RSS

Diner News: Around The NFL

Michael Lombardi

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This January 06, 2009, 10:32 AM EST
23 Comments

From Michael Lombardi:

6 January 2009

QUOTE:  “Gentlemen, we are going to relentlessly chase perfection, knowing full well we will not catch it, because nothing is perfect. But we are going to relentlessly chase it, because in the process we will catch excellence. I am not remotely interested in just being good. “ ~ Vince Lombardi, first team meeting as Packers coach (1959), as reported in Chuck Carlson’s “Game of My Life”

FROM BOB MCGINN OF THE MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL... McCarthy notified defensive coordinator Bob Sanders by telephone Sunday after they talked at length last week. Then he met with the six members of the defensive staff on Monday morning and released four of them. At some point, McCarthy also found time to can Rock Gullickson, the strength coach. "He beat that record in one day," said Chuck Lane, the Packers' publicist from 1966-'80 who was reminiscing Monday about the day that Bart Starr fired him and others almost 30 years ago. "This sets some sort of new record."

Based on the number of emails in my in-box, there appears to be tremendous interest in the Packers.  Heading into this season, the Packers had the look of a very talented defense. They had some young defensive linemen and some very talented coverage men, and they also had an offense that could complement their defense.  They were coming off a tough loss to the Giants, but as I have written numerous times, they needed to expand their package and have the versatility to play some zone when the match-ups in man-to-man did not favor their personnel.  However, they made mistakes last off-season and none of them had to do with Brett Favre.  They refused to pay Corey Williams, who played so well in ‘07 that the Packers designated him their franchise player and then traded him for a second-round pick.  They selected quarterback Brian Brohm with the pick and counted on Justin Harrell to step into Williams’ role. 

Now, you must understand that to run the Packers’ defensive scheme, you have to dominate in the defensive line.  This scheme is not based on creativity but rather on forcing the quarterback to feel pressure in every aspect of his play -- forcing him to make tight throws into tight windows and be very accurate.  It requires the team to have a middle linebacker who can play pass first, and it wants to utilize seven-man fronts and hold up against the run.  To defeat this scheme, the opponent must be talented in the offensive line and at wide receiver. 

So with that as a backdrop, the Packers lost one of their best defensive linemen in Cullen Jenkins, and after trading Williams, they could not get any production from Harrell, making their once-dominating defensive line very blockable.  Then they lost their starting Mike backer, Nick Barnett; their best coverage man, Al Harris, for an extended period; and their strong safety, Atari Bigby. The result: They could not compensate for all the injuries. 

Injuries are never an excuse for a team, but in the case of the Packers, I really do not feel Bob Sanders would be in the unemployment line had these not occurred.  This is the same man who was part of a 13-win season in ’07. The factors that cost them their jobs had more to do with injuries than Sanders’ lack of talent as a coach. 

Where do the Packers go from here?  Well, they have drafted and procured talent to fit this scheme.  In addition, most of the players in their defensive backfield are only suited for this kind of defense.  If they change the scheme, they will have to change some of the players, and this may result in some tough transitional times.  They can stay with the scheme and enhance it with new ideas built around their base defense -- expand and add more defensive lineman to help get their defense back to the ‘07 level.  If I were with the Packers, I would make sure we placed a higher importance on getting more defensive lineman and would never let a young one walk out of the building when it looked like he might be a great player in the league.  No matter what direction the Packers choose, they must get some defensive linemen who can dominate. 

My guess is that Winston Moss will be the new coordinator. He can help in the transitional phase since he is remaining on the staff, and I doubt very strongly he is going to want to work with a new coach and new scheme.  Keeping Moss tells me the Packers may interview others, but they will end up hiring him.  Why keep Moss if you are bringing in another coach?  Mike Nolan would help enhance the scheme, but his idea of how to play defense and the Moss’ idea are slightly different.  Not that either is wrong; it’s just that both are different in their approaches.  Moss is a very good young coach who is interviewing for head coaching jobs and feels his time is now. 

FROM NICHOLAS J. COSONIKA OF THE DETROIT FREE PRESS... The Lions have interviewed Giants defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo and Titans defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz, whose teams had first-round byes, and Redskins secondary coach Jerry Gray, whose team missed the playoffs. It is unclear whether Cowboys offensive coordinator Jason Garrett is a candidate. He reportedly has removed his name from consideration, but some say that is untrue. Another name popped up Monday: Stanford coach Jim Harbaugh, who played quarterback at Michigan and spent time with the Lions before the 2001 season. Nationalfootballpost.com listed the Lions as one of three teams interested in him.

I mentioned on NFL Network and here at The Post yesterday that the Jets would try to talk to Stanford coach Jim Harbaugh, who I feel is one of the best young coaches in America.  The Rams and the Lions are also going to speak with him. 

I was fortunate to work with Harbaugh at the Hotel, and I hired his brother John in Philadelphia, his first NFL job.  At the Hotel, we were looking for a former player who could come in, work with the quarterbacks and learn how to coach.  John called me about his brother, and I have been a fan ever since.  He will win; he will succeed in anything he does.  He is rare in that he is a former player with head coaching experience. 

