Is the Wildcat here to stay?
It seems that we can’t get through a day this summer without talking about the wildcat offense that’s supposedly taking the NFL by storm, just as the triple option did to college football in the 1980s and the spread is doing in the present day with quarterbacks like Tim Tebow of Florida.
APTebow has made the Spread Option a dangerous offense at Florida.
In an interesting read by John Clayton of ESPN, a majority of coaches think the wildcat offense is going to be around the league for a while.
I agree — to an extent — because defensive coaches have had an entire offseason to dissect this scheme on film and come up with ways to shut it down. And just like the run-and-shoot we used to see down in Houston with the Oilers, this offense will become extinct after time.
The Dolphins and Ronnie Brown introduced us to it last year and actually took it to one of the better defensive minds in Bill Belichick — well, the first time. But it’s now sexy, something the media loves to write about, and it’s here — for 2009, at least.
But when do we feel comfortable enough to say that when teams line up in the wildcat it’s a dead play? First, we need to realize that there are two separate ways an offense can attack with the wildcat.
One way is taking a player like Chicago’s Devin Hester, a pure athlete who doesn’t force the threat of the pass. What we’re seeing here is the basic spread option from the college game, and as a defense, you can attack it differently.
The second is to take a player such as Miami’s Pat White, who can run and pass, bringing more threat to a defense. With White, a defense now has to play not only the spread option but also the entire passing tree from this formation.
Two different attacks, and hopefully, two different solutions.
How do we stop it?
APExpect to see Hester in Chicago's version of the Wildcat this season.
I reached out to some people in the league this morning with the wildcat on my mind, because gimmick offenses bother me as an ex-defensive back. But gimmick or not, until you stop an offense — regardless of the scheme — they will continue to run it.
I talked to one NFC defensive coach who said the best way to stop the wildcat when a player like Hester is lined up behind center is to bring pressure — force the offense to throw the ball when you have a “non-thrower” handling it. The same goes for a player who’s in there to throw the football -- play coverage and force him to run. The teams that have a hard time are playing with seven-man fronts and rush up the field — without any discipline. Who has the dive? Who has the pitch? And who has the QB in the option attack?
However, we always come back to a player like White, which is why this offense is so successful at the college level — because spread-option quarterbacks in college are athletes and not drop-back passers that the NFL looks for in the top 10 of the draft.
One AFC defensive back told me that it’s all about playing solid technique up front. He credits that discipline to teams such as the Baltimore Ravens, saying you can’t “swap out one for one,” meaning each player has a responsibility to play against the option, and giving up one player for one blocker usually leads to a big play.
And I agree with him. Just turn on a tape of the Ravens and it’s obvious they play with discipline against the wildcat.
But are their other ways, other options and other schemes? I talked to a former NFL safety with lots of experience in the league and in college coaching who talked about a different avenue that’s used in the college game.
APWhite ran the Spread Option at West Virginia.
According to him, most teams play a version of Cover 4 (quarters) and walk their safeties up to 6-8 yards, becoming a nine-man front and allowing you to play 11-on-11 football. Safeties can play the option from a flatfoot read and play the pass based off their run-pass keys at the line of scrimmage.
But it always comes back to personnel, as explained to me by a former NFL GM, who said that the players who run the wildcat are the keys. A versatile player like White allows this offense to expand and actually allows it to become more than just a gimmick we see on Saturdays in the fall.
Look, I’m fully convinced that until someone stops this offense cold one series after another, it will continue to be used. But as effective as it can be, it always takes the ball out of the hands of your starting quarterback at the NFL level.
Those guys get paid millions to throw touchdowns and run their offenses — not to sit out near the sidelines and run fake routes.
However, I can talk all I want because I don’t have to stop it — just write about it.
Matt, The Linc has a good point . Why not just level the starting QB every time he is split out wide?
I totally agree with you Linc. A cornerback should have totally creamed Chad Pennington when he was lined up at wide receiver.
Doesn't the defense of the Wildcat ultimately come down to the safeties and linebackers? If you see a RB taking a snap, then the LBs crowd the line to play the run. The safeties should be able to cover the field (especially if a QB is running a route).
Clayton's article talks about using formations where the normal QB won't even be on the field. But doesn't that hurt the Wildcat? Isn't part of its success due to its surprise? Seems like it'll be easier to defend if the defense recognizes immediately, based of the sub package, that the Wildcat is coming.
Jimmy-
Most of the time, the corner in that situation plays off-man coverage and looks to help out in other areas of the field... different than lining up over the WR...
But, I see your point about lining up in press coverage and putting him on the ground.
Hester and the wildcat didn't bring the Bears that much success last year because they ran only one play out of it... a sweep.
The wildcat isn't unstoppable.... Baltimore shut it down and NE stopped it the second time they played Miami last year. It worked early on because of the element of surprise.....
Good point Linc. I think the wildcat will go one of two ways. First, and most probable, the Pats showed everyone last year how to stop the wildcat when you have a non-passing threat. That right there takes away half of the offense. I don't think it will take DCs very long to figure out ways to slow down the wildcat passing attack so it will die off. Especially when OCs are running the risk of watching their high priced QB get rocked every play like Linc mentioned.
Assuming the PA and the leauge hammer out a new CBA, it's a safe assumption that rookies won't make as much money coming out, so that cuts down on the number of high-priced QBs in the leauge. Less expense makes them a little more expendable so we might see more 2nd class QBs being drafted. White is a perfect example. If Miami didn't run the Wildcat, there's no way Pat would have gone in the second, or even third round or fourth round. I think it's a long shot, but the Wildcat may actually lead to a slight decline in the demand for the typical pure pocket passing franchise QB.
Well Pennington may not be an NFL caliber athlete at any position other than QB, but he probably still has 5 inches and 35 pounds on most NFL CB's. NFL QB's are often bigger and stronger than cornerbacks, not as easy to rough up as you make it sound.
I think a basic 46 defense would do the trick without requiring additional personnel.
Just another fad until Pat White is taken off on a cart after he realizes that he isn't running the option against Syracuse anymore.
whats the difference between the wildcat offense and the offense atlanta ran with mike vick?
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Revis vs. Moss and Fortenbaugh...
Henne helps out, but Williams...
The NFP's Matt Bowen picks every...
Could this mark the end of the...
Bowen and Rosenberg discuss the...
Jul 09, 2009
02:01 PM
I keep expecting the defense to cream the QB when he gets split out as a WR. Go throw some big hits on him, that'll make coaches think twice about putting their franchise QB out there for wildcat plays.