FROM WES BUNTING:
In Part V of the National Football Post’s position analysis, we take a closer look at the nation’s top linebackers and defensive backs. Since we started this series last week by ranking players No. 1 through 5, we resume our breakdown with prospects currently ranked 6 through 15.
Inside Linebackers
6. Jasper Brinkley, South Carolina (6-2, 252)
7. Dannell Ellerbe, Georgia (6-1, 236)
8. Antonio Appleby, Virginia (6-4, 243)
9. Gerald McRath, Southern Miss (6-3, 231)
10. Jason Phillips, TCU (6-1, 239)
11. Spencer Adkins, Miami (5-11, 230)
12. Worrell Williams, California (5-11, 240)
13. Dave Philistin, Maryland (6-2, 235)
14. Brit Miller, Illinois (6-0, 243)
15. Stanley Arnoux, Wake Forest (6-0, 232)
South Carolina’s Brinkley ranks sixth on our board and possesses ideal size and strength for the position. He’s a smooth-footed athlete and changes directions very cleanly at the line of scrimmage. He’s also a strong tackler but needs to do a better job playing as physical as his body indicates. A linebacker who definitely doesn’t have a problem playing physical is Appleby. He’s a big, thickly built athlete who does a great job attacking downhill and finding the ball. He’s an instinctive player and looks like an ideal 3-4 inside linebacker.
Two inside linebackers who possess the fluidity and athleticism to play both inside and outside are Ellerbe and McRath. Ellerbe is a fluid athlete who redirects well in coverage and does a nice job breaking down in space. McRath is a bit high cut for taking on blockers inside, but he possesses the speed and range to consistently make plays sideline to sideline. Both players lack great physicality inside but offer some versatility to a linebacking core.
Finally, undersized prospects Williams and Adkins lack ideal height but possess thick, sturdy frames and know how to play with natural leverage. Adkins is an explosive, quick-twitch linebacker with the range and speed (4.48) to consistently make plays in pursuit. Williams has played in both 4-3 and 3-4 schemes during his time at California but looks best suited to man the middle spot in a 4-3. He also adds some pass-rush ability from the middle linebacker spot.
Outside Linebackers
6. Marcus Freeman, Ohio State (6-1, 239)
7. Clint Sintim, Virginia (6-3, 256)
8. Tyrone McKenzie, South Florida (6-2, 243)
9. Kaluka Maiava, USC (6-0, 229)
10. Jason Williams, Western Illinois (6-1, 241)
11. Lee Robinson, Alcorn State (6-2, 249)
12. Zack Follett, California (6-2, 236)
13. Cody Brown, Connecticut (6-2, 244)
14. Julius Williams, Connecticut (6-2, 252)
15. Kevin Ellison, USC (6-1, 227)
4-3 outside linebackers Freeman and McKenzie rank sixth and eighth on our board and look like potential solid starters in the NFL. Freeman didn’t have the type of 2008 season many expected because of injuries but looked good at the Senior Bowl and has impressed during postseason workouts. McKenzie has been solid all year and simply finds ways to make plays on the ball. He isn’t as big or as fast as you’d like, but he redirects well in space and possesses the closing speed to finish plays. Maiava has been one of the most frequently overlooked prospects in this year’s draft, but he showcases the toughness and fluidity to be a real factor in all aspects of the game. He’s a bit undersized but plays with natural leverage and should hear his name called in the third/fourth round.

Small-school linebackers Jason Williams and Robinson have soared up draft boards during the postseason, and each looks to be solidifying himself a spot in the mid/late rounds. Robinson is a versatile, well-built athlete who knows how to get after the quarterback. He possesses impressive athleticism for a 250-pound linebacker and has the physical skill set to play in a 3-4 or 4-3 scheme. Not to be outdone is Jason Williams, who has really turned heads with his impressive workouts at a number of college pro days. Both guys have a lot of untapped potential and exhibit the physical skill sets to become starters in the NFL.
