It’s an interesting phenomenon to be on the same team at the same time yet remember the events of this time differently. Hearing and reading former Raiders WR Tim Brown’s interview this past week made me think that sometimes truth is relative. Brown shared some colorful anecdotes about past playing days and the QB who was responsible for the success we had in those days, Rich Gannon. He also mentioned the potential attacks on Rich he was able to avert. Although I missed all the times Rich was “sure enough jumped on” or “almost” jumped on, I definitely didn’t miss the losing. And Brown was right about one thing, Rich did come in with a hatred, but not for the Raiders. His hatred was for the overall lack of discipline that had come to define the organization. Being from Nebraska and very accustomed to winning, I had an instant respect for a guy who not only expected our teammates to be on time for meetings, but to not sleep or eat during them, and to know their routes and assignments as well. I know, pretty incendiary stuff. So to avoid the Bruce Springsteen cliché, I decided to talk to Rich mostly about the 2008 Raiders. And although we don’t usually speak so formally about our former team, we did this week as to avoid being jumped.
AT: What are your thoughts on JaMarcus?
RG: Physically, I don’t think there is any question he can play and be productive.
What we need to find out is how he is progressing mentally in terms of his
capacity to grow and master this system. All the great ones are masters of
their domain. They understand the game plan as well as the play caller. This
can take awhile. Can he take over this team from a leadership standpoint and make it his own? Because clearly, this is a team that is yearning for leadership. As for this season, the coaching change and play caller change will only retard his development.
AT: Do you think Al Davis can handle the Raiders?
RG: With some assistance from a solid GM and personnel department.
AT: Instead of a mid-season coaching change, what would you have liked to see
happen?
RG: The problem should have been addressed and settled in the off-season. But I
think the damage was done. Communication between the owner and the coach
has to be ongoing and productive. I don’t think that has ever been the case.
AT: What were Kiffin’s missteps? What were Al Davis’?
RG: Both made poor decisions. I wasn’t there but I’m sure it wasn’t just one.
AT: Have you spoken with Kiffin? What advice have you offered him?
RG: Yes. I told him to hang in there, keep his head up because he is a good coach
with a bright future.
AT: On what specific issues and philosophies were you and Al Davis divergent?
RG: The discipline, structure and systems of the organization must be key components of any successful team
AT: What are the top 3 things the Raiders should do now to start moving in a positive
direction?
RG: Hire a GM, Head Coach and Player Personnel guy who are all on the same page
and have the same commitment to turning things around. Then give them the
authority to make key decisions as it relates to personnel.
AT: Why was Gruden’s experience different than the other head coaches? How was he able to succeed in Oakland?
RG: Because there was no one else like him. He was tough, smart and hard working
and he was able to work despite the set-up in Oakland.
AT: Why do you think you had such a successful run?
RG: Honestly . . . Gruden, Bruce Allen, Callahan . . . let’s start there.
AT: Best memory as a Raider? Worst?
RG: Every win with Gruden was memorable because we both put so much into each
game. Worst . . . that’s easy, the Super Bowl debacle.
AT: What was the most frustrating aspect of playing for the Raiders?
RG: I don’t want to offend anybody so let’s just say things could have been different
and even better than our 3 straight AFC West Titles, AFC Championship Game
appearances and a trip to Super Bowl XXXVII.
AT: With your playing days behind you, would you ever coach?
RG: No.
AT: So in closing, what types of players should the Raiders start drafting and signing?
RG: Players who are tough-minded, disciplined, smart and have a desire to be the
very best at what they do. Players who aren’t afraid to speak the truth and
challenge the system. Players who lead by example and help those around them
be better. Where are these players? They just don’t grow on trees; you have to
train them. This is where the Raiders are failing miserably.
Following the Raiders very closely pre and post Rich Gannon, I have to say that those were very special years. Most teams would be satisfied to have been through a run like that, but not Rich Gannon. That is what made him special on the field as an NFL MVP and Pro Bowler, and that is what makes him so good in the booth during NFL broadcasts now. Like a good friend of mine once said, they should have a statue of Rich out in front of 1220 Harbor Bay Pkwy for what he was able to do in such a hostile environment.
