RSS

Why players hold out

Who’s at fault, the player or the team? Jack Bechta

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This July 28, 2009, 01:30 PM EST
18 Comments

Jerry JonesAPJerry Jones

Before I became a full-time agent, I always had a very passionate opinion about holdouts by pro athletes. I couldn’t imagine that a deal couldn’t be reached and wondered why a player would want to miss one day or one month working for an NFL team. My first thoughts were always that the player and/or his agent were being greedy. And the media often explained the reason behind the holdout by reporting one side, usually the team’s.

Once I began representing higher-round draft choices in the early 1990s, I learned firsthand why players hold out: They’re usually not being treated fairly. I’m not saying it’s always the team’s fault, but it often is.

You must understand that when a player is drafted by an NFL team, he has no other option but to negotiate only with that team. If he can’t reach an agreement, he doesn’t have the right to say, “Sorry, Mr. Jones, but I don’t think you’re treating me fairly so I’m going to see if Mr. Snyder will give me a better deal.” As a result, teams know they have the leverage in their exclusivity. Additionally, many players and their families panic once camp starts and a deal is not done. Teams also know this to be commonplace, so some will test the player’s nerves.

A majority of players will listen to their agents when a contract is not reached by the start of camp. The holdout is not a strategy, it’s a reaction, the only way a player can say, “You’re not treating me fairly.” I should add, when rookies don’t make it to camp on time it technically should not be called a holdout because they’re not under contract. Veterans under contract can hold out.

Knowshon MorenoAPKnowshon Moreno

When the agents are the problem

There have been certain agents or agencies over the past decade that have a history of not getting their rookie deals done in time for camp. We in the industry know who they are. Their methods are downright militant at times. They convince their clients that they have to “send a message” to ownership and that the team needs them more than they need the team. These agents usually try to get an unreasonable premium by holding the player hostage. Unfortunately, these guys think they’re working in the best interest of their clients. Most of the time, they’re trying to make names for themselves.

There is also a growing concern and frustration among general managers about one large agency that’s working at its own pace and disregarding camp opening dates. Four GMs and three team negotiators I’ve spoken to over the past seven days have told me that this firm is dictating its own timetable for getting deals done based on the order of draft picks they represent and the location of those picks in the first round. I’m being told that there’s no sense of urgency from this firm and that it won’t start talking seriously until camps open. My problem is that this strategy is not openly disclosed to players when they sign with the firm. The deals will ultimately get done, as they always do, but players may miss a week or more that they don’t have to.

The wait and see

Many agents, and even teams, hate doing deals until they get to see what deals or slots came in above or below them. They simply hate looking bad among their peers since early deals can be easily leap-frogged by later deals. So if an agent’s deal is inferior to others in the same round, his competitors will use it against him while recruiting next year’s class of clients. What happens is that everybody waits until the last minute. There’s a lot of that going on right now.

Michael CrabtreeAPMichael Crabtree

The position premium

Many times, if an agent has a player drafted in the first round – let’s say a quarterback with the 10th pick -- the agent will make a case that he’s worth more than slots 9, 8 and/or 7 because he’s a QB. The team doesn’t like it because it has only allocated formulated cap dollars based on the slot, not the player’s position. But I personally believe that sometimes the slotting system has to be thrown out for QBs. I also think the agent for WR Michael Crabtree is trying to make the case that the slotting theory doesn’t apply to his client because he’s a special receiver who would have been a top three pick if he were not injured before the draft. I don’t see a problem with his position, but I’m sure the 49ers will.

The bottom line is that the average career of an NFL player lasts 3.5 years. It’s the agent’s job to see that he gets the most he can since he may never make it to a second contract.

Painters, plumbers, teachers and pipefitters have unions. CEOs have high-priced attorneys. Players have agents. Don’t begrudge a young man for getting the most the market can bear for his unique services. And don’t always believe what you read in the media about a holdout because you might not know what side the information is coming from. Be patient with the process and don’t judge a player because he didn’t make to camp on time. The players are usually clueless regarding the politics of team and agent procedures.

This year, I see more holdouts coming as owners tighten their purse strings and the larger agencies are more concerned about their competition than their clients. There has to be a better way.

Follow me on Twitter: jackbechta

Comments

Add a Comment
Winston
Jul 28, 2009
01:48 PM

I also heard many players make it annual tradition to miss TC. For example, Ken Ruetgers of the Packers always seemed to miss camp. Not sure where I heard it but it seemed common knowledge that his goal was to miss camp and that this was a common practice. Maybe this falls into the "don't believe everything you hear"?

