FROM MICHAEL LOMBARDI:
We continue our division by division breakdown of pre-draft questions today by analyzing the NFC North. Here are five questions the Bears, Packers, Vikings and Lions need to address heading into next month’s draft.
Click HERE for a breakdown of the NFC East
Click HERE for a breakdown of the AFC East
Click HERE for a breakdown of the AFC North
NFC NORTH QUESTIONS BEFORE THE DRAFT
CHICAGO
1. Who will be the Bears’ quarterback and back-up? Why is it that when you talk about “Da Bears,” you always ask the same question?
2. Who will be the right tackle, or the left tackle? Can the Bears improve their line and gain four yards or more on first down? Last year, they were the worst team on first down to gain four or more yards.
3. Will the Bears find a wideout who can lead them in receptions? Last season, their tight end and running back were their leaders. The Bears were 26th in the NFL in passing.
4. Can they find a pass rush? The Bears’ defensive line needs a huge upgrade; they want to win games with their defensive line, but they can’t dominate the line play.
5. The Bears finished 31st in the NFL in allowing pass plays over 10 yards and under 20 yards, an indication of a lack of team speed and coverage. How will they improve in this area?
DETROIT
1. Who will be the Lions’ starting short- and long-range prospect at quarterback? They finished last in the NFL in 38 offensive categories. They must address this area.
2. Who will be the other wide receiver to play alongside of Calvin Johnson? The Lions having spent plenty of high picks on wideouts in the past but have just one left.
3. Size does matter in the NFL, so how will the Lions get bigger and more powerful on defense? The new scheme on defense requires size and power.
4. The Lions gave up 31 touchdowns rushing last year. Can they improve their talent in the defensive line to cut that number in half?
5. Can they find some good defensive players anywhere? Opponents had a 110 quarterback rating last season.
GREEN BAY
1. A change in schemes on defense means some changes in personnel. Who will be the rushers, and how can the Packers improve their pass rush? Last year, they ranked 25th in the NFL in sacks, with just 27.
2. Who will return kickoffs? The Pack ranked last in the NFL in starting field position and return average. Controlling vertical field position is critical.
3. The Packers tackled badly on defense last season and ranked 31st in yards allowed after the catch. Will they be able to improve this area with their healthy players?
4. Who will be the right tackle? And does the Pack have enough depth to handle injuries to their offensive line?
5. Do they have the right combination of defensive linemen to handle the new scheme? Last year, injuries depleted the line, so can they rebound this year -- and do they need more defensive linemen? I think they do.
MINNESOTA
1. Does the trade for Sage Rosenfels solve the “forever” quarterback problem in Minnesota?
2. The right side of Vikings’ offensive line is the weak link. Can they find a right tackle and move Ryan Cook to center?
3. Who will be the slot wideout and receiver who can convert key third downs?
4. Special teams is not going to improve just changing the coach. Talent and speed is what makes the teams improve. Can the Vikings find younger and faster defensive players to improve the kicking game? They have the worst coverage teams in the NFL.
5. Who will handle the safety positions to limit big pass plays? The Vikings allowed too many big pass plays last season, ranking 26th in the NFL.
Packers need sacks.
Julius Peppers gets sacks.
Get Peppers.
It's not rocket science...
That is an absolutely rediculuous statement goose. We had way more than "a couple" of injuries last year, and yet the Packers still outscored their opponents despite going 6-10. The corners showed no signs of slowing down last year and if anything probably played better than 2007. TT has never had a single "disaster at drafting" outside of Harrell who has no lack of talent, only health. The only people who expect the Packers to be worse in 2009 are fools and Thompson haters.
As for Peppers, who cares? We already have one all star defensive end converting to linebacker, why would we want to make a huge gamble on another one? I can't imagine 6'8" Peppers trying to cover a 5'10" running back in the flat.
Where would Peppers play in GB? If they are moving Kampman to the Willie in the 3-4, there's no place for Peppers, unless he plays LE, which I can't see him wanting to do.
The Packers have a lot of problems, but at least they aren't the Lions...
