FROM MICHAEL LOMBARDI:
23 February 2009
QUOTE: “All of the great leaders have had one characteristic in common: it was the willingness to confront unequivocally the major anxiety of their people in their time. This, and not much else, is the essence of leadership.” ~ John Kenneth Galbraith, U.S. economist, “The Age of Uncertainty”
FROM RICH CIMINI OF THE NEW YORK DAILY NEWS... On a day in which the Jets released one offensive stalwart, tight end Chris Baker, and moved close to unloading another, guard Brandon Moore, the ever-confident Rex Ryan predicted greatness for Gang Green's defense in 2009. The new coach, speaking Friday at the NFL Scouting Combine, said the defense is only one or two players away from becoming as good as the vaunted unit he left behind in Baltimore. One of those players could be Ray Lewis. The Jets are interested in pursuing the Ravens' aging star as a free agent, according to league sources. The free-agent signing period begins Friday. Comfortably under the salary cap, the Jets are prepared to splurge for a big-ticket free agent, especially with sources claiming the team has no immediate plans to make a big investment at quarterback. Lewis is one of the most accomplished linebackers in history, but he comes with a "buyer beware" sticker.
The Jets have been very busy getting under the cap and have made several moves to accomplish this. I’ve been on the record saying the Jets were $34 million over the cap, and now they’re below the cap and in position to make moves at a few Baltimore linebackers.
Here’s what they did:
CUTS:
Brett Favre – saved $13 million of their ‘09 cap.
David Barrett – saved $5.1 million of their ‘09 cap
David Bowens – saved $2.6 million of their ‘09 cap.
Chris Baker -- saved $2.1 million of their ‘09 cap.
Brandon Moore -- saved roughly $5 million of their ‘09 cap.
These savings represent $27.8 million of their 2009 cap.
RENEGOTIATED:
Calvin Pace – saved $4.7 million on a restructured deal.
Kerry Rhodes – saved $4.9 million on a restructured deal.
These two renegotiated deals allowed the Jets pick up almost $10 million of cap room.
They had two deals that increased in value, probably due to an earned escalator:
Darrell Revis – increased by $5.7 million.
Dustin Keller – increased by $170,000.
Now that they have cap room, the Jets can make a move for Bart Scott and possibly Ray Lewis. While in Indy, I learned that all indications are that the Jets will sign Jim Leonhard, the safety from the Ravens, as soon as the free-agent market opens. This year, the Dolphins and the Jets will battle once again over a player, as reports from Indy suggest that both teams will “go to the mat” to obtain the services of Scott.
In addition, the word from Indy seems to suggest the Jets are happy with their quarterback situation and will allow Kellen Clemens and Brett Ratliff to compete for the starting position. All this cap room they created had many wondering if the Jets would go after a quarterback, but there seems to be very little indication that will happen.
Now that the Jets have the room, they need to fix some the areas of concern. It will be an interesting week of free agency.
FROM JASON LACANFORA OF THE WASHINGTON POST... The Redskins met with the agent for cornerback DeAngelo Hall, Joel Segal, Friday during the Combine at Indianapolis and were expected to continue talking throughout the week, a league source said. A deal was not imminent after the initial meeting, but the Redskins remain interested. Re-signing Hall is among the organization's top priorities. Owner Daniel Snyder and Vinny Cerrato, Washington's executive vice president of football operations, would prefer to get a deal done before Hall is permitted to consider offers from other teams, beginning Friday when the free agent market opens. We figure it would take something in the range of $15 million guaranteed to get it done. Considering how eager Snyder and Cerrato are to bring back Hall, he could get exactly what he wants. As always, stay tuned.
After talking to people with knowledge about what the ‘Skins might do, we were told they will probably trade Shawn Springs and are willing to allow teams to talk to his agent in an effort to redo his current contract. The ‘Skins seem willing to invest in DeAngelo Hall and get rid of Springs, thus allowing Hall to get on the field.
The ‘Skins are going to go after one major free agent and appear ready to spend a little money in the free agent market. Is it Albert Haynesworth? Is it Khalif Barnes from Jacksonville? It seems clear from doing research in Indy, the ‘Skins want to improve both lines.
FROM ADAM SCHEFTER OF NFL.COM... Adam Schefter of NFL.com is reporting that Texas Tech wide receiver Michael Crabtree has a slight fracture in his left foot. The injury, however, hasn't affected his running and there is still a chance he could run the 40-yard dash at the Combine. If he does injure his foot, he will have surgery immediately to insert screws. He could be out for 10 weeks. Crabtree plans to avoid that and have surgery on March 26.
I really don’t believe this will hurt Crabtree’s draft status. As long as he can run and rehab his injury before camp, most teams will overlook the injury and realize that when camp starts, he’ll be ready. There are no games today or tomorrow, so why overreact to the injury? Once he runs and undergoes surgery, he’ll be invited back to Indy in April for another exam and progress report. The critical concern here is a long-term injury, and that doesn’t seem to be the case.
FROM THE NFL COMBINE.... Andre Smith: “I had the chance to do it all over, I wouldn't have handled it the way I did," Smith said Saturday afternoon in his first public comments on the incident. "I should have told my group leader that I was leaving, and I didn't. I didn't mean to ruffle any feathers or step on any toes. I didn't mean to grandstand anyone at the Combine. That was not my intention at all, and I apologize for my mistake."