Virginia’s Sintim and Connecticut’s Brown are both 3-4 outside linebackers who should come off the board some time during the second/fourth rounds. One player who hasn’t received the recognition he’s due is Connecticut’s other defensive end, Julius Williams. Williams has been very productive over the past two years (8½ sacks in 2007 and six in 2008) and actually possesses a much more explosive first step off the edge than teammate Brown. He impressed during his pro day workout with 36 reps on the bench, a 41-inch vertical and a 4.58 40 time. The guy looks like an ideal 3-4 outside linebacker with the burst and athleticism to develop into a productive pass rusher. It wouldn’t surprise me to see Williams outperform Brown in the NFL.
Cornerbacks
6. Darius Butler, Connecticut (5-11, 183)
7. Asher Allen, Georgia (5-10, 194)
8. Kevin Barnes, Maryland (6-0, 187)
9. Coye Francies, San Jose State (6-1, 185)
10. Joe Burnett, Central Florida (5-10, 182)
11. Victor Harris, Virginia Tech (5-11, 198)
12. Jairus Byrd, Oregon (5-10, 207)
13. Christopher Owens, San Jose State (5-10, 181)
14. Brice McCain, Utah (5-9, 185)
15. Gregory Toler, St Pauls (5-11, 191)
Butler grades out similarly to the cornerbacks in my top five and could slip into the latter half of round one. He displays natural cover skills and has the versatility to play in both a man or zone scheme. However, it’s his ability to stick his head in vs. the run game and tackle that makes him such an attractive cornerback prospect.

Barnes and Francies are both tall, long-limbed defensive backs with impressive balance, body control and footwork for their size. They do a nice job redirecting in space and have the closing speed to consistently get after the ball. Allen and Burnett lack ideal height for the position, but both exhibit smooth, compact back-pedals and are very coordinated in and out of their breaks. Burnett does a great job turning and closing on the ball down the field, while Allen has the mental toughness to come in and play from day one, as he was consistently asked to play on an island in the SEC since his sophomore year.
McCain has always been overshadowed by his more publicized teammate, CB Sean Smith, but he’s a very good corner in his own right, and his 4.33 40 time at the Utah pro day opened some eyes. But no corner has moved up draft boards in the postseason like Toler. I was recently turned on to Toler, and when I finally was able to find some tape of him, I was shocked. He moves effortlessly in and out of his breaks and does a great job changing directions and redirecting in space. Obviously, there’s a big concern about the jump in level of competition, but Toler certainly possesses the size, speed and footwork to warrant a mid-round pick.
Safeties
6. Darcel McBath, Texas Tech (6-0, 198)
7. Louis Delmas, Western Michigan (6-0, 202)
8. Derek Pegues, Mississippi State (5-10, 199)
9. Brandon Underwood, Cincinnati (6-1, 198)
10. Emanuel Cook, South Carolina (5-10, 197)
11. Courtney Greene, Rutgers (6-0, 212)
12. David Bruton, Notre Dame (6-2, 219)
13. Michael Hamlin, Clemson (6-2, 214)
14. Trimane Goddard, North Carolina (5-9, 189)
15. Chris Clemons, Clemson (6-0, 208)
I have Delmas rated a bit lower than most draft boards because he simply takes to many bad angles in all areas of his game. I originally had him as one of my top safeties, but after watching him more closely, he consistently fails to break down in space and whiffs on too many potential tackles. He will produce some highlight-reel hits and flies around the field, but he doesn’t showcase the type of instincts and balance I want in a higher rated safety. McBath, on the other hand, does a much more efficient job taking proper angles, which resulted in six interceptions last season. He does a great job jumping routes and has the range and deep speed to make plays in the center field-type role. He’s also a solid tackler, breaks down well and shows a tenacity attacking the line of scrimmage.

