Is it time to panic in Denver, or are we all just blowing this situation between new coach Josh McDaniels and quarterback Jay Cutler out of proportion? The Broncos made some moves last weekend and almost made a very big move — one that might not be out of the question yet. Matt Bowen
Is it time to panic in Denver, or are we all just blowing this situation between new coach Josh McDaniels and quarterback Jay Cutler out of proportion? The Broncos made some moves last weekend and almost made a very big move — one that might not be out of the question yet.
What Happened with Cutler?
There’s never a dull moment when it comes to NFL franchise quarterbacks — especially when they’re involved in trade talks after a Pro Bowl season. This past weekend, the Broncos were in conversations to trade Cutler in a three-way deal that would have included Denver, the New England Patriots and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, according to CBS4Denver.com. The parameters of the deal would have sent Cutler to Tampa and brought Patriots quarterback Matt Cassel to the Broncos — and reunited him with McDaniels, his former offensive coordinator.

However, the deal lost steam and eventually fell apart when the Patriots decided to work out a trade that sent Patriots linebacker Mike Vrabel and Cassel to the Chiefs for a second round pick (No. 34 overall). So where does that leave Denver? And more importantly, where does it leave the relationship between Cutler and McDaniels?
Fractured for the time being — and maybe beyond.
Why Would Denver Trade Cutler?
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again as long as I cover the National Football League: Coaches want their own players. It’s a simple scenario that played out last weekend. McDaniels is coming to Denver with the Patriots’ offensive system — a west coast version of the shotgun. In his mind, he would feel a lot more comfortable going into offseason workouts and training camp knowing that Cassel would not only be under center, he would also already know the system and speak highly of it to teammates. The toughest thing for new coaches in the this league is the fear of player revolt when it comes to football-related matters — even down to the dress code on planes. If his offense begins to show signs of struggle in mini-camp, veteran players will start talking. Cassel would have provided McDaniels with proof that the system works — minus Laurence Maroney, Randy Moss and Wes Welker, of course.
I saw it during my career in the NFL many times. When a new coach comes in, he brings his guys with him -- assistant coaches and free agents. And the reality of the new regime is pretty cut and dry — no player is safe. When I was with the Redskins, new coach Joe Gibbs came in and cleaned house on both sides of the ball. Some of the players who had contributed the previous season were ushered out the door, and within a year, the face of the franchise, LaVar Arrington, was given his walking papers as well. Why? He didn’t fit the new defense we were running. As great a teammate as LaVar was -- and as great a football player -- there just wasn’t a place for him on that team. Thanks, but no thanks.

This is no different than McDaniels working the phones last weekend in hopes of getting Cassel in a Broncos uniform. By the time the second week of training camp roles around in August, I guarantee there will be some talk in that locker room. Whether it’s the length of practice, the style of practice, or even the amount of time they’re in the film room, the guys who are used to former coach Mike Shanahan’s regime will begin to grumble.
With Cassel, McDaniels would have had someone in his corner who could connect with the players, tell them that this way of football works. And it goes a long way when those words and actions come from your quarterback.
Plus, the guy can throw the football, while McDaniels goes into camp feeling comfortable that he’ll have the respect and attention of his players, especially the ones who wish that Shanahan was still around calling the shots.
Is Cutler Still on the Trading Block?
Absolutely.
Look, as much as we all want to believe the company line spit out by McDaniels that the deal is no longer going to happen, we should all know better. Those words are used every year in this league — straight off the assembly line. What McDaniels did by talking about that trade within earshot of any NFL club is equivalent to opening the floodgates.
Teams will continue to call, they’ll continue to make offers as the draft approaches, and teams will still believe that Jay Cutler is for sale. The New York Jets need a quarterback, and so do the Detroit Lions, who have plenty of draft picks to offer. Chris Simms was reportedly in Denver to talk with the Broncos today. And how can we forget about Tampa? The Bucs were a part of the original deal that fell through. Why would a club back away now, knowing that Denver indeed had Cutler on the block? If anything, teams will increase their offers because they have a feeling that McDaniels just might bite.

