FROM MICHAEL LOMBARDI:
12 MAY 2009
QUOTE: “Example is not the main thing in influencing others. It is the only thing.” -- Albert Schweitzer (1875 - 1965)
FROM MIKE TRIPLETT OF THE NEW ORLEANS TIMES PICAYUNE... But with the start of organized team activities fast approaching, (Drew) Brees said he's getting fired up. "I love this time of year," Brees said before teeing off at coach Sean Payton's charity golf tournament at TPC Louisiana on Monday. "You like to see the team come together, and you just like to see the dynamics kind of develop. And certainly with (new coordinator) Gregg Williams now on the defensive side of the ball, you know the defense is going to have a lot of new wrinkles, a lot to install. … We always have ways to get better. We've been No. 1 in offense two of the last three years. But when you do that, people start gunning for you. Everybody watches your film. Everybody evaluates you. So you know they're going to scheme for you. So you have to continue to stay ahead of the curve. You have to be able to go out there and execute against anything, any defensive look, any game plan, whatever it might be. And I feel like going up against a Gregg Williams defense every day in practice is going to help us get that way.”
I’m very excited that my colleague, Matt Bowen, accepted my challenge Monday. This little side bet will make the season even more interesting on a week-to-week basis. I have never been to a WWE event and don’t plan to break my streak. It will be fun to see the Boss in Europe next spring. Thanks, Mr. Bowen.
The best thing about being in the NFL is winning on the road. The “sound of silence” is the greatest when you’re walking off the field. When I was in the league, the most effective way to evaluate your team was watching its performance on the road. Dealing with adversity and overcoming crowd noise and a hostile environment build team unity and require each player’s performance to be at the highest level. I hear coaches say they love going away to training camp to build team unity. My reaction to that statement is that being at camp has nothing to do with building team unity -- coming back to win a game in the fourth quarter builds team unity. Winning on the road builds team unity, not being in some small dorm room in the middle of nowhere.

How NFL teams perform on the road, along with their road records, are vital to my overall evaluation. The Texans, for example, have won six road games in the past three years, and that’s why I feel they don’t have the physical or mental toughness to take it to the next level. On Monday, I mentioned that the Saints and Texans are similar teams to me because they’re both so good on offense but have trouble being effective on defense.
The Saints are fun to watch on offense. They’re extremely creative with their schemes and play calling, and having Drew Brees run the offense is like having another coach on the field. When I watch the Saints, I often think of Brees as an extension of head coach Sean Payton on the field. If God had given Sean just a little more talent (remember, he played for the Bears during the strike season), he would’ve been just like Drew. They’re a perfect combination, and it seems like when Brees is in the huddle, Payton is in there, too.
It’s been well-documented here at the Post that I believe the Saints need a big back to give them a physical dimension. I’m not a believer that Pierre Thomas can handle that role. He has some skills as a runner and fits their offensive style well, but he’s not a pounder. I felt (and wrote) that if they’d had a big back last year (based on the preseason, I felt Deuce McAllister was not the same player he once was) they might have been able to keep the lead, not allowing their very suspect defense back on the field. The Saints ranked 29th in the NFL in converting third-and-one situations, and those plays are critical when trying to hold a lead late in the game. The Saints admitted they were interested in drafting a big back this year, but the limited number of picks prevented them from filling that need. As a result, they’re looking into Edge James and any other free-agent back who can fill this need.
Other than acquiring a big running back, the Saints can function very well on offense. Getting a big back would help their defense as much as their offense because their defense last year was the weak link. I mentioned in the Sunday Post how strongly former 49ers coach Bill Walsh believed that having a defense that complemented a high-scoring offense was vital to winning championships. The Saints must find that right complement. On paper, they seem to have the right idea, but defensive end Will Smith and Charles Grant have not been able to supply the pass rush that would enable the Saints to create turnovers and build leads. To try to supplement their lack of rush, the Saints were forced to blitz too often, thus resulting in the worse defense in the NFL in defending the passing game when blitzing.
The Saints’ secondary last year dropped too many passes that could have been interceptions and helped close out games, and their ball-hawking skills were nonexistent. Adding Malcolm Jenkins should help a secondary that gave up too many big plays of over 20 yards, finishing 26th in the NFL.
Hiring Gregg Williams will help solve some of their problems on defense. He will improve their fundamentals, keeping their overall defensive scheme reduced and eliminating all the mental mistakes that come with having too much scheme. They will be benefit from adding players like defensive lineman Rod Coleman and Paul Spicer to their defensive line rotation, assuming both players can stay healthy and fill the roles on the sub defense.

The Saints’ offense is so effective, so well coached, that vertical field position (this is where teams start drives) never seems to prevent them from moving the ball down the field. However, they must improve the talent level at the bottom of their roster; they have to find players who can dominate covering kicks. The Saints played on too many short fields last season because they were horrible covering kicks, and this resulted in finishing 15th in points allowed. They must improve their kicking cover teams.
Finally, they have to win on the road. Last year, their two road wins came at Kansas City and Detroit. They must find a way to improve their overall toughness and not always have to win on the arm of Brees. It’s so easy to rely on throwing the ball to make plays that it hinders the ability of the team to gain a physical sense. What Brees said about practicing against a Gregg Williams defense each day will help their physical nature.
For me right now, the Saints are a wild card in terms of making the playoffs. They must make a few more personnel moves before camp starts in July before I can hop on the Bandwagon as my colleague, Mr. Bowen, has already done. I don’t understand how a person from Iowa, who played safety in the NFL, can become so soft in his love of teams. It’s a mystery.
The Saints should try to trade for P. Hillis of the Broncos. Broncos backfield is loaded now, and Hillis showed last season that he can convert 3rd down plays and is a very able receiver out of the backfield for Brees. Plus he is young and should not be too pricey to get.