Undersized safeties Cook and Pegues lack ideal height for the position but do a nice job redirecting in space and changing directions fluidly. Cook is a physical, strong safety who loves to throw his body around and bring down ball carriers. He lacks ideal straight-line speed but possesses the body control and balance to consistently get in and out of his breaks cleanly. Pegues is a former corner who possesses the footwork and ball skills for the position. He lacks ideal physicality but can play the center field-type role or kick into the slot on third downs.
Taller safeties like Hamlin (6-2) and Bruton (6-2) have nice-sized frames but lack the flexibility and quickness to redirect and get cleanly of their breaks. They’re both striders who can run sideline to sideline and track the football. However, they will struggle when singled up in man coverage at the next level and are simply to “leggy” when asked to turn and run on all areas of the field.
Loving the unusual depth of the draft coverage, Wes. Thanks. Do you see Nic Harris catching on anywhere? I don't know what position he'd ultimately play, but I'm assuming it would one of these.
Not sure how you see Darius Butler as the 6th ranked CB. If anything, he's probably the best pure CB in this draft...hands down. I understand playing for UConn probably downgrades him a bit but Vontae Davis is not a better CB. I can see Jenkins, Moore, and Smith but c'mon....6th?
As for LB rankings, I never agree with them because Teams rank them so differently depending on their system. I like Clint Sintim and Marcus Freeman at ILB in a 34. Brinkly is probably the 2nd best legitimate MLB in a 43.
Wes,
Would love a quick comment about two omitted CB's: D.J. Moore (Vanderbuilt) and Keenan Lewis (Oregon State).
Have seen both much higher on lists, so was curious. Thanks in advance.
A friend loves the Pats and was reading up on Brinkley from their site news that he gave the organization a visit.
They drafted three LB last year and appear committed to continued aquisitions there, enough to man every spot for a 3-4 with plenty of depth.
We got Pegues for one team and McBath as a BPA for another in that mock. McBath has played thousands of pass reps at Texas Tech and should have a lot of fully realized upside in that category as you relate his angle mastery for playing on the ball.
Those first four corners in the second tier list above, they are gamers. Two of them could certainly be there in the top 5 at the position(Butler and Allen).
Francies climbed with a strong finish to his season. He's played safety as well so he has the tough/nasty streak to match great anticipation. He's moved into the first day range on draft boards as a result.
Great write up again, Wes.
I have to agree with G, Butler is the best cornerback prospect in this draft in my mind. His hips and feet are the best in the draft, his speed is near the top, he's the best run supporting corner, he has potential as a corner blitzer and he has the added bonus of having excellent hands.
I mentioned this in top 5 defensive column for these position groups, that I think Brinkley is going to be the diamond in the rough of the inside linebacking class this year. With his knee finally healthy, he's primed to have an impact on the league at a bargain price for whoever drafts him.
Also, Wes, how would you rate Sintim as an ILB prospect in the 3-4? I've heard some teams that run the 3-4 have shown interest in him playing inside, presumably as a SILB.
There's a great feature about Toler on PackerReport.com. Got to be a subscriber to read it but the short version is he didn't have the grades to play college ball, he worked at JC Penney, and was noticed by a D-2 college that was just starting a football program. He's 5'11" and really fast so he's got the tools if he can adjust to the competition.
I see a coner from UCF on the top few coners but the guy that was on the opposite side of him was better. I think his name was Johnell Neal check the stats.This guy is really a sleeper some team or scout needs to wake up and put him on the board quick
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Agent says WR to work out for...
Jon Gruden's brother to coach...
Could Oklahoma's Bradford land...
Former linebacker admitted to...
Caldwell made the decision
Apr 07, 2009
01:18 PM
Wes:
Nice analysis for this (and other) position ranking groups. Two quick questions / comments:
1. The analyses themselves: do you conduct the analysis yourself, or do you rely upon other staff, GMs, scouts, etc? It would be interesting to view a range of opinions (which I am sure there are) on prospects.
2. Comparison to current or recent pro players: I have read other columns where analyses include comments by scouts / GMs about who the prospect reminds them of. Just thought that would be additional content that would be of interest to your readers.
Thanks, and good work.
Scott