RSS

Diner News: Around The NFL

Michael Lombardi

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This January 13, 2009, 10:06 AM EST
29 Comments

FROM MICHAEL LOMBARDI:

13 January 2009

QUOTE:  “In such a fantastic and dangerous world — we will not find answers in old dogmas, by repeating outworn slogans, or fighting on ancient battlegrounds against fading enemies long after the real struggle has moved on. We ourselves must change to master change. We must rethink all our told ideas and beliefs before they capture and destroy us. And for those answers American must look to its young people, the children of this time of change. And we look especially to that privileged minority of educated men who are students of America.” ~ Robert F. Kennedy    

FROM LINDSAY H. JONES OF THE DENVER POST... Mike Nolan, the former San Francisco 49ers coach who was a member of Dan Reeves' defensive staff here from 1987-92, has agreed to become the team's defensive coordinator. "Mike is a very good coach, he's a good communicator and he's been around this league for a long time, and he's been a head coach in this league," McDaniels said. "All those things are very valuable, and his experience on the defensive side is absolutely a value to any organization."  Nolan, 49, followed Reeves to the New York Giants in 1993 for his first coordinator job. Their first year in New York, the Giants' defense allowed a league-low 205 points.

Josh McDaniels  might be young, but he is not limited in his experience to handle the head coaching job in Denver.  Where he may face some difficulty is trying to blend his idea of football operations and procuring talent, which he learned in New England, to the current style and manner in Denver.  The Broncos have done things one way for the past 14 years, and McDaniels has learned his way for the past eight years.  I can say without a single doubt, the two are dramatically different.  From his time with the Patriots, McDaniels received an education in procurement and knows how to build a very structured and detailed personnel department.  The Broncos have functioned under a completely different style and have never been very detailed and structured when it comes to personnel.  They relied more on the position coaches to make highlight tapes and then meet for two weeks and have the coaches and scouts grade the players.  Their scouts did the background work, but the bulk of the decision-making was based on the presentation of the tapes. 

With current personnel director Jim Goodman having the final say in deciding whom they select, he will obviously have the final say on how the department is set up.  McDaniels will need to take time to evaluate the situation and will need to make sure he knows what he’s getting into in terms of personnel.  He comes in with an open mind and a clean slate, and it will be very important for the members of the Denver front office to prove their knowledge and work ethic to their new head coach.  Goodman may have the final say, but McDaniels has the knowledge of what he wants in each player, and Goodman will have to learn how McDaniels views the game and work accordingly.  Goodman may have been a former coach, but this will be new to him as he has only been in one organization in his career.  Therefore, he must make the adjustments; it will be important to minimize the transition time. 

McDaniels started out working in personnel, where each coach and most of the decision makers in New England are well versed in understanding “players and plays” and how they blend.  That will not be the case in the Denver personnel department, which only sees players.  McDaniels will need to learn how to deal with this difference, and he will need to make sure he can install his way of procurement . That, to me, will be his greatest challenge. 

FROM BOB KRAVITZ OF THE INDY STAR... Dungy taught people. He touched people. He moved people. He was more than a football coach, which is why he is leaving us now, to return home, to teach and touch and move others. "I'll never forget (Colts owner) Jim (Irsay) calling me and saying what he wanted to do and he said something that was very important to me. He said, here in Indianapolis, we don't have the tradition, we don't have three and four generations of Colts fans and we have to connect with our community and we have to turn our young people into Colts fans, and that's what I want to do by winning, by winning the right way,' Dungy said. "That was very enticing to me.”

There is no doubt that Tony was more than a coach.  He changed the perception of what a coach should be from all the past stereotypes.  A yeller, a screamer, a maniac -- Tony was none of those.  A coach is primarily a teacher.  How each coach/teacher delivers his message is unique, and Dungy had his own Christian-based style.  He took what I call the Bobby Kennedy approach to his career -- he guided his life with principles, not ambition. Lee Igel, a good friend and soon to be contributor here at the Post who is also professor at NY U, emailed me last night when he heard the news about Dungy and said he thought that some of Tony’s beliefs are Peter Drucker-based.  Moving from Success to Significance is the core of the message that Tony believes and essentially is what Drucker believed.

Tony will be missed, but he has a different vision for his life right now.  He will make significant impact on youth in America.  He would be a great addition to newly elected President Barack Obama’s inner circle as he could provide an actual voice and understanding of youth in America.  His practical experience dealing with young men will offer a fresh perspective on what we can do to make this country better and how we can help grow as a nation.  Tony has much to offer, and I have a feeling his life out of football will be more rewarding and satisfying. 