To be honest, what some of the coaches put these guys through back in the day, I wouldn't blame them for missing camp!!

Yeah
Jul 28, 2009
02:26 PM

Good points, Jack. I hadn't considered that the agent is probably controlling the whole situ because of draft order, etc. However, I'd like to see a football player buck up and say "get the deal done" because "I want to get on the field." If he's really WORTH all that money then he WILL get a second contract. Why give him "two contracts' worth" of money just because he "might not" get a second? Boy I wish I had an agent that said, "Don't go to work today. We'll bully them into paying you three times what you are worth just in case you get an infected paper cut that prevents you from being hired by another firm in the future."

Yeah. Sounds good.

Professor
Jul 28, 2009
02:41 PM

Hey Jack, wlecome back. I'm sure you've had a busy, and hopefully successful, week of negotiations.

When you mention that one large agency who works on their own timetable, two people pop into my head.....Rosenhaus and Eugene Parker. Although I would love to know if I'm right, I don't expect you to confirm my suspision. I think it will probably be obvious in the next few days what agency it is.

You say the player should be told what negotiation tactics will be used when they sign with an agent. If a player is unhappy with the progress, or lack of, an agent is making, doesn't he have the option of firing the agent he signs with and just find another one that will get a deal done? Does this not happen because of the mandatory waiting period between agents?

Jack
Jul 28, 2009
02:58 PM

Sounds like a great argument for slotting rookie contracts. If only either side of the CBA cared enough to make it an issue.

meateater
Jul 28, 2009
03:01 PM

I don't understand the Crabtree logic. "If I hadn't been hurt, I would have been a top three pick." But he was hurt. The Niners took a chance on him. If he were still hurt, would he be willing to take 3rd round money? I doubt it seriously. Anyway, how does he know where he would have been drafted?

Mark
Jul 28, 2009
03:44 PM

Bechta,

The World's Smallest Violin cranks out the latest rap tune for every unsigned first-round draft pick, Drew Rosenhaus, and the rest of the agents in the game.

I'm perfectly amenable to allowing players to hold out - provided the player, every member of his family, the player's agent, and every member of his/her family is waterboarded LIVE on national television every day that the player misses training camp.

DWRinAZ
Jul 28, 2009
03:53 PM

If I'm the 49ers I'd be very leary of Crabtree, hus attitude has bust stamped all over it. I'd guess the new CBA will alter things but if not then sooner or later a team will boot a #1 pick to the curb. Especially a potential diva. Plenty of "1st round picks" fall to the 2nd round or later. If a guy is drafted #10 then he's entitled to that slotting. If he doesn't like it then let him try again next year...

Mike Ogden
Jul 28, 2009
07:24 PM

I would like to see some analysis on the career impact of lengthy holdouts on top 10 draftees. Is the extra million on top of millions always worth the setback of significant delays in getting to the first camp, particularly for quarterbacks? How many times has a first season been a lost season because of a long holdout, and in those cases, how many of those players went on to receive high-dollar second contracts? A statistical breakdown of this would make for a great follow-up article. What is the "bust" rate for top-10 rookies who hold out for seven days or longer? Something like this.

draft111
Jul 29, 2009
06:14 AM

The average career for an NFL player is 3.5 years..but you are only talking about players who hold out (i.e. first round picks).

The correct statistic would have to be the average career for an NFL first round pick...and I have to imagine that is around 8+ years.

virtueandvice
Jul 29, 2009
03:05 PM

Since none of CAA's rookie 1st round clients have signed contracts, I would guess you are refering to Tom Condon when speaking of one large agency that’s working at its own pace and disregarding camp opening dates. I think I share the frustration of most fans when trying to understand how so many mid 1st round guys are not in camp.

Jason Bailey
Jul 29, 2009
08:17 PM

Adding to Meateater's point, the Crabtree "logic" is simply asinine:

If Crabtree's agent really tries to argue that point, the 49ers should simply say "If we didn't draft Crabtree, he would, at best, be the 11th overall selection. We'll offer him 11th overall money."

Jason Bailey
Jul 29, 2009
08:29 PM

Adding to Meateater's point, the Crabtree "logic" is simply asinine:

If Crabtree's agent really tries to argue that point, the 49ers should simply say "If we didn't draft Crabtree, he would, at best, be the 11th overall selection. We'll offer him 11th overall money."

Next 1 - 12 of 18 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)