10 February 2009
QUOTE: “I like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past.” ~ Thomas Jefferson
FROM PAT YASINSKAS OF ESPN.COM... Luke McCown, who could have become an unrestricted free agent at the end of the month, has been re-signed by the Buccaneers, the team announced Monday afternoon. With the new regime of coach Raheem Morris and general manager Mark Dominik taking over, this could be a sign that the Bucs are going to give McCown a shot at the starting job. That's something former coach Jon Gruden never did with McCown or any young quarterback, and his failure to develop a long-term plan was part of the reason he was fired in January. McCown received a $2.5 million signing bonus and a $2.5 million base in 2009. His base salary in 2010 is $2.5 million, but there are incentives that could take the deal to $7 million a year if he plays a lot next season. Regardless of whether he plays or doesn't play, the $5 million commitment the Bucs made to McCown, who has only four career starts, shows they are making some changes in the quarterback position.
This is a smart move for Luke McCown. He gets to compete for a starting job on a team he’s familiar with and is capable of leading. However, my instincts tell me that the Bucs will not stop with the signing of McCown. They will still want to draft a young quarterback who can be the centerpiece and brand of the franchise. One of the reasons Jon “Love you Bro” Gruden was fired was because he was unable to develop a long -term solution at the quarterback position. There may be a thousand valid reasons from the Gruden camp to explain why he never fell in love with one person, but the reality is that the lack of a young quarterback bothered the Glazer family.
McCown has never had a chance to prove he can be the main man. He was devastated the week of the Falcons game in Atlanta when he took most of the practice reps and was preparing to be the starter. However, on the day of the game, McCown was told before going out to warm up that Brian Griese would start. Gruden was just not capable of putting a younger player on the field, and this hurt McCown.
When Raheem Morris interviewed the last week of the season, he thought it was for the defensive coordinator post. But in reality, he was interviewing for head coach because the Glazers realized they needed to make a change. When Morris left the long meeting, he felt strange and wondered what had just happened, but he was delighted to be moving up the ladder. Part of that change will happen with the team, and especially at the quarterback position.
In addition, with David Carr redoing his deal with the Giants, the next question many are asking is, when is the Eli Manning extension coming? We’ve talked to people very close to Manning, we’ve talked to people very close to his agent, Tom Condon, and we’ve talked to people very close to the Giants -- and all have assured and confirmed to the Post that the deal is in place. The Giants are waiting for the right time to make the formal announcement.
FROM CLEVELAND BROWNS.COM... The last two players to start at quarterback for the Browns are no longer with the team. The Browns announced seven roster moves Monday. Ken Dorsey's contract was terminated, and Bruce Gradkowski was waived. The contracts of Antwan Peek and Terry Cousin were also terminated. Also waived were punter Mike Dragosavich, kicker Jason Reda and offensive lineman Eric Young. Peek's 2008 season ended in training camp after he suffered a knee injury. He played in 14 games (four starts) in his first season with the Browns in 2007 and had four sacks. Cousin, a 12-year veteran, signed with the Browns last spring and played in all 16 games last season as a backup cornerback, recording one interception and two pass breakups.
I always had a rule in pro scouting to monitor and really know each player a new staff would release because often a new coach will make change for change’s sake. In addition, this is an opportunity for other clubs to find some gems that might not fit in the new coach’s scheme. With all the changes in the NFL this year, there will be many great players on the street, and if your pro department has not evaluated all the players on all the teams, it will not be ready for the changes. Just evaluating free agents does not really provide enough insight of the potential players on the market. Free agency garners a ton of attention, but the best way to improve your team is to find younger players who may have a future. Alternatively, there will be some salary cap casualties. Once a player is terminated, there’s no time to watch tape; the pro department needs to have a report ready and be prepared to react quickly.
With every new head coach, there will be a ton of changes, and this is an area where the best pro departments can shine. You must know your scheme and know when a new scheme doesn’t fit the players. For example, Tampa Bay is going to change its defensive style and will want bigger linemen. A player like Chris Hovan does not fit in the new scheme. Therefore, the pro department can identify and target players who might be traded or released.
