6 February 2009
QUOTE: “Experience is the teacher of all things.” ~ Julius Caesar, Commentarii de Bello Civili (Commentaries on the Civil War), 50s or 40s BC
FROM MIKE REISS OF THE BOSTON GLOBE... There is a strong possibility the Patriots will trade Cassel, though Patriots coach Bill Belichick did not indicate that as an option in his comment in today's press release. "Matt has been a pleasure to coach his entire career and last season in particular, when his years of hard work and commitment resulted in a most impressive performance," said Belichick. "We look forward to working with Matt again in 2009." Today was the first day teams can designate franchise and transition players. The 26-year-old Cassel, who made 15 starts after Brady's injury, completed 63.4 percent of his passes and threw for 3,693 yards and 21 touchdowns with 11 interceptions. He becomes the first offensive player and just the fourth Patriot to be franchised by the team, joining Adam Vinatieri (2002 and 2005), Tebucky Jones (2003) and Asante Samuel (2007).
Now the interesting part of the Matt Cassel saga begins. The Patriots, as we told you a month ago, would take this step, but now the drama is about to unfold. Clearly, the Patriots want more than the low third-round compensatory pick they would have received from the NFL. Who will be the major players in this sweepstakes? Here is an educated guess.
THE OBVIOUS TEAMS
DETROIT LIONS -- The Lions are in the best position to make this decision. As they evaluate college quarterbacks, they can measure how Cassel compares to the quarterbacks in the draft. They can part with their second first-round pick, 20th overall, and feel like they’ve gotten two blue chip players in the first round. It will cost more than the 20th pick overall, but for the Lions, they must think quality over quantity, and getting two quality players is much better than four good players, especially if one of the quality players is a quarterback. There is a deal here -- but first things first. Someone in the Lions’ building must make the determination which player is better, Matthew Stafford, Mark Sanchez or Cassel.
MINNESOTA VIKINGS -- This team, as much as any in the league, needs one more piece to make a significant difference in its roster. Finding a legitimate quarterback was the first order of business when head coach Brad Childress took over, but he has failed so far. With a talented quarterback, the Vikings go from being contenders in the NFC North to Super Bowl contenders. They currently have the 22nd pick in the draft. They could part with that and another second rounder and would be close enough to make a deal. I’m not sure that will be enough to satisfy the Patriots, but they will be in the ballpark. The Vikings have the cap room, the willingness to make a trade (as evidenced by their deal last year to acquire Jared Allen) and a huge need. I would make them the early frontrunners. Childress is on the hot seat, and fixing the quarterback position might help him avoid more heat.
TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS -- After seven years of Jon Gruden moving and changing quarterbacks and getting older at the position, the Bucs are now desperate to fix things. They have a huge need and a ton of cap room. They have a mid-level first-round pick (19th overall), a young head coach and a young defense. The time is right to make a bold move and find a long-term answer at quarterback. Matt Ryan (Atlanta) and Drew Brees (New Orleans) are fixtures in the NFC South. The Bucs need to find a fixture, too, and right now they don’t an answer.
SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS -- Who is the 49ers’ quarterback? Are they going to go back to Alex Smith or do they really think Shaun Hill is the answer? The 49ers have to address the quarterback position and find a long-term answer. They have cap room, they have the right pick (10th overall in the first round) and they have a need. However, I’m not sure anyone in the 49ers building is going to have the fortitude and the will to make this happen. They will convince themselves that Hill can lead the team. But they need to understand that they won all those championships because of the quarterbacks. Maybe the late, great Bill Walsh’s voice will be heard somewhere in the building, reminding the 49ers what made them great.
ST. LOUIS RAMS -- Someone in the building gave Marc Bulger a huge contract, and I’m sure that person is gone. But new coach Steve Spagnuolo and new GM Billy Devaney must fix this position before they can think about turning around the team. Bulger might have the money, but he doesn’t solve the long-term problem. The Rams are like the Lions -- they have to make their determination of Cassel as he compares to college players. Unlike the Lions, the Rams just have their own high pick, and I doubt they would be willing to make that move. I suspect the Rams will not be strong players in the Cassel market.