FROM JIM WYATT OF THE TENNESSEAN... As the Titans packed up Monday to go their separate ways in the wake of Saturday's playoff loss to the Ravens, Collins reiterated his feelings from a few months back. Yet after a season in which he guided the Titans to the NFL's best record and the AFC's top seed, his words carry more weight. He wants to return to Tennessee as the starter. "I made my case known, that I'd like to be here and feel that I can be a part of several more good seasons. I have several good years left in me, I know that," Collins said. "I will pack up and go somewhere else. I don't want to, but that's the reality of this business. … I am a starter in this league and if nothing materializes that way I will retire.'  Just two days into the offseason, Fisher wasn't prepared to declare his plans at quarterback, but he said the Titans would like to re-sign Collins, who's at the end of his two-year contract. The Titans prefer a salary cap-friendly, two-year deal in the range of $4 million plus incentives, and there are indications they envision him remaining the starter.

My hunch is that the Titans will now become Kerry Collins team in writing.  The new contract will reflect a commitment that will eliminate any doubt who will be the starter next training camp.  The Titans are going to have to move away from Vince Young.  If they could possibly trade him, now would be the right time.  I doubt there are any suitors out there for Vince right now, not because of his talent, but more to do with his laissez-faire attitude and his unwillingness to be a team member.  Who would want the burden of trying to make him a player and deal with his attitude?  A large part of being a starting quarterback in the NFL has to do with command and leadership.  If Young wants to be a player, he needs to gain his teammates’ respect, and changing venues is not going to make this better.  No matter where he might go, he must understand that he has to become a good teammate first and be involved.  He might want to follow Dungy’s lead and move from success to significance.  Did you see him on the sidelines Saturday night?  Young looked as if he was bored and didn’t want to be there.  He has to stop being so selfish and learn how to handle the tough times before he can restart his career.  He might want to buy a Peter Drucker book and work on self-improvement. 

FROM ERIK BOLAND OF NEWSDAY... Various "favorites" - from Giants defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo to Jets offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer to Ravens defensive coordinator Rex Ryan - have been reported in the last 10 days, reflective of Tannenbaum's leanings on a given day.  Tannenbaum's choice is likely to come from those three, with Ryan, interviewed during a five-hour session in Baltimore on Sunday, the latest to impress. Ryan's interview was described by an organizational source as having gone "very well." The Jets are very high on Ryan and vice versa.  Cardinals assistant head coach Russ Grimm has a slimmer chance. The others interviewed -- Jets assistant head coach Bill Callahan, former Boston College coach Jeff Jagodzinski, Stanford coach Jim Harbaugh and Colts defensive coordinator Ron Meeks -- are considered longshots at best.  Tannenbaum, the league source said, is strongly considering giving the nod to Schottenheimer but is mindful of what the reaction of the media and, most important, the fans would be.  "Mike has been more sensitive to the media and fan reaction than he has been," the source said.

Last year, poor Jim Fassel was all set to become the Redskins’ head coach, but the front office of the ‘Skins decided to test fan and media reaction before finalizing the deal.  When the public sentiment was not favorable, the ‘Skins backed off and went in another direction.  It appears the Jets are very concerned about what the media and fans are thinking.  They want a friendly press conference and they do not want to have to sell their head coach to the media and fans.  This attitude makes it clear to me that they are not sure what they really want.  There has to be a conviction of beliefs, much like Patriots owner Robert Kraft had when he hired Bill Belichick.  Kraft knew Belichick was a great coach, and in spite of what the media thought, he stuck with his convictions and made the hire. 

Since the Jets knew for the last month of the season they might fire Eric Mangini, it would have been critical for the general manager to have a list of things he felt he needed in a coach and what direction he wanted to take the organization.  The best way to learn about a player or coach is to not let anyone know you are interested.  When I was in Cleveland, we would send someone down to the Playboy All-American weekend in Phoenix to hang around and observe the college players without letting them know we were with the Browns.  We could see them in their natural environment and behaving normally.  That concept is the same when you are looking for a head coach.  You must do research before it becomes public.  Preparation and knowing what you want are the most important criteria. 

If they believe Schottenheimer is the right man, then go with that decision. But I feel the Jets do not have conviction about anything or anyone and do not know what they want -- besides a nice, friendly press conference. 

FROM TOM SILVERSTEIN OF THE MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL... The most often mentioned candidate is Philadelphia secondary coach Sean McDermott, who has trained for 10 seasons under respected defensive coordinator Jim Johnson.  ESPN.com reported that McDermott has one year left on his contract, which means Eagles coach Andy Reid could exercise his right to deny permission for other clubs to speak to McDermott once the Eagles' season is over. Another name to keep an eye on is St. Louis Rams interim coach Jim Haslett. He and McCarthy coached together in New Orleans. Others whom McCarthy might pursue are secondary coaches Jerry Gray of Washington, Tim Lewis of Carolina and Dom Capers of New England as well as San Diego defensive coordinator Ron Rivera. Yet another name to remember is Titans assistant head coach/linebackers Dave McGinnis, who McCarthy wanted to interview when he hired Bob Sanders in 2006.

