RSS

The Impact Players: NFC East

In my continuing series on impact players for the 2009 season, I make a stop in the NFC East. Four teams and four players who will be expected to produce and play major roles when training camp kicks off in August. Matt Bowen

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This May 28, 2009, 12:27 PM EST
19 Comments

In my continuing series on impact players for the 2009 season, I make a stop in the NFC East. Four teams and four players who will be expected to produce and play major roles when training camp kicks off in August.

Click HERE to check out the AFC East Impact Players

The Impact Players: NFC East

Dallas: OLB Anthony Spencer

The Cowboys have all but closed the book on OLB Greg Ellis — he’s expected to be traded soon — and that leaves Spencer, the former first-round pick, to replace his production.

As our own Michael Lombardi wrote this morning, the Cowboys’ defense is predicated on getting to the quarterback. They led the NFL in sacks last season with 59, but they also gave up over 22 points per game. This defense — although nasty when it gets to the quarterback — is the equivalent of a big-play offense. It’s effective because it can provide the amount of pressure that can alter a ballgame — and that’s where Spencer comes in.

He has only 4½ sacks in his career and only posted 1½ in ’08. He’s long, but he lacks the burst off the line of scrimmage to consistently create havoc in the backfield, which is something Ellis will take with him along with his 77 career sacks and the eight he recorded last season. We can all agree that Ellis might be at the end of his career, but the Cowboys still have to replace his production, and Spencer needs to show that he can consistently get to the quarterback in this attacking defense — because without that, the Cowboys will struggle.

Philadelphia: LT Jason Peters

Beyond the fact that the Eagles paid top dollar — plus traded away draft picks — to bring Peters in from Buffalo, the expectations for him will, and should be, immense for the ’09 season.

Peters struggled in Buffalo last season, and now he comes to the NFC East, where he’ll face some of the best pass rushers in the game. The Eagles used their top two draft picks on offensive talent -- WR Jeremy Maclin of Mizzou and RB LeSean McCoy of Pittsburgh -- to give QB Donovan McNabb more weapons to work with. But those additions won’t matter if Peters doesn’t return to Pro Bowl form and become a dominant left tackle in the Eagles’ west coast system. I was a teammate of his in Buffalo, and I can attest to his athletic ability for a man his size, but he still has to prove that he can handle the pressure defenses of the East.

There were a lot of reasons why Peters’ game slipped in ’08, but when you command the type of salary he now possess, the Eagles and the city of Philadelphia are going to expect major production. This team should be considered one of the contenders to not only win the East, but to go deep into January — but that will only happen if Peters plays at a high level and gives McNabb time to throw.

New York: WR Hakeem Nicks

It isn’t often that a late first-round pick is expected to contribute and produce immediately in an offense — especially at the wide receiver position — but that’s exactly what the Giants were thinking when they drafted Nicks out of UNC.

As I wrote Wednesday when I discussed the Giants and QB Eli Manning, this offense needs a big, physical No. 1 target — especially in the intermediate passing game. Nicks is long, and he has the body to shield defenders away from the football, plus he has the ability to go up and catch the ball, something former Giants WR Plaxico Burress possessed — but he’s still a rookie wide receiver. Are the Giants asking too much?

Maybe, but that’s really not the point right now. This team is loaded on defense and along the offensive line, and it might just have the best running game in the league, but Nicks is going to be expected to produce and play like a veteran immediately — or Manning and the passing game will struggle early in the season. Say what you want about Manning, but he plays at a higher level when he has a big receiver who can go get the football. Nicks has to be that player.

Washington: RB Ladell Betts

As I’ve stated before when it comes to feature backs in the NFL, they tire over the course of a 16-game season when they don’t have a complement in the backfield. Clinton Portis is the feature attraction in the Redskins’ offense, but I felt that during the ’08 season he wore down as the season progressed, and I started to question why Betts wasn’t given more carries.

I have a lot of respect for the way Portis plays the game. I was his teammate for two seasons in Washington, and I still feel that he doesn’t get enough credit for his toughness as a football player. But it doesn’t hide that fact that Portis carried the football 342 times compared to Betts’ 61, and his numbers drastically decreased over the last two months of the season.