FROM SCOTT BROWN OF THE PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE REVIEW... Smith didn't play after the Steelers' Oct. 5 game in Jacksonville and the team put him on injured reserve in late December. Ken Zuckerman, Smith's agent, said the ninth-year veteran is healthy again. "If needed, he could have played in the Super Bowl," Zuckerman said. Essex has played sparingly in four NFL seasons and has just one career start at left tackle. Starks would almost certainly draw the most interest of the three on the open market. The 6-8, 345-pounder has started at right and left tackle on Super Bowl-winning teams, and he only turned 27 last month. Starks made almost $6.9 million last season, and he would be guaranteed $8.45 million next season if the Steelers use the franchise tag on him, or $7.74 million if they designate him a transition player.
I am still amazed the Steelers won a Super Bowl with Max Starks as their left tackle. Marvel Smith is the better player, but his back problems in recent years make it uncertain he can go 16 games next season. Starks bailed them out, and he was a critical player down the stretch, but if you watch the tape closely, the Steelers did a wonderful job protecting him and not allowing him to be on an island. Back problems for offensive linemen always are a concern and make it difficult to invest significant dollars in them.
The Steelers proved one thing: They can win with anyone at left tackle, and they might not be able to address their line needs until the draft.
FROM CALVIN WATKINS OF THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS... “Oh, definitely, big-time," Reeves said when asked if he was surprised by the clause. "For someone to question how I've done [my time] for a lot of years, I've never been questioned. Plus, as a coach, how can you verify that? Nobody punches a clock." When Reeves said he couldn't sign such a contract, he and Jones declined to work together.
Calvin Watkins wrote this a few days ago, and I’ve talked to many people who tell me that the story is correct. To defend the Cowboys here, in most consulting contracts in the business world, there is specific language that determines the amount of hours the consultant must work. So what’s the problem putting it in writing if you plan to work more hours anyway? I don’t think it was unreasonable for Jerry Jones to lay everything out in writing and make sure all parties agreed.
Now, for the real news out of Dallas regarding Terrell Owens. Peter King wrote this yesterday in his Monday Morning QB, and I believe he is dead-on accurate. When, not if, is the real question everyone is asking about T.O. He will not be back, but the team is still deciding when to make the announcement of his termination or trade.
Maybe Jones can work a trade out to send Owens to the Raiders since they have a huge need at wideout and have never been afraid to take on a big challenge. This will be interesting to follow as it develops.
Wow, that's a helluva thought for this early in the day. TO and Javon Walker on the same team - nope, no drama there at all! They better throw a therapist in the deal for that.
If the cowboys are lucky enough to find a trade partner for the services of T.O. how will that affect their salary cap situation?
Tayler--from a salary cap standpoint, AFAIK, there is no difference whatsoever between cutting a player and trading him; any remaining dead money is accelerated, while any unpaid salary is credited back to the cap.
Yikes, this is all we need... the "Summer of Rosenhaus". Owens, Boldin, James (and, I'm sure many others)... These scenarios are going to be painful to watch because D.R. will make sure to PUT HIMSELF front & center.
Don't you think the Reeves' matter is one of respect? Does anyone think Dan Reeves would be a slacker or someone who just wants to collect a check? We're not talking about some random consultant here, and it appears that Reeves must have taken this clause as a huge insult. Can't say that I blame him.
This is the first defense I have read of the min hours clause. Might someone be angling for a job here?
Actually, Mike is correct, most consulting work in the Real World includes time provisions because the costs are estimated based on time projections. The difference here would be that Reeves would've been functioning as a full-time staff member so in that regard, yes time specifications generally wouldn't be included because your minimum expected hours of work are defined by "full time" status.
So Mike is technically correct but JJ was wrong to put that in and Reeves was right to be insulted.
Whoever was right or wrong its probably best JJ and Reeves ended it when they did. Can't see that working out anyway.
I don't think even the Raiders would go after Owens. Not worth the draft pick. (What round were you thinking anyway, Mike?)