I know things change in the NFL, but it would seem strange to me to see Jim Haslett and Mike McCarthy reunited after Haslett was the one who fired Mike in New Orleans.  I know time can heal old wounds, but I am not sure that this will happen, as the divorce in New Orleans was not amicable. 

AROUND THE NFL SEGMENT ON NFL NETWORK...

Comments

Add a Comment
Albert
Jan 13, 2009
01:08 PM

DJ and Andrew: certainly Ted Thompson deserves some criticism for the Packers' failings in free agency, but there are reasons why players don't necessarily want to play in Green Bay that are out of his control. First of all, the Green Bay area has a bad reputation among the league's black players as a place that's not very friendly to them. Players talk to each other, and this stuff matters, particularly in a league where black players make up such a huge portion of the available talent. That's compounded by the fact that, thanks to Wisconsin's brutal winters, Green Bay's a place where it's awfully unpleasant to live for roughly half the entire year. It's not all about the money: give a young single guy a choice between being rich and single in a brutally cold small-market city disproportionately full of overweight Scandinavians on the one hand, and being rich and single in, say, Miami or DC or Dallas or San Diego on the other, and he's not going to Green Bay. Cold, old, overwhelmingly-white towns like Green Bay, Pittsburgh, and Buffalo are at a disadvantage in free agency, which is why those three cities in particular have always fielded better teams when they focus on building through the draft, where players don't get much of a choice about where they play. It's something to think about when criticizing Ted Thompson.

Scott M.
Jan 13, 2009
01:42 PM

Peter - being concerned about Nolan going to Denver borders on ridiculous. You're seeing parallels where none currently exist. First off, the market isn't exactly overflowing with quality DCs that are looking to be DCs - most of the good DC candidates are trying to land HC jobs. Williams' primary interest is not to be a DC, he wants to be a HC, he's never made a secret of this. Bottom line is whether or not an organization has the pieces a DC needs to succeed and regardless of their performance this year, GB has some pretty good pieces in place.

Nikos
Jan 13, 2009
01:56 PM

Great work Michael, this is a definite must read daily for any football fan. Now that McDaniels is gone, who do you see BB replacing him with? How about former Patriot assistant and current Carolina OC Jeff Davidson http://www.panthers.com/Team/CoachBio.aspx?id=16544?

His contract is running out as you wrote recently. Is he a possibility in New England?

Thanks

Peter
Jan 13, 2009
02:52 PM

Scott M. - Williams may want to be a HC, but at the moment, he is interviewing exclusively for DC positions. He won't chose the Packers, but I don't think that has to do with his perceived desire to be a HC. Nolan was a prime candidate as a well respected DC, had no options to becoming a HC at this time, by all accounts has a great relationship both professionally and privately with Mike McCarthy, and would've had free reigns on the defensive side of the ball. Yet he still chose Denver, working with a new 32-year old HC who he has never worked with and doesn't know. During the last week, all reports and NFL sources pointed to Nolan coming to GB. Of course that may have been media fabrications. But, McCarthy so far has only interviewed 2 people. One has gone somewhere else and the other one will go somewhere else also. So unless the Packers are really targeting someone who is on the staff of the remaining 4 teams, anybody else would be 2nd choice as a candidate, and it does concern me that the first 2 choices are chosing to go somewhere else. Couple that with the fact that players have openly stated they'd rather play somewhere else (including Charles Woodson, who only came since no other team even made an offer), it is clear that GB is not a place to play for in the NFL. If it doesn't concern you, good for you.

Albert - you are right, but at the same time, someone who is really serious about football should love to play here. If somebody is into clubbing or meeting supermodels or whatever, then by all means, Miami, San Diego, that's the place to go.

Mary Simon
Jan 13, 2009
03:48 PM

If Ted Thompson can throw Brett Favre out like garbage, who would go to Green Bay and expect better treatment than Brett got from Thompson? All the Packers had to do was release Brett, but NO, Thompson had to destroy Brett so Ted could look like the good guy. A word to any player or coach-STAY AWAY FROM GREEN BAY until Ted Thompson and his sidekick Mike McCarthy are gone.

Jero D
Jan 13, 2009
05:29 PM

...and if released Brett would have been in purple. I think that would rub more on the fans that it would Thompson.

I Digress. Unless money was an underlying issue, it sounded like Nolan didn't want to come to GB. He has ties with the Broncos and wanted to remain close to the West Coast. Now, Denver is almost half of a continent from the West Coast, so take it as you will...

Either a candidate is still in the playoffs, or they really wanted to land Nolan. I do agree with Scott M, the good DCs might be out leveraging for one of those HC job openings.

...and now is Herm on the hot seat in KC this late?