Rich, thanks for all of the good years and YOUR "Commitment to Excellence"
BTW, it is nice to see you still keep such good company with a classy guy like Treu.
What a boring interview! With all of the gossip and dirt that goes on in Oakland...I thought there would be some more honest answers from Gannon and hard hitting questions from Treu.
When I listen or read an interview, I want to learn something from it. There was no NEW news or compelling story here.
Gannon has talked alot of smack, but why would he slow down now? What was his real conversation like with Kiffin? What is his beef with Al? Did he have any issues in the Raiders' locker room? Did he try to get Callihan to change the playbook up a little before the worst superbowl recorded? These are questions that would have liked to here true answers for.
Everyone wants to blame the disfunction and Al when the Raiders are loosing. Including Gannon. Tim Brown said Gannon was a Raider hater, and coming from KC, he probably was, and as an announcer, he still is. Loved him as a player because he never gives up. But never gives any credit to this organization when he announces games. I should mute the TV when he is an announcer.
Rich was an outstanding QB for the Raiders. I am certain too, that when he started challenging the slugs on the team to do their jobs, they moaned and groaned. Hey, isn't it enough to show up for a paycheck? I see this attitude everyday and it sickens me. Good interview, Adam.
Hey Lukko, try reading between the lines a bit. Why should Rich give the worst team in the NFL for wins and losses since 2003 any credit?
BARON,
Reading in between the lines is called "MISCOMMUNICATION" in my book.
I was just expecting a little more juice in an interview with an ex-player.
Treu was the only one to get a little dicey. Protecting his QB. He laid down some sarcasm about the ONLY player to try to help Oakland in this tough time. Everyone else has muttered some negative thoughts and turned their backs.
Since Tim has said something, it seems like Gannon has slowed down on his critcism. As you can see in this interview. But I would rather Gannon get it off of his chest.
John,
I can't say agree with your assertion that Brown's been the "ONLY" player to try to help Oakland. I think he's just the only player who is sure to let the press know about it.
You are probably right, Adam.
Brown's positive comments are just the first that I heard publically in years. It is easy to hate the Raiders. And right now they are an easy target. I just think that this team needs positive reinforcement because there is a lot of negativity surrounding the Raiders. I don't want that to rub off on our new young talent. Gannon was so successful and seemed like he got better with age. I wish he could help this organization rather than state his discontent with Al and how sad the Raiders are. Many Raiders fans love him, but so many more would respect him if he became a mentor to a young Jamarcus.
If he doesn't want to ooach, will he GM?
Re Tim Brown, the reason Gannon was "hated" was because he wouldn't tolerate the usual Raider BS and indiscipline. It's a compliment to be hated by jackasses.
John, Totally agree.
Hey Adam, We weren't a highly disciplined team when we won 3 Super Bowls either.
Just win baby.
Jim,
Although I think he'd be good at it, I don't think Rich is interested right now in being a GM. And I don't dislike Tim Brown-- I just found his comments to be odd considering Rich was influential in getting us to win. But I'm old school, admittedly so. I like rules and would've loved to play for a coach like Parcells. So Rich didn't offend me in the least.
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Says he hasn't spoken to Lerner...
Running back has hip injury
Will miss Sunday's game vs. Atlanta
Two Titans combined for $17,500...
Heap has sore ribs, Ngata has...
Oct 20, 2008
09:14 AM
ADAM!!!!
Again, great post. I am a big Gannon guy, and I liked him as a QB before he was even a Raider. He led both the Vikings and the Chiefs to the playoffs in seasons where Salisbury and Grbac were injured; and then those teams gave the position back to Salisbury and Grbac in their first playoff game, and they lose.
When he became a Free Agent from the Vikings, I told my dad that the Raiders should sign him; and when the Chiefs signed him, I was upset, and fearful that he'd win the starting job from Grbac. When Gruden brought him in (finally), I knew we had a winner.
Please pass this on to Rich, "I hope you reconsider being a coach. I think you could do wonders coaching a guy like Jamarcus, Flacco, Matt Ryan, or any other young QB coming into the league." Thank you both for awesome memories, and I, like you, wish things had gone better for us.