He is the most competitive person I have ever been associated with, and he combines his competitive nature with a high degree of intelligence.  An example of this competitive nature was never more evident than when we both attended a father-son basketball tournament while our boys were in the eighth grade.  The event, called “Runts and Grunts,” included two-on-two games featuring fathers and sons.  The fathers could not score, and the first team to seven won.

Well, Jim’s son was a good player but was suffering from the flu, and the best player in the eighth grade had a father who played Division I ball in college.  Without going into details, Jim played this game as if it was the Super Bowl.  He had drive and passion, and his only thought was winning -- which he did.  That experience made me a believer. 

Jim has a thirst for knowledge. He is always trying to improve, and he is always thinking of his team.  He has the drive and the determination to be a success, and the fact he is a coach who was a former player will give him an instant credibility in the locker room. 

During the twilight of Bill Walsh’s life, I used to visit and have lunch with my hero, and we would talk about Jim.  Bill loved Jim and loved the potential he saw in him. It was as if Bill saw a younger version of himself. He wanted to open up his head and pour all his knowledge into Jim.   We both knew that Jim would one day win in the Pac-10, win a Super Bowl and be a legendary coach.  I know he loves Stanford and is in the process of finalizing an extension there.  But one day, he will be in the NFL and will be a great hire. 

FROM MIKE CHAPPEL OF THE INDY STAR... Marvin Harrison's place in NFL history is set, but he could be history with the Colts. In an unforgiving business, he might not be considered worth the investment. Harrison, 36, is due a $9 million base salary in 2009 and will count $13.4 million against a league salary cap that's expected to be in the $123 million range.  Management faces some difficult decisions regarding its veteran free agents. The list includes three-time Pro Bowl center Jeff Saturday, starting cornerback Kelvin Hayden and backup running back Dominic Rhodes.

I watched Marvin Harrison all season and really have great respect for his game, but I am confident, based on the tape I have seen, that he will not be back in Indy next year.  He cannot make the plays he needs to make, but his cap number creates a problem for the Colts.  I am sure that as classy as the Colts are, they will handle this decision with care and try to make it as painless as possible.  However, the market for Harrison will not be strong and he will have to face the reality that the end of a magnificent career is near. 

FROM MIKE KLIS OF THE DENVER POST... In the past three seasons, Montrae Holland has played for three of the NFL's most ingenious offensive coaches — Sean Payton, Mike Shanahan and Jason Garrett.  Payton and Shanahan were head coaches. Garrett will try to become one today when he interviews for the Broncos' head coaching job at Dove Valley. "He was like a head coach without being the head coach," Holland said of Garrett, the Dallas Cowboys' offensive coordinator. "I think he has the swagger of a head coach.  He'd be a big get for you, if they pull the trigger." Holland is an offensive guard who played for Payton's New Orleans Saints in 2006, when Payton was named the NFL's coach of the year. Signed by the Broncos after that season, Holland started all 16 games for Shanahan in 2007, but he got beat out in 2008 after reporting to training camp overweight.

It is very interesting to see the Broncos go in an offensive direction.  I really feel the team needs to improve its overall toughness and needs to find a way to improve the defense.  As I mentioned yesterday, Jeremy Bates and Rick Dennison of the Broncos’ staff are very good coaches and have accomplished much more in the NFL than Mr. Garrett.  Garrett is struggling to handle the Cowboys’ situation; what makes anyone feel he can handle an entire team?  Even in coaches, past performance predicts future achievement.  If Garrrett is on the list, then why not talk to Harbaugh?  He has been a head coach, he has coached an entire team and he has played in the NFL.  He has all the qualities that Garrett is selling, but with more experience. 

My oldest son had the best line the other day when I was complaining about how some of these teams are interviewing coaches with lawyers and accountants, and not football men.  I kept asking him, “How would they even know what to ask a coach?”  His reply: “Dad, they are not interviewing coaches, they are interviewing people.”  That Fordham Jesuit education is well worth it. Enough said....

AROUND THE NFL SEGMENT ON NFL NETWORK...

MATT CASSEL SEGMENT ON NFL NETWORK...

Comments

Add a Comment
Scott M.
Jan 06, 2009
02:07 PM

Peter - I think you're getting mixed up on Poppinga. I honestly can't recall ever seeing him on a blitz this season and he was normally not on the field for passing downs until late in the year. Not sure if you realize it but shortly after mid-season, they started using Poppinga at DE to spell Kampmann, who was getting worn out due to our defense not getting off the field. This was part of Sanders efforts to make the scheme work instead of adjusting the scheme but the plays you're describing were ones that I recall watching when he was lined up at DE, not LB. And to a degree, that is exactly how he should've been playing on those downs.

On Williams, yes his production is typical for a DE in a 3-4 scheme. Would love to see one of the Williams Fan Club Members provide us with the list of how many other 3-4 DEs that don't produce sacks averaging $6.33mil per year. Pretty short list...