One thing you expect from offensive linemen is consistent behavior and work habits. Offensive linemen have to be tough, they have to be self-starters, and they have to be hard workers. Smith is showing the NFL he has some off-the-field concerns. Making mental mistakes off the field is not the right way to show your potential employers that you’re committed to being the best lineman in the NFL. Smith needs to grow up and realize this is a business, and he must act accordingly.
This latest episode will not take him out of the first round, but it might take him out of the top 10. When picking in the top 10, you must draft a player with as few off-the-field issues as possible. Smith seems to have let everyone in the NFL know he has some red flags. His agent, and Smith himself, must redefine him and start working hard to prove he loves the game, not just the perks.
Dave, having read the diner over the past 4 months or so, I have not seen a bias agianst the Jets. The Raiduhs maybe, not really but you have to love the "hotel" tag. At any rate, since you seem to be a Jet fan, I guess we know where the bias exists.
Dave Instead of the horrible cap situation, we Pat fans will have to settle for mentioning the Jets horrible QB situation :)
Q: How does a Jets fan spell 'Belichick disciple'?
A: "Bellicheck deciple", based on Dave's post
Mark...i wouldnt go beating your chest about your QB situation. As of now..you have 30 million in cap space tied up in brady..who..had an injury that no one ever comes back the same from..especially in year one.and cassel..who..is average at best..who couldnt take the 18-1 pats to the playoffs with the easiest schedule in the NFL..and.wont be the draft pick windfall that you think hes gonna be ..because..everyone knows your cap sitation. The most logical place is in KC..and we know Pioli isnt gonna hand you a bunch of picks for him
Saying the Pats had the easiest schedule based on 2007 records is like saying your 401(k) is doing well based on price quotes from a year ago--utterly meaningless.
In any case, the one thing we know for sure is Cassel won't be playing at $14.6M. If they can't move him, they'll sign him long-term to a more cap-friendly, more tradeable (in 2010) contract.
My son had ACL surgery on both his knees at different times, so I realize it's not a one year thing, which is why I think the Pats will keep Cassel. I'm surprised you think he's simply average.
The league will not trade for Cassel cuz he's a Patriot and nobody wants to risk helping the Patriots. The Pats best chance of winning next year is with Cassel on the roster, not a couple of rookies, so I'm fine with that.
Just to be clear, if Cassel played for any other team, there would be a bidding war for him. Small minds think alike and we're the better for it.
Im saying they had an easy schedule based on the records of the temas they played in 2008. Cassel only had 3 wins a gainst teams with a winning record.
How is NE going to negotiate a more "cap friendly" or "tradable" contract with Cassel? He signed the franchise tender. As of now, the Pat's get to write him a check for 14.6 million, no matter what happens. He could blow out his ACL tomorrow.
Cassel is obviously not going to take less than 14.6 million guaranteed, and anything more than 14.6 million guaranteed doesn't really qualify as a "trade friendly" contract, given the uncertainty about his long term viability.
I think NE fans need to get used to the fact that the Pats will be going into the 2009 season with 25% of their cap tied up in the QB position.
The issue for the Patriots is not how much they pay him--they can easily afford the $14.6M--but how much his cap hit is.
Here's but one possibility for cutting it in half, while giving him MORE than $14.6M guaranteed:
2009: $14.6M signing bonus, $4M guaranteed salary
2010: $5.2M guaranteed salary
2011: $6.4M salary
2012: $7.6M salary
2013: $8.8M salary
5 years/$47M, with $18.6M guaranteed in 2009 and yet a cap hit of <$7M the first year. And in future years, teams don't need to pay him the signing bonus, which would increase his trade value, while the Pats have the best backup in the league if, God forbid, something should happen.
And, BTW--I explicitly stated "in 2010." If the Pats extend him, they won't be able to trade him this year.
The bonus cannot surpass the base portion of a contract through its first three years. Has the failure to ratify a continuation on agreement altered the structure of contracts in addition to removing the cap?
The way most deals are stuctured with that in mind you are net zero the first year from a cut in that deal(usually year three) and the remaining accelerators or "guarantees" are usually roster bonus money which is a promise you will be cut or reneg more than it is cold hard cash, as per signing bonus.
Keep in mind the remainder of a contract and its acceleration can be cut into thirds. Teams don't normally disclose how they plan to pay that out so they can maximize supposed benefit in the short term of applying that amount to the background talks of other contracts in the same season.
In essence five year deals are usually three year deals with an out window past year two, etc.
And doesn't a trade accelerate the cap hit? Might not make a difference if the league goes uncapped, but otherwise you are accelerating the remainder of the pro-rated bonus onto the Patriots 2010 cap (if he is traded).
It just seems to make a lot more sense to just pay Cassel the 14.6 million this year, especially since Brady's status is uncertain.
And even under STI's hypothetical contract, I'm not sure too many teams are on board with a 23.5 million guaranteed contract for a trade, especially since it seems unlikely that the Pats can trade Cassel until July at the earliest (unless they are willing to roll the dice that Brady will be back and performing).
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Fox’s future in Carolina is tied...
Both have problems, but playoff...
Raiders QB lacks motivation and...
The best defense is sometimes...
Bills new coach must embrace the...
Feb 23, 2009
10:07 AM
Thanks for the clarification on the jets cap space Mike. I know you are anti Jet..being the Bellicheck deciple that you are but I was still surprised on how adamant you were abou the jets horrible 2009 cap situation when in fact..it just wasnt true. Everyone knows your cap situation in Jan for the following year is going to be significantly different by the time MArch rolls around. A few simple and obvious moves (Favre ,barrett, moore) and they are well under. I am happy tho that you addressed your obivously biased report