RSS

Diner Morning News: Assistant Coaches

Michael Lombardi

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This May 14, 2009, 10:23 AM EST
23 Comments

FROM MICHAEL LOMBARDI:

14 MAY 2009

QUOTE:  “The ancient Greek definition of happiness was the full use of your powers along lines of excellence.” -- John F. Kennedy (1917 - 1963) 

FROM MIKE CHAPPELL OF THE INDY STAR... Line coach Howard Mudd's formal retirement announcement could come as soon as today, and coordinator Tom Moore is in line to follow. Each is concerned with a recent change in the NFL's pension plan.  Neither Mudd, 67, nor Moore, 70, could be reached for comment, but Larry Kennan, executive director of the NFL Coaches Association, said he expects Mudd to file his retirement papers today. Team president Bill Polian declined an interview request from The Star to discuss the situation but told USA Today, "I anticipate that they will retire."

Coaches make a huge difference in the NFL. Being able to develop, motivate, evaluate and stimulate players requires talent, but coaching on game day requires quick thinking, which comes from years of experience. That’s one area where the loss of coaches like Howard Mudd and Tom Moore will affect the Colts. 

I thought I’d look at some of the assistant coaches who can make a difference this year for their teams. 

ROD MARINELLI                      CHICAGO BEARS         DEFENSIVE LINE

Rest assured, “The Peter Principle” exists in the NFL. It happens all the time. There’s a level of competence in each coach, and just because a coach is effective as a position coach doesn’t always mean he’ll be a successful head coach. Clearly, Rod Marinelli’s skill level as a coach didn’t make him suited to serve as a head coach in the NFL.  Even as the head coach of the Lions, he wanted to spend most of his time in the defensive line meetings making sure the defensive linemen were coached and taught in the style he loved. But now that his sole responsibility is the defensive line, he can focus on his strengths as a coach and improve the Bears’ defensive line (as Bears' GM Jerry Angelo told our Matt Bowen). Their season depends on Marinelli making his mark. 

I love the Jay Cutler move for the Bears, and I love that they were proactive and finally signed a few players to help their offensive line. I know the Orlando Pace signing is risky based on his injury history, but the Bears tell us that Pace passed their physical with flying colors and they’re not worried about his shoulder. If that holds true, they’ve helped themselves greatly. 

The Bears must -- and I mean must -- find a way to improve in all areas of their defense.  When I study them on tape, it’s obvious they struggle to play with consistency on every level or phase.  However, their defensive line fell well short of their talent level, creating problems for their linebackers, who had to deal with linemen coming to the second level freely.  They could not control the line of scrimmage with their defensive line; they had a hard time getting off the field, ranking 28th in the league in allowing opponents to control the ball (almost 32 minutes a game). For a defensive team that supposedly relies on speed and quickness to be successful, they failed to make the plays to get off the field. 

Marinelli must get Tommie Harris to play his best – that’s a given. However, more than Harris, Marinelli has to find a way to get edge pressure from his defensive ends. Pass rush pressure is the only solution to help their pass defense, which struggled last year, finishing 30th in the NFL.  For the Bears to become a good defensive team, Marinelli must develop Marcus Harrison into a powerful inside player. He must also get production from rookie Jarron Gilbert as either an edge rusher or a long, linear inside player who can create problems with his length and quickness.  His work must make an immediate impact; with the Packers and Steelers first on their schedule, the Bears’ defense needs to play well from the start.   

More than the players mentioned above, the significance of the Marinelli hiring for the Bears might lie in his ability to develop some unidentified young player who can make an impact this season. 

TURK SCHONERT                    BUFFALO BILLS                      OFFENSIVE COORDINATOR

I wonder if Turk has called down to Dallas and asked Jason Garrett what life is like coaching Terrell Owens. I hope he made the call, took meticulous notes and formulated a game plan because he’s approaching the most critical season in his coaching career. The Bills have to make the playoffs or there might be changes coming to Buffalo. Ralph Wilson, the owner of the Bills, wanted some changes to the staff this offseason, but because of head coach Dick Jauron’s insistence on continuity, no changes were made. 

The staff may not have changed, but the team is going to be very different in 2009. How these changes will be incorporated into the Bills’ base offense will be critical. Schonert must find a way to bring consistency to the offense. The Bills rarely make mistakes (which would indicate that they’re consistent, but they’re not) and were one of the least penalized offensive teams in the NFL, yet they cannot control the ball and finish drives. They fail to convert third downs in the red zone and finished 26th in this area, which obviously stalls drives and forces field goals instead of touchdowns. When teams took away the big play from wide receiver Lee Evans, the Bills’ offense did not have the ability to manufacture scoring drives. 

The Bills’ front office and coaching staff talked after the draft about becoming more physical in their offensive line, along with being more physical as an offensive football team. They felt the ‘08 team lacked toughness to finish plays. This claim is supported by the fact that the Bills were one of the worst teams in the NFL in converting third and one, ranking 27th. Converting short yardage is one area that separates good teams from bad ones. 

Schonert has some of the best skill players in the league in running back Marshawn Lynch and wide receivers Evans and Owens. But as we all know, having skill players does not translate into points if the offensive line is not playing well. Getting Trent Edwards to become quicker with his decisions will help the line. Finding an edge blocker at tight end will help both tackles in pass protection and might allow the Bills to have a strongside run game, something that was not always consistent in 2008. 

If I worked for the Bills (or if I were Schonert), I would attempt to pry tight end Daniel Graham away from the Broncos (Side note here: The Broncos drafted a young blocking tight end, Richard Quinn, in the second round, possibly making Graham expendable). Graham’s skills as a blocker would make this offense a significant factor in 2009. He would enhance the running game and allow them time to develop two new tackles (Langston Walker now at left and Kirk Chambers at right). 

