RSS

Final Projects

Unfortunately, that’s what our students said -- that football has the rosiest outlook of the major sports. I disagree. The NFL faces as big a range of challenges as it has faced at any time since 1961 with the passage of the Sports Broadcasting Act, which allowed the NFL to pool broadcast revenues. Robert Boland

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This May 12, 2009, 06:43 AM EST
17 Comments

The finishing graduate students in our Masters of Sports Business program at NYU do a final-semester research project to graduate. Last Friday, I sat through those presentations. I do a lot of grading at this time of year. My colleague, Dr. Fred Mayo, has done a marvelous job teaching our students how to do valid and reliable research, and he had the timely idea to have groups of our sports students look at the economic health and strategic plans of the major sports leagues for weathering the current financial storm. With an NHL team in bankruptcy, with fans coming disguised as empty seats in the $1.5-billion Yankee Stadium and with a marquee player in baseball suspended 50 games after testing positive for using a banned a female hormone, it’s easy to think that the NFL is in better shape than most other sports leagues, and that nearly every commissioner would trade places with Roger Goodell. 

Unfortunately, that’s what our students said -- that football has the rosiest outlook of the major sports. I disagree. The NFL faces as big a range of challenges as it has faced at any time since 1961 with the passage of the Sports Broadcasting Act, which allowed the NFL to pool broadcast revenues.

The Problems Looming

1. A Tale of Two Cities

The NFL and its teams have come to be in two very different businesses in recent years. The league manages broadcast, commercial and financial activities. Teams generate money from the gate but bear almost all the costs of creating the football product. Ask someone on the league level and they will say things aren’t so bad, and they aren’t, with $10 billion of licensing and broadcast revenue flowing through the league headquarters at 280 Park Avenue. However, ask somebody on the team level and they’re worried. Player costs have risen more than 45 percent in three years, and there hasn’t been a similar increase in revenue. While teams share in league revenues, they pay all the costs -- and players aren’t getting cheaper.

2. Two Different Customers

The teams are also nervous watching those empty $2,500 – now marked down to $1250 -- seats in Yankee Stadium because they only make money when people come to their games and, more importantly, buy their pricier upgrades like club seats and luxury boxes. If they aren’t coming for the Yankees, the dominant team in their sport in the nation’s largest market, what does that mean to football teams in smaller markets? The New York Giants have mostly sold their personal seat licenses (PSLs) for their new stadium, but they decimated a 30-year season ticket waiting list in the process. The Jets are struggling to sell theirs, and the need to sell PSLs has been a big factor in their trading for Brett Favre and trading up for Mark Sanchez

This isn’t as much of a problem for the folks in suits at the league level because their primary customer is a bigger audience than just the folks who come to games. It’s everybody who uses a credit card, buys a jersey and watches a game on television. The league and its teams have not been in sync for a while on who their customer is, and that split shows up on an almost daily basis. But it’s hard to grow a fan base or expand interest if the games are so costly that regular people can’t go to them.

3. Broadcasting Ain’t What it Used to Be

Advertising revenues figure to decline in the near term as auto makers struggle and beer makers consolidate. Thank heaven for fast food and cola wars or nobody would be advertising at all. It’s ad revenues that support the NFL, and it will be good if they remain flat. They could fall, and fall hard.  Expect more and more of the NFL to move off free television and end up on cable, where subscriber fees help make up for lost advertising.

4. Debt, Debt and More Debt

The NFL has the highest team valuations, but those valuations are, to a degree, carefully inflated and manipulated because they also support a high debt level. Debt is carried by the league and its teams. It is mostly good debt because it helped teams build stadiums and raise revenues, but in the face of falling or flat revenues those debt service costs will take a bite out of the product on the field. We’re already seeing coaching staffs downsized and expensive older coaches put out to pasture or opt out on their own. Players will be next. The NFL is essentially a development of “McMansions,” where all the owners have big mortgages. As long as values stay up, things will be OK, but if the overall value of franchises drop, even just a little, paying those mortgages get harder and harder.

5. Coming Labor Issues

My students thought lockout. I don’t, as the television contracts are too important to the league not to play and are up for renewal in 2011. But I see the uncapped year in 2010 being an experiment a lot of owners welcome because it also removes the salary floor. The key question is, will some teams electing to pay less and a few electing to pay more (Washington) create the kind of competitive imbalances that football hasn’t faced since the 1960s, when television revenue sharing and the common draft gave every team a chance to be competitive?

6.  Commissioners Need Accomplishments

The most successful commissioners, even the ones who just survive, usually are able to point to a remarkable accomplishment early in their tenure.  Rozelle did the television deal and Tagliabue the G3 program. Goodell is waiting for his. He might say the disciplinary policy is that defining accomplishment, but even today, there were rumors, promptly denied by the club, that the Jets had an interest in repeat offender Adam “Pacman” Jones.  The mere fact that we’re still talking about Jones -- or where the soon-to-be-free Michael Vick might be playing -- means the disciplinary policy hasn’t done enough to make it too expensive or too difficult for keep teams from giving the worst offenders their 439th last chance. No, Goodell’s test of leadership is coming. It will be in how he steers the game through the next 12-24 months.

7.  Football Will Survive, but is it Thriving?

I’m not talking about the NFL but the health of the game at its lower levels.  There are not as many young people playing now as in the past. The regard young players are held in has changed. Maybe I just want to live in a Chip Hilton fantasy world, where the high school hero is a paragon of virtue, but how many people out there see football and football players that way today? A sport can make money off the chaos and violence of “Any Given Sunday.” Just ask Vince McMahon. But we can’t preserve a game without heroic players who represent the best of who we are. I heard from one today; they’re out there if we look -- Newark, N.J., Mayor Cory Booker, a former Stanford tight end, Rhodes Scholar and a young mayor trying to fix a long broken city. The NFL needs protect the game and the opportunity of young people to play it.