Milltown - Just have to say, we're still pretty far away. Thompson's first GB draft was pretty terrible, but it did net Rogers. Hawk has been an incredible disappointment, but at least we got Jennings in that draft. Last year's draft was simply ugly. This team needs an injection of talent. 6-10 isn't out of the question. I remember during the 4-12 season that GB has outscored its opponents very late into the season. That didn't make us any good, it just meant we scored alot when we played an inferior team.
milltown,
nice to see ari flesher's army still getting recruits. or is this just your latest moniker?
Thompson has yet to draft an adequate offensive lineman. The defensive line is a disaster excepting sherman holdovers Kampman and Jenkins.
The linebackers are pedestrian at best.
Wear the rose colored glasses if you like but Harris and Woodson ARE aging. Fact.
The team is pretty well set at receiver and QB but that's about it.
As a GM Thompson has earned a solid C- so far. The next couple of years will tell. unfortunately we'll have to go through those couple of years of mediocrity to get to the promised land. (post thompson)
Daryn Colledge, Jason Spitz, Josh Sitton. There you go, 3 adequate lineman TT has drafted. Plus 2 more with promise in Barbre and Giacomini.
Jolly and Pickett are both solid TT additions on the D-Line.
The linebackers were great in 2007 when they were healthy with a solid line in front of them.
The defensive backfield has gone from the biggest weakness on the defense to the biggest strength.
I agree, the next couple of years will tell, but despite the setbacks of 2008 I have seen the Packers steadily improving under TT.
Eric, TT's first draft also included Nick Collins, maybe the best Free Safety in the NFC. also promising WR Terrance Murphy broke his neck against Carolina, so that draft could have been stacked. Poppinga has been a solid role player, and Will Whiticker started, until we switched to the zone scheme.
And Miltown, I couldnt agree more, we suffered devasting injuries last year, and had a d-coordinator who can't spell blitz, and we were still 2 missed FG's from 8-8. this team isnt that far away at all.
Jax Max
ever hear of Jason Spitz and Darren Colledge, who was a pro bowl alternate. yeah they are really good. the problem was the age of the tackles, not the interior. also I seem to remember TT paying $20 million for Ryan Pickett, last I checked he was one of the better run pluggers in the league, and Johnny Jolly has been very solid, not much of a pass rusher but very good in the run game. also we are set at RB, Jackson performed well every chance he got last year and against Seattle in 07, and Ryan Grant had 1200 yards despite being injured ALL year! The offense is set(except a RT) for years to come, and the defense has a great coordinator and some very nice peices(Jenkins, Jolly, Kampman, Hawk, Barnett, Collins, Bigby, Williams) to build around.
The Pack have way too many holes to fill and since Ted won't use FA to fill them -he has to to hit on every draft. Ted struggles in the early rounds as the last 2 years will verify. What a joke last years 3 2nd round picks were and of course Mr. Harrell. He is solid in the later rounds but that only fills out the roster-GB needs defensive playmakers.
Eric from Manitowac: I appreciated your thoughtful post even though I disagree. I don't see Hawk as being a huge dissapointment, everyone wants their top 10 pick to be a pro bowler but it's an unrealistic expectation. Hawk had his worst year last year but he was also fighting injuries, he may never be an all-pro but he has talent and he is an above average linebacker.
I agree that the 2008 draft class was light on immediate impact players but it did have quite a few developmental picks with alot of promise in Thompson, Lee, as well as Giacomini and Finley who could challenge for starting jobs.
The Packers need a lot of help on D line and at Linebacker. All of the Packers Linebackers are mediocre and they are not play makers. I hope TT does not go OT with the first pick, but who knows what is going on in that "no free agent signing" brain of his.
I think overall they are better than their 6-10 record last year but they are not as good as the 13-3 record from 2 years ago would suggest.
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Fox’s future in Carolina is tied...
Both have problems, but playoff...
Raiders QB lacks motivation and...
The best defense is sometimes...
Bills new coach must embrace the...
Mar 17, 2009
05:09 PM
The Packers are a couple of injuries, old age at the corners and another disaster at drafting to be 3-13!Their name is not even mentioned by Peppers and they are going to be playing a 3-4 D. HMMM This could be a real disaster!