I was hiking a mountain gorge in Oregon on a beautiful Saturday afternoon in mid-June. The waterfalls were rushing, the streams were flowing and … the cell phone was buzzing up a storm! After ignoring the 601 area code calls as much as I could, I finally picked up. On the other end was the preview of the midsummer classic that the sports world has been treated to between Brett Favre and the Green Bay Packers. It was Bus Cook, Brett’s representative, and he laid out in great detail what was happening with Brett and the Packers, with Brett’s soon-to-be-public desire to return and with the Packers’ soon-to-be-public desire that he stay retired.
Bus is a friend and longtime professional colleague, having negotiated several times on Brett’s behalf, including the 10-year contract we negotiated in 2001. We hoped, at that time, that Brett would play three years, and he now enters year eight of that contract.
I listened to Bus and confirmed his understanding of the waiver and reinstatement rules. I kept it to myself and continued, as best I could, my peaceful and long awaited hike.
It all felt too close for comfort, as I not only have a relationship with Brett and Bus through the years, but obviously others involved in the debate.
A few days prior to the call, I had lunch with a good friend from my nine years with the Packers’ front office. We talked about many subjects, one of which was Brett, but did not dwell on the possibility of him returning.
And on the day prior to my Oregon hike, I was in California having lunch with Aaron Rodgers, a good friend and favorite of mine and others at the Packers, including general manager Ted Thompson.
I will keep the content of these conversations private out of respect for all of the parties involved in this summer drama. Having had a front-row seat to this group over the past several years, it is sad to watch it unfold as it has, a 16 year relationship reduced to sniping, retreating to favored media contacts, ignored text messages and petty accusations. No matter what the reasons, it is distressing for the relationship between a proud franchise and its most famous player to be termed a “divorce.”
In the end, neither side truly got what it wanted – Brett did not get to play for the Packers or Vikings and the Packers did not convince him to stay retired -- but that is the result of most negotiations (which this clearly became): no one wins, but there is resolution.
I am torn with a lot of emotions on this one. I will have much more on this. Not reveal any deep confidences, but say more.
Wow, this site is awesome!! I heard you on Jim Rome last week Andrew and I wrote myself a note to check this site out when it launched and am I ever glad I did, great stuff keep it up!! One quick question, I have to plead ignorance on this but how come you no longer work for the Packers??
Andrew- you must not have been in too rural an area if your cell phone was getting reception. ;)
I wonder if Brett realized how much him wearing a Viking jeresy would have hurt his legacy? Like I told a buddy: "the Vikings? does he want to sleep with my wife too?"
Andrew, glad to see you're doing well with NFP and this will definitely become a must read daily website for me. I'm curious about your thoughts on the upcoming uncapped year coming up, could you post an article on that (or maybe I missed already).
As a Packers fan, I really appreciate how well you have set us up for the future. Thank you. I was really sorry to see you break with the organization. Hopefully it's not permanent.
Andrew -
Nice to see this up and running. I believe my dad wallpapered your house in Green Bay a few years back (he has since passed away due to a sudden heart attack).
Great site.
I have a question. Given the Packers current trend of building a team through youth (as you cited in your article on Joe Horn), do you think the Packers will extend Mark Tauscher for fair market value before his contract runs out at the end of 2008?
Thanks again! I will be reading this site often.
Steve-
Mark Tauscher is a core player for the Packers and has been for a while. Great guy and solid player.
Andrew
Andrew,
I feel like management handled this poorly, so much so I even slowed down looking at packer web sites. I think Ted Thompson wants his footprint on this team and Brett Favre was not "his" guy. I would love to get 30 minutes with you, Bob Harlan and Ron Wolf to see what the real truth is. I also think you may not be there anymore because you are not one of "his" guys. I get what you did for the Green Bay Packers and as a real fan, even in "da bears" country, THANK YOU.
Bill C-
Thank you for your kind remarks. Enjoy the site.
Andrew
Andrew this is the first time I have written on a blog, and the kind remarks are the truth! You silence on the matter speaks volumes.
Thanks again for all you have done for our team.
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Looking back on an unconventional,...
Andrew and Sid discuss Ricky Williams,...
Also, Gruden’s extension, Adams’...
Andrew Brandt and Sid Rosenberg...
Still looming: How many will lose...
Aug 13, 2008
08:15 AM
Big John-
Yes, 5 year contracts are standard for that part of the first round. In the new CBA, teams are allowed to award 6 year contracts to picks 1-16 and 5 years for picks 17-32. Those are the maximum years allowed. For all other rounds, 4 years is the maximum.
Andrew