Comments

Add a Comment
Mikey
May 12, 2009
09:05 AM

Finally, someone that understands the NFL has peaked as a sports league. The only thing missing is the two foundations:
1. Revenue sharing
2. Parternship with TV

Are bring eroded by the owners and can only be done with a weak commissioner.

GC in DC
May 12, 2009
10:00 AM

Fantastic post. Would be interesting to look at how individual teams develop in terms of marketing specifics of their market. I remember reading in Michael Lewis's Moneyball, for example, that the A's studied what was the critical factor in attracting people to the game, and they found it wasn't home runs or steals - it was winning. It would be interesting to see if any teams identify their key ticket-buying audience and then build a team to best fit that market. The best example I can think of in all sports is the 1980s Lakers, who were fast and glamorous.

Pat
May 12, 2009
10:05 AM

Attendence is the number 1 problem facing the league. I don't think the economy is really anything but a short term problem. Teams are and have been building stadiums to try to attract customers to the game. These are the proverbial cash cows for individual teams, but I think it will be increasingly difficult find it hard for them to sustain this revenue intake. After the novelty of these newer stadiums wears off, how are owners going to attract fans to the stadium? With improving TV technology, what is going to keep people from watching their favorite team, plus any other games that may be on another channel (plus keep track of fantasy teams), from home? A big screen and a group of friends can be just as preferable to the live action game, and is cheaper over the long haul. Why spend $1000+ for a PSL, then a minimum of several hundred a year for season tickets every year when you can buy a 40' screen and tailgait food for the price of a PSL? So TV may have brought a golden age to the NFL, but it may also be its ultimate demise.

Jayme
May 12, 2009
10:19 AM

Yes, football is facing a ton of problems. But every other league is, also, and they aren't in as strong a position as the NFL. While NFL teams may be facing budget shortfalls, I haven't heard any recent news that tells me that they are anywhere near what the NBA is facing. The MLB has been so competitively imbalanced that there are teams that are thrilled when they make the playoffs for the first time in 27 years, and teams that cry when they don't make it to the World Series. As for the NHL, a majority of their games, including playoffs, is shown on Versus, not a big 4 broadcast channel.

As for personal seat licenses, has there been a bigger joke lately? Everyone complained about them when they first started appearing, and now they are proving to be a horrible avenue for raising revenue. Just like all other bad ideas, they'll fade out and be (mostly) forgotten.

Michael Lombardi
May 12, 2009
10:59 AM
Michael Lombardi

Thank God, for the drug companies, (Levitra and others) or else the ad revenues will continue to shrink. This economy is going to benefit the teams that can solve problems with their thoughts, and not with their wallets.

Great post once again Bob.....Dr. Mayo needs to make a Post appearance...

Jf
May 12, 2009
11:01 AM

Interesting reflections, but I left puzzled on the point that the site leads with. You find it unfortunate that students, after doing their research, believe that the NFL is in better shape than most other sports. But there's no discussion of why the NFL is in worse shape than multiple other major sports leagues. Why are other leagues in better shape than other stories suggest; and why are shared problems (like those you mention of the Yankees) worse for football than for other sports?

ScottR.
May 12, 2009
12:02 PM

Like any product, the NFL is not guaranteed success in the future.

A season without a salary cap--ceiling or floor--would be horrible for the league. No one wants the NFL to turn into baseball, with a few big market teams overpaying for talent while others play it cheap and contend once every 10 years or so.

I would also encouarge the NFL to stop diluting the game--no extended seasons, no more rules against the defense for big hits, etc.

Uncle Rico
May 12, 2009
12:21 PM

"Thank God, for the drug companies, (Levitra and others) or else the ad revenues will continue to shrink."

Nice pun. Who knew it would also be affective in the treatment of advertile dysfunction, making it possible for ol' Goodell to sling the ad rev pigskin thru a swinging tire.

dan
May 12, 2009
12:39 PM

"The mere fact that we’re still talking about Jones — or where the soon-to-be-free Michael Vick might be playing — means the disciplinary policy hasn’t done enough to make it too expensive or too difficult for keep teams from giving the worst offenders their 439th last chance."

It's only Vick's 2nd chance. As for Jones, he's not signed. Even if he were, it would be to a tiny little thimble sized contract because a team is terrified of losing their investment if and when Goodell should suspend him again. THAT'S the effect of the policy. Think it through, Robert.

This whole post was kinda' scattered, actually. The mayor of Newark comes in out of nowhere to be a kinda' sorta' conclusion? What's up with that? I'm sure he's a fine man and maybe a good mayor, but how is bringing him up anything other than a tangent in this context?

WoodyG
May 12, 2009
01:06 PM

You start off including all sports & then quickly revert to 'only' the NFL. Your article would have better impact & be more representative of reality if you had compared the major sports instead of just comparing what was, what is & what will be in the NFL. My garden is full of weeds until I look at my neighbor's garden.

The NFL has always had issues. Always will. Does football even need to thrive to be relevant on Sundays??? I doubt NFL fans will ever opt for that Sunday picnic to replace football in the fall. That's the real bottom-line.

Pbrmeasap
May 12, 2009
01:10 PM

A huge piece that is often overlooked is the role that Fantasy Football has played to sustain the NFL machine. Conservatively, it is estimated that revenues generated indirectly as a result are $1 billion annually, particularly through increased Direct TV subscriptions. This has masked the underlying disconnect in the average fan's continued ability to access the product.

ScottR.
May 12, 2009
01:14 PM

Pb--That's a great point. I think legal gambling could help boost interest in the league as well.

Next 1 - 12 of 17 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)