that, it's a confusing situation about which it's hard to form a solid opinion. There are good, bad and horrible aspects of this for ALL involved. All involved, including Stallworth, deserve our respect and sympathies. I do not believe he went out looking to kill someone, but he did make the decision to drive knowing full well that the probability for an accident increased exponentially for every drink he had.

Fantastic article, Andrew.

Next 13 - 17 of 17 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)