I agree that this offense has plenty of question marks along the offensive line, and some in quarterback Jason Campbell, but Portis is the real deal when he’s fresh and when he’s healthy down the stretch. Head coach Jim Zorn needs to work Betts into the rotation because he’s a back who can run with power, can catch the ball out of the backfield and is more than capable of moving the chains.

The Giants led the league is rushing for a reason — they had multiple options out of the backfield. And Washington needs to follow their plan for this offense to move the ball on the ground, something that’s essential to winning games in the NFC East.

Next: Impact Players in the AFC North

Comments

Add a Comment
Jack
May 28, 2009
01:07 PM

"Say what you want about Manning, but he plays at a higher level when he has a big receiver who can go get the football."

Isn't that true of anyone who has ever thrown a pass in the NFL?

Men of Troy
May 28, 2009
01:16 PM

Jack,

Not really if you look at what Brady has won with in the pre-Moss years in NE. No "big" WRs then

Northwoods Tom
May 28, 2009
01:26 PM

I still think Peters was the best off-season pick up in the entire league...

b roo
May 28, 2009
02:07 PM

Dallas also drafted OLBs Brandon Williams and Victor Butler. Williams led the Big 12 in sacks and Butler was second in sacks in the Pac 10 (13 and 12 sacks respectively). Between them and Spencer the Boys should be able to still bring heat on the other side from Ware.

Jack
May 28, 2009
02:25 PM

Men of Troy, you didn't happen to notice the one season Brady had Moss he:
A) Broke the single season TD record,
B) Set a new career high QB rating, 24 points above his previous best.
C) Led the pats offense that broke the single season scoring record.
D) Won his first MVP award.

Not that I want facts to get in the way of your argument or anything. Just curious if you... you know... watched professional football that year.

Men of Troy
May 28, 2009
02:34 PM

OK Jack, then I guess Brady's SB Wins without the big receivers don't count... Oh well.

Da Coach
May 28, 2009
02:35 PM

Always thought that Betts was one of the best back-up running backs in the game...

Firesalt
May 28, 2009
02:51 PM

Sooo, despite going 16-0 and setting passing records Brady did not play at a higher level, because the Giants beat them in the Super Bowl? That makes sense. I think I'll side with Jack on this one.

Stag
May 28, 2009
02:51 PM

Jack, it is usually true. But in addition to Brady, McNabb has had TERRIBLE receivers for over a decade and he has excelled. He didn't even have Deion Branch or Troy Brown, he had Pinkston, Thrash and Mitchell!!

Some QB's can excel in spite of a poor supporting cast. They can elevate those around them. Imagine if McNabb had Brady's old crew for 3-4 years?

Jack
May 28, 2009
03:15 PM

Men of Troy,
The statement I quoted is about the level of QB play, not the level of post-season success. I would never argue that a big WR who can catch anything correlates to post season success, because I think defensive play is much more predictive than offensive skill positions.

Dev
May 29, 2009
12:26 AM

Jack,

I know this is going old school, but Dan Marino and Brett Farve never really had great WR corps. Mark Duper wasn't bad, but he definately wasn't a dominate reciever. Also, when Brett won his three MVP's the best WR talent he had was Robert Brooks and Antonio Freeman, not dominate WR talents either.

Devo H.
May 29, 2009
01:19 PM

Whoah, ease up boys. Jack just said that any QB benefits from having a big WR to throw to. I don't think he was trying to imply that QBs can't succeed without one. Brady, Favre, Marino and McNabb have all had success without them but that doesn't mean that they didn't or wouldn't have benefited from having guys like Plax or Moss.

I will also say that I think that Plax was playing out of his mind on the Giants late run to the playoffs and the superbowl. That appeared to give Manning a lot of confidence that he didn't appear to have previous to that. I think that without Plax Manning is a run of the mill QB. He may turn into something special but at this point he needs that security blanket.

Next 1 - 12 of 19 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)