Pittsburgh has a chance on Saturday night to validate its coach. Dave Miller
When Dave Wannstedt’s Pittsburgh Panthers fell to Charlie Weis’ Notre Dame Fighting Irish by three touchdowns in the opening game of their collegiate coaching careers, many college football experts thought Wannstedt wouldn’t last the length of his contract. Conversely, nearly everyone—most importantly, ND brass—believed that Weis would be able to deliver the Irish their first national title since 1988. Weis received a mega contract extension the following season and South Bend was seemingly once again the college football capital of the world.
A lot has changed since then.
APDave Wannstedt is leading the revival of the University of Pittsburgh football.
After that 2005 opener which saw both Wannstedt and Weis leading their alma maters, both men have traveled down divergent paths after high expectations were placed upon them to instantly change the culture of their new programs and return the teams to national prominence.
Saturday evening at Heinz Field, the two meet again under very different circumstances.
Wannstedt’s Panthers have soared to No. 8 in the AP poll, as they’re off to their best start since the Dan Marino-led ’82 team. Sitting at No. 12 in the BCS standings, Pittsburgh finds itself on the brink of a big payday if it can win the Big East—a difficult task as West Virginia and Cincinnati close out the schedule following the tilt with the Irish.
No matter what happens the rest of the way, however, Wannstedt’s days on the weekly hot seat—the one currently occupied by Weis—are over, and with good reason. While many expected this game to be a walk in the park for the Irish on their way to a BCS berth, the Panthers—despite not having a win over a top-20 team—have stolen the thunder.
Wannstedt has managed to put together a campaign that only he and his players have thought possible. Behind a defense that leads the nation in sacks with 38 and leads the Big East in total defense, the Panthers have held their last three opponents to less than 300 yards and have won five straight since a 38-31 setback to North Carolina State.
Quarterback Bill Stull is much improved under new offensive coordinator Frank Cignetti, supported by his 17-to-4 touchdown-to-interception ratio and 68 percent completion percentage. He’ll have plenty of chances to rack up yardage against a Notre Dame team that has given up 38 pass plays of 20 yards or longer—the same problem the Irish have had year after year and one area that has yet to get fixed under Weis.
APWannstedt has proven that he can recruit the talent needed to win at the BCS-conference level.
Not only is Stull quickly becoming a household name across the country but shifty freshman running back Dion Lewis has picked up where LeSean McCoy left off, tallying over 1100 yards and 12 TDs on the season, including going over the 110-yard mark six times and having five multi-TD games.
Pittsburgh football has never been hotter, as the Wannstedt era has been marked by progress on the field and recruiting success off of it.
Yet there are still some who wonder whether or not Wannstedt is capable of sustaining consistency and bringing stability to the program.
A look at Wannstedt’s career record at Pittsburgh:
2005: 5-6 (4-3)
2006: 6-6 (2-5)
2007: 5-7 (3-4)
2008: 9-4 (5-2) lost in Sun Bowl
2009: 8-1 (5-0)
After compiling a 16-19 mark in his first three seasons, Wannstedt has begun to answer his critics. He is 17-5 since then, and the Panthers have a chance to prove that the Big East is a legitimate BCS-worthy league. What better proving ground than a primetime showdown against Notre Dame?
APTaking over for Mike Ditka as Chicago Bears head coach, Wannstedt was doomed from the start.
Why does there seem to be concern about Wannstedt’s coaching ability, year in and year out?
Well, as a lifelong Chicagoan, Wannstedt’s legacy in this city will always be that of an inept head coach—a coordinator who knows the game well but doesn’t have what it takes to be a head coach. In my opinion, that has more to do with the fact that Wannie followed a “legend” in Mike Ditka as Bears head coach. I love Ditka as a brand, but wasn’t he partly to blame for the internal strife that cost the club a potential Super Bowl repeat in 1986?
Don’t get me wrong Chicago. Ditka’s run from ’84-88 was superb, and his ’90 and ’91 campaigns were excellent. He was a good coach. But it seems as though Bears fans can’t let go of him. Just ask Lovie Smith.
The bottom line is that Wannstedt didn’t have a chance to succeed in Chicago because he wasn’t Da Coach. And I feel that a lot of that pessimism about Wannstedt’s coaching potential spread across the country and followed him to Pittsburgh.
Dolphins fans? Well, there’s no question that his lack of playoff success still probably has you steaming mad. Let me remind you, though: one losing season. One. Ten-win and 9-win seasons without a postseason? Not too shabby either.
But now he has a chance to change the national perception of him and his program.