CHICAGO BEARS -- At some point, the Bears will have to address their quarterback situation. There were times last season when Kyle Orton appeared to have a good handle on things, but after sustaining an ankle injury, he was not the same productive player he was earlier in the year. The Bears need a marquee player on offense, someone they can build around and make all the other pieces fit. They need someone they do not have to manage but who can run a complete offense. The need is there, but I doubt the Bears will be serious players. They have the 18th pick in the first round, but they hate to part with picks.
NEW YORK JETS -- Jet fans can forget about Brett Favre coming back. It doesn’t look good, or even make sense, for the long- term future of the team. The Jets are in a mess at quarterback, not because they made the Favre trade but because they picked a pass-catching tight end at the bottom of the first round instead of Chad Henne, the quarterback from Michigan who went to Miami. I like Dusty Keller as a player, but they needed a quarterback then and they need one now. However, if you ask anyone inside the building, they all seem to be smoking the Brett Ratliff great-player pipe. Let us face it, even though Eric Mangini is gone as head coach, the Pats and Jets are not doing any deals. The Jets have the 17th pick in the first round but they’re going to be tight getting under the cap, and they still have to sign running back Leon Washington. This looks like a good idea on paper, but it probably won’t happen.
KANSAS CITY CHIEFS -- The Chiefs have all the elements in place to make a deal for Cassel: new offensive-minded coach, new GM (who gets along with the Patriots) and a very high pick. So why won’t it happen? Well, for one, the Chiefs are high on Tyler Thigpen, who played well at times last season. They also might not want to give up the third pick of the NFL draft for a player they may feel is not much better than the one currently on their roster. The Chiefs will hold on to their picks and will be reluctant to part with any of them. GM Scott Pioli knows Cassel as well as anyone and knows what he brings to the table and how he is different from Thigpen, who I’m sure he knows well by now.
SLEEPERS
WASHINGTON REDSKINS -- The ‘Skins are going to live and die with their current quarterback, Jason Campbell, and have put the word out that they will not be players in the free-agent market. However, they will need to consider making this move and should do their homework before they dismiss the notion of a trade. Trust me on this, a year from now the ‘Skins will be looking for a quarterback.
CAROLINA PANTHERS -- They have too many other issues to fix and don’t have a first-round pick, but they have a huge need. They can’t count on Jake Delhomme much longer.
This is going to be very interesting to watch, but one thing all these teams must do is decide how Cassel compares with the draft class at quarterback. It is that evaluation that will allow teams to make the right decision.
The Tavern will be back on Monday. Thanks for all the comments and for reading.
Scot,
The Vikings aren't going to get Stafford or Sanchez with the 22nd pick. Given that the NFC is usually wide open every year, they can compete with a decent QB. If they can't get Stafford or Sanchez, and don't make a bid for Cassel, they will waste an otherwise good team and the Bald Guy will get fired.
...and anyone who thinks NE should trade Brady is crazy... Cassel has proven to be a good competent NFL QB, but he's no Brady.
Scot, he did not transfer because he was expecting to get the starting job after Plamer left. Then there was an open competiton when Leinart got there - and even carrol said - it was coin flip decision as to who was going to start. I give him more credit for sticking it out. Also, wait and see what he ends up "demanding" as he negotiates contracts with other teams. I bet he is reasonable and would just like a 4 year commitment at 7-8 mil a year. Not some 50mil bonus. He's pretty smart and in the vien of Brady. Who has never demanded top dollar because he knows it sucks resources away from his main objective.. SB wins.
In the past, Kraft has gone one record reflecting the organizational viewpoint that the Patriots actually prefer draft picks in the 15-31 range in terms of talent and value. I do not think they would want a top 5 or even top 10 pick for the amount they'd have to pay that player. Which is why a 22 from Minnesota would definitely be enough, in my opinion.
DAVE -- I must disagree. Cassel took a team that lost 24 starters and won 11 games in a year when the division got surprisingly competative. He played increasingly better as the season when on. He is the real deal...
Scot "Assuming that it won’t be a top 10 pick, those are incredibly valuable draft slots, where you anticipate that you will be getting a definite starter for four years on the relative cheap."
Relative cheap? Top 10 draft picks are VERY expensive, and are usually never worth the kind of money they get.