EPM
Jan 13, 2009
06:54 PM

Interesting comments here about whether Green Bay is an attractive place for players. You might recall that Ron Wolf and Mike Holmgren went to lengths to reverse that perception when they were rebuilding the franchise back in the early 90's. They brought in barbers from Milwaukee once a week who specialized in cutting African-American hair, and switched up the training table menu to include food that would appeal to African-American players. Those kind of actions really demonstrated to the players that management understood them, and would work to accomodate their preferences even on the frozen tundra.

But most of all they focused every effort on winning, which in the end is what all players want regardless of whether that happens to be in Green Bay, Buffalo, Pittsburgh or sun-drenched spots like Miami or San Diego. As it turned out, winning trumped cold weather and a lack of cultural diversity for this team.

In the end, it was all about finding the right combination of players -- both veteran and unproven -- to win the Super Bowl. That focus on winning has enabled Green Bay to be one of the most successful franchises in football for a decade and a half. The legacy has transcended all of the changes in leadership and coaching that the Packers have experienced over the years.

And now Mark Murphy, Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy have oversight and ownership of the legacy Bob Harlan, Ron Wolf and Mike Holmgren began. As a season ticket holder and life-long Packer fan, I'm of course hopeful that they are successful in perpetuating the level of success Green Bay has enjoyed for so long.

It was the right move, in my opinion and certainly in retrospect, to move to Aaron Rodgers and away from Brett Favre. Was the situation handled well? I don't know. Seems to me that both Brett and the Packers did a nice job of painting themselves into a corner.

Have the Packers managed every other personnel move well since Murphy, Thompson and McCarthy took over? No, not every move has been managed well. And these guys are certainly receiving a lot of criticism for the results.

My conclusion is that the 2007 team over-achieved and won more than their fair share of close games. Brett and McCarthy got plenty of credit for that. As the saying goes, sometimes it's better to be lucky than good.

In contrast the 2008 Packers under-achieved and lost more than their fair share of close games. The '08 experience certainly did expose the team's inexperience and talent deficits at certain positions.

It would be inaccurate to say that the Packers are an absolute train wreck ala Detroit or Oakland. The optimist and fan in me has the Packers adding a few pieces next season. In this league of parity, a few good breaks and close wins could have them right back in the playoff mix.

But Murphy, Thompson and McCarthy will need to be very attentive to the details that created the Packer legacy in order for that to happen. Time will tell if their formula for personnel management, free agency, the draft, etc. is brilliant or short-sighted.

VinMan
Jan 13, 2009
06:59 PM

To all those people who say the packers "lose out" because of the weather and various racial issues.

All I can say is doubtful. Money is the reason for going anywhere via free agency.

Additionally, the thing fans forget is that this is not fantasy football. Most players of any quality aren't gonna make it to free agency in the first place.

Finally, to all those who are still on the Favre bandwagon. Give it a rest. He's done, the pack knew it, only his ego wanted to prove Thompson wrong.

Peter
Jan 13, 2009
07:35 PM

VinMan - I agree with you for the most part. Except for, sometimes teams are forced to let a player test free agency. Look at Carolina this year. Jordan Gross and Peppers will both be FAs. They can only franchise one of them. If they don't get the other to agree to a deal before, he will for sure test the waters.
I do agree with you that neither weather nor race are big factors. Especially since McCarthy doesn't practice outside. Money, as well as the chance to win, are factors in free agency, but there also is the factor of how players are treated and whether coaches are respected. For coaches going somewhere, it would be, at least in my opinion, the chance to really have a say in coaching and not being told what to do, the personnel to play a preferred scheme, and of course money too. Don't get me wrong, I am far from being a Thompson or McCarthy basher, and I think trading Favre was absolutely the right move, but what I am wondering looking at the coaching staff of this past season and comparing it to Holmgren staff, there seem to be an awful lot of yes men on this 2008 staff. Philbin, Campen, McAdoo, honestly do you think they are very strong personalities standing up to McCarthy? That may play a role too. Just speculation on my part of course, but from the outside looking in, it just appears to be like that.

george c. costanza
Jan 13, 2009
08:16 PM

i don't think Vince Young is done. I think some team might get a great qb cheap if they play their cards right

Terry in San Antonio
Jan 13, 2009
09:04 PM

Mary Simon, spare me your Brett Favre grief. He was exposed as being a me-first, selfish, flake. He deserved what he got in Green Bay. No player is above the team. Even him.

Vince Young is DONE as far as being a significant NFL quarterback is concerned.

BigJohn
Jan 14, 2009
10:43 AM

Terry--

Mary speaks for more than half of the Packer Nation. You should not dismiss such sentiments on the strength of some nebulous notion that Favre was "selfish."

Ted Thompson, the miserable despot that he is, thought he was bigger than the team when he locked an active roster member out of the Packers facility back in August, alienating much of the fan base.

Next 13 - 24 of 29 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)