Owens is an all-timer but at this stage in his career, he's trending downward.
I do admit to being awfully curious to see where he winds up, though.
I could see T.O. working for a mid-rounder in Oakland. He'll just replace some obscure triangle-number monster who'll wait quietly on the sideline until he sufficiently proves he has been miscast as a football player. T.O. can at least actually play football. He can do so soon, even.
I love how people are saying "Not even Raiders would do that!"
I think we have learned the Raiders will do ANYTHING. Nothing is too far fetched. Absolutely nothing.
Can you imagine how this would impede Jamarcus Russells learning ability?
After trying to keep all the divas herded up and happy, I guess jj couldn't take a chance on that old rascal Reaves takeing advantage of him. Yikes, if you can't trust Reaves, you're one lonely soul.
I am sure Seattle would take him, maybe Arizona if they lost Boldin....
He is a tool, but he will have a job this season somewhere. He can still play at a high level.
Dear Al Davis,
Please do not take JJ's call. This team cannot be fixed with just one player. Please use your draft picks and FA money to fill multiple positions rather than blowing everything for one loud screaming, team destroying, over cuddled by his grandma prima-donna.
Regards,
Raiders Nation.
Look for WR off the Giants, Saints, or Packers. Those teams had a lot of depth there.
As for TO, he made an all time catch in the playoffs, but he still has weightlifter hands. He has to try and cruch the ball between fists to catch it so often. He can still create some separation but how long before he loses that step and is just another big guy trying to push off?
Is Braylon Edwards still complaining? Move one headache for another.... pass the aspirin and the vodka.
*crush
Michael, thank you for the blurb on the Steelers, Max Starks and their LT needs.
It is very unlikely the Steelers will wait until the draft to address LT. Not when they are $20 million under the salary cap.
Maybe some time you could comment (in your upcoming LT available in free agency report) on the following for Pittsburgh:
1. Could siging Tre Thomas be a 2-year stop-gap measure at the left tackle? Does he fit our system and would he take a 3-year deal similar to Flozell Adams'?
2. How much is Starks really worth? After getting paid $7 million last season and his solid effort for 14 games last year is he a $5 million/year player or a $6.5 million/year player or less?
3. Do you have any information on Tony Hills, who we picked up in the 4th round last season out of Texas. Should he even be a consideration or is he a non-factor?
OK folks settle down... this makes a lot of sense on several levels. The idea in my head is TO in a trade with Oakland for Asomuagh. Dallas just kicked Pacman to the curb, they have a need at CB. The Raiders have an obvious need at WR. Compensation would be the only remaining hitch. I've read the compensation level for Asomuagh is 2 first rounders if he were taged as an UNrestricted free agent and found a suitor. Dallas would have to pony up something else. What that something else would be is the ???
I shudder to think that the raiders wouldn't have at the least taken a hint from the Javon Walker fiasco. Bringing in TO to a team that has a ton of needs and has a ceiling of .500 in 09(being generous, and I'm a raider fan, shows how tempered our expecatations are) would only create discord and would negate any progress Cable made last year building a rapport with the players. Not to mention that the Cowboys have arguably the deepest Defensive backfield in the NFL: Newman, Henry, Jenkins, Scandrick. The cowboys are heavily invested in Newman (contract) and Jenkins (08 1st round pick). And Scandrick (also an 08 draft pick) showed promise last year, even getting playing time over Jenkins at times. Finally, the raiders have no problem franchising the best (or close to) corner in the game as they did more than once with Charles Woodson.
2 year deal only, after that he is posion
You are manifestly, a real master of thesis samples referring to this topic composing but when you are willing to select the buy dissertation service, I will advice you to find the best item.
| powered by TheSeats.com |
No one knows the future, but one...
Unconventional thinking, plus...
Questions and thoughts about the...
Super Bowl thoughts: Freeney,...
Is Browns GM serious about Tebow?...
Feb 10, 2009
09:40 AM
NOOOOOOOO! The Raiders need their draft picks, not TO. No doubting the guys talent but he's a proven menace 3 times over.