Great article on the Saints, Mike!
Like you said, the biggest question on this team continues to be Will Smith and Charles Grant. If they could come close to playing up to their contracts, then this team would be in the playoffs. It is tough for a team to compete when they pay two defensive ends such big money, and they get basically nothing from them like they did last year.
And they should sign Edge James if his price isn't too high. He showed in the playoffs last year that he is still a competent back, and that's all that they need.
Jabari Greer will also play a huge role in helping the Saints DBs. He is a burner at cornerback and has great ball skills.
Also, go get Michael Bush & another Defensive Tackle to go alongside Sedrick Ellis.
Yeah, if something works, don't fix it. Sure, if the Saints slowed down the offense, the defense woudl rest and have fewer trips on the field. But the Saints are the best in the league at scoring points. Slowing that down will turn a great offense into a good one, and the payback of the improvement on defense would not compensate for it. Don't change the offense. Improve the defense.
The Saints were tied for 2nd in the league in first downs, and averaged 7.1 plays per TD drive (and 9.1 plays per made FG drive). They were 15th in TOP (30:22 per game). For reference, ATL (a team many would say controls the clock with a good running attack and short pass game) was 13th at 30:49 (27 seconds more per game than New Orleans). I'd hardly call the Saints a stat-padding, score-too-quickly offense.
The primary issue was poor play and a ton of injuries on the defensive side of the ball. With the additions of Jenkins, Greer, and Sharper in the secondary, two healthy starting DEs (Grant and W Smith), and the possibility of Dan Morgan contributing to the LB corps, plus the presence of Gregg Williams as DC, the defense has the potential to improve. Considering the Saints lost six games by a total of 18 points last year, any improvement in the defense should put this team in contention for a playoff spot.
Nice write up. I like the insight about kick coverage, as that is easy to overlook when evaluating defensive effectiveness. Also the comment regarding toughness seems right on point, too. I do have one question though, and perhaps MattB can clarify, but I thought Greg WIlliams defenses were noted for their complexity (at least they used to be). I'm sure he's not rolling out his vintage 46 hyper agressive D's. but his style still requires more thinking/reacting than other, more Cover2-heavy schemes, yes?
JC in FL, you present interesting data but that's not proving your point. Being 15th in TOP means a) your team keeps the ball a good bit via first downs, and b) your defense can't get teams off the field. Your comparison with Atlanta doesn't account for THEIR bad defense that couldn't stop drives, thus inflating opponents' TOP (much like NO's def can't get stops, either).
I do agree that injuries played a big role in the D's poor play; Gregg Williams' schemes will also help. I still think Lombardi's point that they're not a tough team stands.
Good stuff Mike, but here are some counter stats/facts to your Pierre Thomas argument:
43 of his 129 carries went for first downs, a 33.3 percent rate that easily led the NFL. He scored on six of his eight goal-line carries last season, giving him a 75 percent conversion rate that was the second best in football. Also, Thomas was “stuffed” on just six of his 129 rushes, giving him by far the best stuffs/carry rate in the league.
Greg - I wasn't trying to "prove" anything, nor do I have any real issue with what Michael wrote. Simply was disagreeing with the first comment (where the writer admitted that he had only watched a couple of their games) that characterized the Saints offense as a vertical-passing, stat-padding, score quickly team that "goes for broke" in the first quarter. That description couldn't be further from the truth.
Michael, please talk about Sedrick Ellis in year 2. I think they need a large step forward from him to have a chance of having an average or better defense. He's a guy I'll be following in 09
Yeah - The Saints do very little vertical passing. Most of the passes are 7 yards or so, more like an extended running play. One thing about Brees though is he makes great reads on the fly, so when that one receiver comes open deep, he wont hesitate to air it out. I saw a comparison the other day between the Saints' offense now and the rams' offense back when Warner was QB. I have seen many times these offenses be compared because the amount of passing yards, but they are achieved in different ways. The Rams gained those yards with long passes, while the Saints gain those yards with mostly short, possesion style passes. So I have to say as one who watches every Saints game that you are mistaken in your statement.
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Fox’s future in Carolina is tied...
Both have problems, but playoff...
Raiders QB lacks motivation and...
The best defense is sometimes...
Bills new coach must embrace the...
May 12, 2009
11:58 AM
Not a big Saints follower. I watch a couple of their games a year - not many... but from an outsider's perspective, I like the idea of them "getting back to basics".
Run effectively... and STOP the run... and you win games.
Drew Brees reminds me of Steve PreFontaine in that he runs on all cylinders from start to finish. But...slow and steady wins the race. Slow down some, use plays to keep the clock moving, and then capitalize vertically when given the opportunity. There's no need to go for broke in the first quarter offensively. You need to run some plays to wear down the defense.
As it is - Brees is throwing TDs in the first few plays of drives. Nothing is accomplished except scoring and stat-padding - and yeah, scoring is the obvious GOAL - but you also want the opponents to wear down and get tired. There's more to football than "just scoring"...
Okay... now I sound like the guy who said Cris Carter only caught touchdown passes.... but hopefully I'm getting my point across. Football is "multi-faceted", which is why we're so obsessed with it. You want to do things that accomplish more than ONE thing when you do it.
Passing vertically gives you fat stats and a score, and that's all.
Running the ball and completing short passes accomplishes MORE than one thing. It gets you first downs, it wears down opponent defenses, it gives YOUR defense a rest, it gives every player more experience, it runs the clock, it keeps opponent offense from being on the field and if they are not on the field, they can't score.....and eventually, YOU'LL get a score...but look at all you've accomplished in the MEANTIME even if you DON'T score.
Be able to run (the clock) and stop the run (because YOU want to control the clock). Patience.