RSS

Notes From Lombardi: Where To Next?

Michael Lombardi

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This April 01, 2009, 05:15 PM EST
44 Comments

FROM MICHAEL LOMBARDI:

Where Jay Cutler will end up has been a continuing theme throughout the day.  Our own Matt Bowen gave an excellent account of all the teams that might be, and should be, involved.  This afternoon, I’d like to focus on the same theme but in a slightly different way. 

One thing to keep in mind, as I mentioned in the Diner this morning, is whom coach Josh McDaniels might want as his new quarterback.  Searching the landscape, I believe that Mark Sanchez could be his target, which I wrote this morning.  He resembles Matt Cassel in style and substance and has the smarts, the arm, the toughness and the decision-making ability to run the Patriots/Broncos offense.  McDaniels must have a target, and for me Sanchez fits the profile he would want in his quarterback. 

In one of my favorite movies, “The Godfather,” they use the term “going to the mattress,” which means there will be no end in sight until the business at hand is resolved.  Therefore, in the Jay Cutler Sweepstakes, some teams will be willing to “go to the mattress.” 

THE MATTRESS TEAMS...

New York Jets: The Jets fell in love with Brett Favre’s arm last year, and even their biggest fans (yes, that’s you, Yahoo Dave) feel they need a quarterback to keep competing with the Patriots and Dolphins.  The Jets had some interest in Cutler back in the draft, but clearly not enough to draft him at four when they selected D’Brickashaw Ferguson.  The Jets have a huge need, but they have very few assets to make them an attractive trading partner – and they don’t have a quarterback on the roster who would be to McDaniels’ liking.  The key to being able to make a trade for Cutler will center on who has the best way for McDaniels to get his “guy.”  Unless the Jets are willing to overpay, I can’t imagine they have enough ammunition to get a deal done.  However, it’s early, and the Jets have been willing to overpay before, so anything’s possible.  In addition, one thinks that history of trading for an established quarterback if he’s great is that you cannot overpay. 

Cleveland Browns: I know that everyone in Cleveland is in love with Brady Quinn, and Notre Dame coach Charlie Weiss has been solidly behind him, which may appeal to McDaniels.  Weiss can speak from authority on Quinn’s ability to run the Patriots’ offense -- if McDaniels trusts Weiss and his evaluation.  George Allen, the former Redskins coach had a great saying: “Evaluate the evaluator,” but that’s what we don’t know.  What does McDaniel think of Weiss’ evaluation of Quinn?  One thing that’s certain is that new Browns coach Eric Mangini is not sold on Quinn and is not convinced that he’s the Browns’ quarterback of the future -- a future that Mangini has been given the authority to control.  I think the reason the Browns have an advantage in this race is because they hold a very high pick that would allow McDaniels to get what he wants.  Mangini loved the big arm of Brett Favre last year, and he knows Cutler can make the same throws in the same style.  

Washington Redskins:  We all know that when Dan Snyder wants something, he’s willing to do whatever it takes to make it happen.  He’s a determined owner, and cost is never an issue, which would appeal to the Broncos.  The ‘Skins might believe in Jason Campbell as their quarterback today, but this is a risky belief at best.  Trading for Cutler would bring them a legitimate player, one who can transform the ‘Skins into Super Bowl contenders. Vinny Cerrato has a great relationship with former Broncos head coach Mike Shanahan, and I’m confident they’ve discussed Cutler in detail.  The ‘Skins are like the Jets, limited in assets to trade, and I don’t believe Campbell is someone McDaniels would want to build his team around.  However, the determination of Snyder is not to be overlooked, and the fact the Broncos would not have to play against Cutler very often makes Washington a viable option. 

Chicago Bears: For me, this is a no-brainer for the Bears.  They need a signature player, and they need a franchise player who can rejuvenate their offense and breathe life into the team.  But it’s not the Bears’ style to go to the mattress. It’s risky and it might backfire, but in reality, what options do they have?  I like Kyle Orton -- I really do -- but he has to be handled carefully, and the system defines his talents.  The Bears must be bold and understand that all the players on their team are instantly better once they improve the quarterback position.  It’s like having a playmaking point guard in basketball; he makes the other players much better.  If they continue down this path, the Bears will be a good team. But they’ll never be great team until they fix the QB situation. 