As for the Patriots missing the play-offs (at 11-5 no less) the reason was not Cassel. Matt led the Pats to a game tying TD against the Jets. It was the defense that gave up 20 yards on 3rd and 15 in OT that sealed their fate. (Don't ask about the wildcat debacle in Foxboro)
I'd expect the Pats to lean towards whatever NFC team makes the best offer. Cassel's short game is kryptonite to the Patriot defense in its currently form and BB won't want to face it in a play-off environment.
Andy, you are making Scott's point.
Teams are more reluctant to give up 12-25 slots because thats where all the value is. Good quality starters, but not top 10 money. The pats have been on this system since belicheck got there. And now the rest of the leauge is starting to catch on.
I NEED TO COMMENT ON DAVE'S REMARK, FIRST COMMENT ON HERE: That is one of the most idiotic statements ever. First off, he had a learning curve at the beginning of the season and chemistry to build with the first unit. Second, the rest of our team was decimated with injuries, so it wasn't the same team as in 2007. To go 11-5 in the NFL, and a few of those games we could just have easily won, as a 9 year back-up, isn't overrated. Is it Cassel's fault that David Thomas got that stupid penalty, or his fault that the Defense couldn't hold the Jets in overtime, or how about the first game against Miami when they played Wildcat all day against us. I suppose he made up the game plan with Sparano. I think you are overrated. Think before you speak
"LEts not forget that Cassel couldnt make the playoffs on a 18-1 team with an easy schedule , one of the most talented receiver corps and a great coach. HEs pretty overratted."
wow Dave, thanks for showing us that you know nothing about football. Did you see all the injuries the Pats sustained on the DEFENSIVE side of the ball? As far as an "easy schedule" is concerned, all of that is relative. let's examine that, shall we?
Pittsburgh- won the Super Bowl
Arizona- won the NFC
Miami(2x)- won the AFC East
San Diego- won the AFC West
Indy- 12-4
that's 1/3 of their schedule against playoff teams, not to mention 2x vs. the Jesters (9-7). So, in reality, half their schedule was played against teams with a >.500 winning percentage...and they lost the division on tie breakers(last time a team won 11 games and didn't make the playoffs was 1985)...all with a QB who was a 7th round pick and hadn't started a game since high school.
Got any more pearls of wisdom you want to share with us? Here's a hint- next time you post something, THINK first.
All the Patriot haters in the house stand up. You guys sound ridiculous calling Cassel a one year wonder etc. He only has played for one year, so yes he is a one year wonder but 1 for 1 is 100% isn't it? The Pats didn't make the playoffs but it wasn't due to lack of offense. In reality it came down to making plays on defense and they just didn't do it this year.
Cassel in his one year has shown that he is better than Tavaris Jackson so if you are Minn it is a no-brainer. He has certainly shown he is better than anyone on Detroit's roster, again a no-brainer. Same with Tampa if you consider Garcia too old and beat up. Same with the Jets without Favre and in my eyes even with Favre but I digress.
If you are KC do you really think Thigpen is an NFL QB? Remember what Mr. Lombardi always says: you are not evaluating whether he is the best QB on your roster, you must evaluate him against the rest of the league.
I would say these teams have no proven QB on the roster right now:
1. Jets
2. Bills
3. Raiders
4. Chiefs
5. Redskins
6. Vikings
7. Bears
8. Lions
9. Tampa Bay
10. San Fran
That doesn't include teams like Cleveland, Cincy and Carolina with QB questions due to injuries, age etc. So at least 1/3 of the teams have no QB as good as Cassel who in his only year of playing played better than you could ever hope to see Sanchez or Stafford play in the next 3 years.
If you are Brad Childress, with a championship caliber running game and defense you think you'd be better off with Stafford, Sanchez, Gus Ferotte or Tavaris Jackson instead of Cassel? Please!!
Are people blind to the fact that Cassell doesn't go down field at all?
His air yards--yards counting only from QB's hand to WR's hands (thus excluding YAC)--must be the lowest in the league.
Some team is going to vastly overpay for Cassell. I'd honestly rather have Derek Anderson.
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Fox’s future in Carolina is tied...
Both have problems, but playoff...
Raiders QB lacks motivation and...
The best defense is sometimes...
Bills new coach must embrace the...
Feb 06, 2009
11:06 AM
Matt Cassel.. Really? This much hype over a top 20 QB? This is a testament to the lack of QB talent in the league. We have 5 or 6. After that you need a top 5 Defense to get to a superbowl. Keep up the good work Mike.