We should never listen to a coach or a general manager at this time of the year because there’s too much time, and too much opportunity, left before the first player is selected in April. Every player — including Cutler — in the Broncos locker room is expendable to a new coaching staff.
Where Does That Leave Cutler Now?
In the same spot he was before all this started.
As of today, Jay Cutler is the starting quarterback of the Denver Broncos. He is still a franchise quarterback and still one of the best young talents in the league.
Eventually, Cutler will meet with McDaniels and have one of those “talks.” There will be reports everywhere about their budding new relationship and desire to move forward and win a championship. However, the new guy in town just told the franchise quarterback that he doesn’t want him anymore. There was a better option out there — a more appealing option — and McDaniels didn’t have to tell Cutler what he felt about him as a player, because he showed him by dangling him like a carrot in front of a rabbit.
Sure, it will affect their relationship for as long as the two wear the same colors on Sundays — because players in this league are more sensitive than you think when it comes to their value to an organization. I don’t know what will come of this situation in the end, but I do know from my own experience that the last person you want to screw with is the quarterback — unless you have a back-up plan.
And maybe, just maybe, that’s exactly what the Broncos have.The sad thing is that Denver's O was not the problem last year it was the D. I can't believe that we are over hauling our O. Let's see what has come out in the past week or so.
-Almost traded Cutler for Cassel
-Signed 3 RBs
-Signed 2 WRs
-Shopping Tony Scheftler
-Singed a long snapper (w/1 million signing bonus, when Leach is on roster)
-Signed a 35 yr old Saftey
-Signed a 30 yr old Saftey
-Signed a CB Miami didn't want
-Signed a NT whose claim to fame is special teams (same as Niko last year)
-Signed a Browns Linebacker (Andra Davis)
Have I missed anything? How come all you NE fans didn't warn us about boy wonder?
What's a saftey?
Bad spelling
This whole thing gets made to look more sinister every day. It seems like only the mainstream national guys, like King and Schefter, bother to point out that Denver REJECTED the deal anymore. They point out that Denver was approached and not the other way around. Those are pretty important details...but they take the fun out of the story.
Its those details, I'm sure, that has Cutler being reasonable again.
as far as i'm concerned cutler is a proven commodity, and cassel is no more than a one hit wonder who is now in a new situation with new coaches and new receivers, not to mention a new system. He won't be the same in KC.
Cutler needs to get over himself. If McNabb can be benched and then lead his team to a conference champ game then crying about a supposed trade discussion is quite childish.
Drew T, I agree with what you're saying about the other teams approaching Denver, however is there any solid evidence for the reason the Broncos declined the trade?
I am of the opinion it wasn't a "No way are we trading Cutler!" and was probably more along the lines of "We're going to need a little more than that" or maybe even Belichick nixed it on his end? If that's the case we're not likely to hear a peep from New England and with the way it's exploded in Denver there's not likely to be much more heard from them either...
You're crazy man! You telling me that Shanny should have put Elway on the trade block when he took over so he could bring in his own guys? Come on. I get what you are saying and I think you are right, to a point, but there is no valid reason why any coach would try to get rid of a franchise quarterback who is 25 years old for a career back up who had one solid year since high school.
That would be like Norv Turner coming in when he did and putting Phillip Rivers or LT on the trade block his first year as coach...crazy man! Jay Cutler is a Bronco and Jay Cutler will remain a Bronco. Period.
Drew - the point of the issue is that the conversation even took place at all. It's not like a team called and their response was "No, we like our QB and don't want to talk" - they talked, they haggled. Yes, they shot it down but not until they considered the offer. If they were committed to Cutler, the conversation doesn't take place, period.
Ultimately the logic behind looking at the Cassell trade seems pretty simple to me.
For McDaniels, Cassell is a known quantity in the offense he wants to run - McDaniels knows he can do the job. Cutler, while talented and expected to be successful in the scheme, is not completely known by McDaniel.
For everyone else, its the opposite way round - Cutler has been seen more, and Cassel not much at all.
Its also my understanding that the Broncos weren't just getting Cassell in the deal? I'd have thought they'd get a pick of some sort as well. So you get a QB you know can handle the offense well, plus a pick to use on the Defense - sounds like a good way to upgrade the team to me from McDaniel's perspective, and ultimately thats how he'll be judged.
TPL-
Elway? What's wrong with you?
What Matt is saying is that McDamiels is a 32-year old coach who would feel more comfortable in his new town with his own guy at QB...
Also, the Cutler to Elway comparison is getting old. Check out the numbers. Cutler has a losing record as a starter.
Win a playoff game first son.
| powered by TheSeats.com |
Revis vs. Moss and Fortenbaugh...
Henne helps out, but Williams...
The NFP's Matt Bowen picks every...
Could this mark the end of the...
Bowen and Rosenberg discuss the...
Mar 04, 2009
06:34 PM
I don't see why McDaniels would like to bring in his own QB when he has somebody that made it to the Pro Bowl and proven to be a valuable player. Is Cassel that good or is Cutler just hype?