Saturday evening at Heinz Field will serve as the perfect backdrop for Wannstedt’s signature moment at Pittsburgh “Don’t call me Pitt” University. His defining moment up to this point has been knocking off West Virginia two seasons ago in the Backyard Brawl. But for me, that was more about what West Virginia lost than what Pittsburgh gained.
Saturday night, like most times in college sports, is all about the coaches—specifically the one who was never given a chance from the very beginning.
Dave Miller is the Web Manager of the National Football Post and an unfortunate hopeless romantic. After receiving his Masters in Writing from DePaul University in Chicago, he realized that he would never be John Updike so he returned to a sports career. He enjoys coffee at any time of the day, CW teen dramas and has an appreciation for girls in boots. You can follow him on Twitter at Miller_Dave, where he constantly chronicles every moment of his mundane life.
Pittsburgh “Don’t call me Pitt” University???? WTH is that??? Have you been living in a cave for the past few years???
FYI.....Our main logo says PITT, it says PITT on our football jersey and helmets, and also our basketball uniforms. It also says PITT on the 50 yd line at Heinz Field, and at halfcourt on our basketball floor it says PITT.
and finally we're called the University of Pittsburgh......not Pittsburgh University, get it right.
Because he wasn't "Da Coach"? More like because he was the GM and couldn't draft for crap. Marcus Spears? Todd Sauerbrun? John Thierry? Patrick Riley? Rashaan Salaam? John Allred? Bob Sapp?
All the places were in pieces.
One more thing: Where does his work as the Miami Dolphins head coach fit in to his resume?
Chuck- Wannie will live to regret that quote for sure. You're right, he was a terrible NFL personnel man. Based on his recruiting success he is much more suited for the college game. And he was head coach of the Dolphins post-Jimmy Johnson after JJ brought him on board.
Cee- As an admirer of Jamie Dixon's style of coaching and personality, I am indeed familiar with the "Pitt" logo. I was merely poking fun at the hoopla years ago when the administration did in fact state that they didn't want to be referred to as "Pitt," as well as when people get upset at the misuse of "University of." Thanks for commenting.
brasilbear- I wish more Chicago fans were as knowledgeable as you.
I am proud to have Wanny as our coach at Pitt. I think you hit the nail on the head that all the negativity regarding his success and failures in the NFL were generally because he was not the correct fit for his position. At Pitt he is in a position where he could 1. build a team without huge NFL expectations 2. work with young amateur players who are eager to learn 3. He had the time to endear himself to the school while achieving good results. Face it, for all his faults, he is a heck of a likable guy and I think if he stays here and has some sustained success which carries over into the post-Wanny era at Pitt he will erase most of the negativity from his coaching legacy.
Pitt football has certainly been hotter as evidenced by the Nine National Titles that accrue to Pitt football throughout it's long history, although most were in the leather helmet days.
I wasn't aware that one person could slip so many backhanded compliments into one missive.
By the way DW hardly took over a juggernaut in Chicago. He inherited a 5-11 team and won the Division within 2 years.
It's the University of Pittsburgh, not Pittsburgh University.
I'm sure Wannstedt is gloating now that his PR skills and glib personality provide the perfect coverup for some major deficiencies as a head coach. This article was written when Pitt was a a ranked team with one loss. Now, after finally playing two teams ranked, they have two losses.
I hope Wannstedt does great things at Pitt. But it's year five and he hasn't won the promised Big East Championship and dear God, is no where close to a national championship. I'm sorry. I see Pitt as capable of being the very best - not the flawed version Wannstedt produces. True, he may be doing the best coaching of his career - but it is not good enough.
I assume the writer always liked being number two. Are you proud of Wannstedt's 9 win seasons as a pro coach with no division titles? If you are, please go back to writing romance novels.
Former Mr. Irrelevant made 10...
Alabama nose guard to visit Ravens,...
Wide receiver recovering from...
Titans coach is an advocate of...
Dolphins running back hires Drew...
Nov 12, 2009
11:31 AM
Bobby Engram, Marcus Robinson, Olin Kreutz...are the only players from 5 years of drafting in the Wanny era, during which he had total control of the organization.
Not being like Ditka wasn't Wanny's problem, it was his complete ineptitude at drafting, game planning, etc, etc
That and the famous..."All the pieces are in place" quote prior to the 96 season, which saw the Bears finish 7-9 and led to the two 4-12 season that cost Wanny his job.
Please don't assume that all Bears fans still wish Ditka was here. Its a caricature of us in general, and you're a better columnist than that.