The Bills have a lot riding on this season, and it will take the best of every player, coach and front office member to reach the playoffs. My good friend Eric Musselman, the former Golden State Warriors coach, always talked to his team about each player improving 10 percent, each coach improving 10 percent and each executive improving 10 percent. That would make the team 30 percent stronger than the previous year -- and likely resulting in a playoff appearance. 

Schonert has his worked cut out for him. He has to deal with an unpredictable T.O., a new offensive line and looming expectations. He will have to take his coaching game up a notch, as the Bills’ offense must make a giant leap forward.    

Comments

Add a Comment
Dan
May 14, 2009
10:36 AM

I am diehard Colts fan and in my opinion the loss of these two coaches is the greatest loss this organization will feel in the Polian and Irsay era. Dungy was wonderful and added so much to the team in experience and attitude, but these two coaches help build the skeleton of the Colts team. Their departures will be felt for time to come.

Scot
May 14, 2009
10:54 AM

If every player, coach,and executive improved by 10%, then the team would be 10% stronger.

Davenport
May 14, 2009
11:18 AM

Also deserving of mention is Chuck Cecil, a relative unknown (as a coach) taking over for the superb Jim Schwartz on a team that depends on its defense. And, they only have the Steelers, on the road, coming out of the gate.

Brian
May 14, 2009
11:21 AM

Kirk Chambers will not be the Bilsl starting RT, that job belongs to Brad Butler.

SJGMoney
May 14, 2009
12:00 PM

Eric Musselman will never be confused with being a math professor.

And I'm tired about reading about htese older coaches. What they are going to do is retire, get their lump sum pension, and then un-retire and come back to work. They may have to be officially off the job for 30 days or 60 days etc but it won't be for long. The NFL can't blacklist them and not allow them to come back. What are they going to do, tell them to mail back the pension check?

SJGMoney
May 14, 2009
12:03 PM

And the ironic thing about most of these coaches is they would probably be better off leaving the money in the pension fund and then when they actually do retire they can activate it (annuitize it) and live off the income.

From what I've read the NFL is just going to stop allowing the lump sum payout option. I bet a lot of these guys who take the lump sum just end up blowing it. I wonder how much of Alex Gibb's lump sum he has left. If he invested it poorly in the market he probably has considerably less.

Andrew V
May 14, 2009
12:24 PM

I just do hope, that when Moore and Mudd consider coming back, that ESPN gives them the Favre treatment. I want constant updates on their every breath, or else Im going to be really upset. Equal treatment to all, I say.

Robert Boland
May 14, 2009
12:40 PM

Andrew V, Awesome post.

hector12th
May 14, 2009
01:01 PM

Gus Bradley... Seattle Seahawks... Defensive Coordinator... memba it!

Scott M.
May 14, 2009
01:16 PM

I think the assistant with the greatest challenge ahead of him is Dom Capers in GB. Takes over a squad that was an exceptional 4-3 in 2007, flat out collapsed in 2008, and now he's converting it to a 3-4 in 2009 with minimal personnel changes, only two of the original 2008 starters are expected to be replaced. And the failures occured at pretty much every level, not to mention the injury and age issues. The man took one big ole bite of his sandwich - here's hoping he can chew it.

JayR
May 14, 2009
01:45 PM

Mike,

I’m going to disagree. Daniel Graham isn’t going anywhere.

Quinn was drafted initially to be a replacement for Tony Scheffler. And Scheffler, who was very productive in Shannahan’s two tight end passing offense, was often in the dog house under the Shannahan regime for his lack of enthusiasm for any play that didn’t involve him running a pass route. Sheffler also has been in the training room much more than anyone would like and it is clear his days are numbered in this new regime. Daniel Graham is a terrific foot soldier. He does the dirty work without complaint, and you never hear a peep about his lack of catches even though he has excellent hands and can still get open on short and intermediate routes. The Broncos have already jettisoned, the other back up TEs from last year, Nate Jackson and Chad Muster and now have very little depth at the position, which is why they traded up to get Quinn in the first place as they could not go into the season in this new offense with just one very good blocking TE. This offense requires two. See New England for obvious examples that illustrate this point, i.e. Watson and Brady last year.

Mike you have already educated us all on numerous occasions that you do not give up a player unless you have a replacement. In this case, I don’t think that you sacrifice Daniel Graham, a superior blocking TE , who I remind you has a tremendous advantage in that he already previously played for several years in New England successfully performing in the new scheme the Bronco’s will be running. And you surmise that the Broncos will even consider trading him on the hope that a rookie TE is going to come in, learn a brand new system, and then play competently as a starter for the entire season. Mike, I really do not think you thought this one through.

Next year, after Quinn has had a year in the league, they might move Graham and his very healthy salary. But this year there is just no way that it makes sense.

CK
May 14, 2009
02:01 PM

As a Pats fan I do find it a bit grin worthy that Graham has essentially the same role in Den as he had in NE and he sure wanted to leave to be more of a pass catcher when he was in NE.I would love to have him back as a blocker, he was killer. Those wham plays he would crush on still give me a smile. They have Watson who has less skill as a blocker than Graham and they have about the same type of hands, inconsistent. Make the brilliant catch, drop the easy one. They keep trying to find another Graham in Kyle Brady now Baker. I doubt highly Josh McD would let Graham go since he knows Graham's value from his time in NE.

Next 1 - 12 of 23 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)