Comments

Add a Comment
Silky Johnson
Apr 01, 2009
05:30 PM

No Lions? I would love Cutler in the D, I might even go watch a game then.

Dana L
Apr 01, 2009
05:50 PM

No 49ers because Hill and Smith are not appealing enough to McDaniels?

Bill Parcells is my uncle
Apr 01, 2009
05:50 PM

Mike, I see many media outlets reporting that New York and Washington are potential players in a Cutler trade -

If my numbers are correct, Cutler is roughly a $7.5 million dollar cap hit this year -

So my question to you is - Who are these teams gonna release to create the cap room?

I can see Cleveland being a player in a Cutler deal - Along with Detroit and possibly Miami - All three teams have multiple (three) picks within the top 56 picks of the upcoming draft -

What do teams like the Jets, Washington and the Bears have to offer for Cutler?

Austin
Apr 01, 2009
05:57 PM

What if the QB McDaniels has in mind is not Sanchez? Any chance you'd look into who that may be, Mike? My guess would be David Garrard, who McDaniels watched go drive for drive with Brady in the playoffs two seasons ago. After the Jags O-line collapse of 2008, it sounds like they're entertaining the idea of finding their future QB in this draft. Why not try to send Garrard and their number 2 for Cutler?

TD
Apr 01, 2009
06:09 PM

Why not Cutler to Carolina for Peppers and a 3rd round pick? Takes care of problems for both teams and offers major upgrades for both teams. It's a win-win. Denver would have to draft a sliding QB or lower round prospect and perhaps pick up a veteran to compete with Simms, but in the absence of a trade that lands them a legit QB (Brady Quinn) as part of the package, this seems like a no-brainer.

Thomas Bonneau
Apr 01, 2009
06:11 PM

Cutler to Carolina for Peppers & Delhomme makes too much sense. Broncos get a premiere defender who wants to play 3-4. They send Cutler out of conference. And they get a short-term QB solution that would allow them to slowly brain along a Sanchez.

Panthers get a disgruntled Peppers off the books and get the young, legit QB to replace soon-to-be-journeyman Delhomme.

paulbip
Apr 01, 2009
06:21 PM

Why would Cutler want to play in Cleveland with Mangini as coach? He would have the same problem there. I'll bet that his agent has already told Clev. no.

s1rweeze
Apr 01, 2009
06:24 PM

So, so sad that the Vikings aren't even considering him.

Big Blue
Apr 01, 2009
06:34 PM

The Browns make the most sense as far as a QB to offer and a pick. Quinn will work perfectly in McDaniel's style.

That said, Cutler HAS to go to the Lions. How many more seasons of Calvin Johnson can you waste? How many more QB opportunities like this are going to come along for Detroit? Cutler to Johnson would be incredibly and a sign that the Lions are actually going to make an effort to build a winning team.

They need to do everything possible to make this happen.

Lance
Apr 01, 2009
06:37 PM

My bet is the SoCal Scorpions: gives him a chance to play with a winner and he'll have a lot of things in common with his teammates.

EddieMac
Apr 01, 2009
06:51 PM

I like your comments about the Bears. You forgot to mention that in an outdoor rough environment like Chicago you need a big arm quarterback.

No Tampa Bay? Odd. They are the number 1 team in this race IMO. Lots of cap room to make a deal and he would bring some bling to a fanchise that hasn't had much going since the Super Bowl year.

Oh, Mike .... why is no one talking about Cutler's roster bonus due next year and the year after. I saw someplace that Cutler is due 10M next year and another 12M in 2011. Seems like any team that takes him will have to deal with these bonuses or else release him to FA.

Altie Taylor
Apr 01, 2009
07:18 PM

"Going to the mattresses" in The Godfather meant going to war. This is hardly a war-like situation. Poor analogy.

Next 1 - 12 of 44 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)