Ryan
Jan 06, 2009
02:24 PM

Think you're overestimating Corey Williams. It's easy to see that he was the only difference from 2007 beside injuries and mistake it. But unless you have evidence from film back then why he "might be a great player", we had a ton of pretty good linemen and he didn't distinguish himself much from the pack, his ending contract did.

Peter
Jan 06, 2009
02:34 PM

Scott - no I don't get mixed up on Poppinga. He usually played on 1st and 2nd down, and then on 3rd when it was obvious passing down they took him out and brought in Williams or Blackmon. Later in the season, he moved to DE on 3rd downs, where he didn't do anything. He remained on the field on 1st and 2nd downs, however. To give you just one example, he was blitzing at least twice against the Texans, and it was a run twice instead of a pass, and Slaton ran right by him when Poppinga tried to get to Schaub. For having played DE in College, he really is not a good blitzer, but they had to go to him since Barnett was out. In other cases, they used Chillar and Hawk once Barnett was out, and they got home at least some of the time. Poppinga is a high effort guy, but his production is unfortunately not matching his effort. I am very high on Bishop, and don't understand how they never tried to bring him into the lineup, when there was no production from Poppinga all year long. Even if that meant moving otehr LBs around.

Peter
Jan 06, 2009
02:42 PM

Ryan - yes maybe I am overestimating Corey. At the same time, you certainly cannot argue the fact that ther was no inside pass rush this season whatsoever, so apparently of all the DTs, Corey Williams was the best in that category. Run defense was worse this year than last year too. So if he made no difference, same scheme, same coaches, same players with a few exceptions: KGB, Corey, and injuries to Barnett and Jenkins. But remember, even in 2007 KGB was mostly a 3rd down DE, and Jenkins was not overly productive with 44 tackles and 1 sack - I guess Corey and Barnett's impact must have been very high then. Fact remains, whether they had to overpay Corey or not, they could not adequately replace him. And they have nobody on the roster who could provide inside pass rush, should Jenkins remain at DE. So now they have to look for someone there, and they ahve a hole tat they is bigger than before trading Corey.

Michael C. from Greenville
Jan 06, 2009
05:43 PM

I think the big problem with letting Corey Williams go was that Justin Harrell was not very good. If Harrell plays decent football this year then the Williams trade is very reasonable.

The Packers drafted Jordy Nelson and Brian Brohm in the second round I am not sure those guys are starters in the NFL, which make the loss of Williams hard to swallow.

The Packers live and die with their drafts and probably should have sought a veteran D-lineman in free agency in case Harrell turned out to be a bust...

I still think you can be a player in Free Agency without screwing up your cap but Ted Thompson for what ever reason only uses one resource for acquiring talent.

Dan I
Jan 06, 2009
06:17 PM

What Michael fails to consider and what a couple have already commented on is GOOD coaches find adjustments to their SCHEME to compensate for injuries.

Bob Sanders was INEPT adjusting. In GAME adjustments were even WORSE. There are MANY ways to get PRESSURE on QB's with sub par personnel. Look no further than the Miami Dolphins.

Excellent coaches game plan TO their STRENGTHS and minimize their weakness. Sanders didn't do that at ALL this year. We were a better defense in 07 simply due to the fact we avoided the injury bug. ANYONE can coach in THOSE circumstances. Thus the change was NEEDED.

Ryan B.
Jan 06, 2009
09:05 PM

Here's some pretty big news, IMO anyway: the Green Bay Press Gazette just posted on PackersNews.com that two sources told them Mike Nolan is already assembling his staff and is 90-100 percent likely to be the new DC. Of course, don't know if this is liable, but for the GBPG to put it in print already makes me think it's going to pan out. Guess we'll see.

Scott M.
Jan 06, 2009
10:47 PM

Dan - Michael does in fact specifically mention that Sanders needed to expand on his scheme after the loss to the Giants the prior year, he mentions incorporating zone coverages to compensate for personnel match-ups which is pretty much what you're saying, just in a different way. To compensate for injuries, you need to be able to adjust for when your opponents personnel are better than your own.

Jero D
Jan 07, 2009
09:15 AM

Nolan hired McCarthy to be an OC in SF and could become the DC under McCarthy in GB. I am sure this scenario has played out in the past, but is this something Nolan would settle with?

Jero D
Jan 07, 2009
09:16 AM

If Nolan becomes the DC, that leaves Moss at the LB position, or set on moving to another team?

Peter
Jan 07, 2009
09:50 AM

I don't think Nolan is interviewing for any HC openings this year, so if he wants to say in the NFL, he'd certainly want to consider a DC position. I have 3 concerns with nolan, though. First, he mostly ran a 3-4, and I don't think as stated before that the Packers have the players for a 3-4. Secondly, I remember that the 49ers changed the scheme since it was too complex, once Singletary came in he simplified it with much better results. And third, well the combination Nolan - McCarthy did not exactly work well in SF, when nolan was HC and McCarthy was OC. Whether it would work better for the Packers wich McCarthy being HC and Nolan DC remains to be seen. He is a proven DC with good results, though, and I am hopeful he can establish a more aggressive system than Sanders had, should he really be hired.

Next 13 - 23 of 23 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)