RSS

Time To Give Stafford The Ball

The early reports out of Detroit are good on Matthew Stafford, and it’s starting to look like the rookie from Georgia might be on the field earlier than expected, according to Peter King of SI.com. Today, I’m going to explain why Stafford should be under center on opening day. Matt Bowen

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This June 01, 2009, 12:21 PM EST
24 Comments

The early reports out of Detroit are good on Matthew Stafford, and it’s starting to look like the rookie from Georgia might be on the field earlier than expected, according to Peter King of SI.com. Today, I’m going to explain why Stafford should be under center on opening day.

The Rookie Dilemma

Should you play a rookie QB?

That seems to be the question every summer in the NFL. We throw around words like “development” and figure that the first-round picks will sit on the sidelines wearing visors while we watch veteran QBs struggle on the field.

According to King, Stafford has caught the eye of new head coach Jim Schwartz and could be playing on Sundays for the Lions by late October.

My question: Why wait so long? We all know that Daunte Culpepper is a deep-ball quarterback, but what else can we expect from him at this point in his career? He’s slow in the pocket, and although he possesses the big arm needed to succeed in offensive coordinator Scott Linehan’s vertical passing attack, I don’t see why he would actually be a better option than Stafford — who possesses a similar big arm.

Is there really a downside to playing Stafford this year? Do the Lions really want to play Culpepper again? I think it’s safe to say that Culpepper had his chances in the ’08 season, and the new coaching staff has to know what he can give this football team. Quarterbacks his age and with his injuries don’t suddenly turn their careers around in one offseason. The Lions know what they have in Culpepper, but why wait to see what they have in Stafford?

The Lions and Stafford

The Lions are rebuilding their franchise from the ground up. They spent a first-round pick on Stafford, Schwartz has to retool the entire defensive system, and outside of Calvin Johnson and RB Kevin Smith, the offense has some question marks. Why add another at the quarterback position?  

If Stafford is the best option, put him under center and let him play. Because sitting on the sideline with a clipboard and a visor isn’t going to make this team better. Sure, by playing a rookie we all know what you’re going to get — interceptions, some bad decisions and maybe some tough Sundays.

But in saying that, how is Culpepper any different? Trust me, this new coaching staff in Detroit has done its homework in the film room with the holdovers from the ’08 roster. They’re seeing the same thing we saw on TV last fall. Culpepper struggled, the team struggled and that’s why they used their No.1 pick on Stafford instead of an offensive tackle or a defensive player.

I fully understand that there are risks in any move made at the quarterback position, and I also understand that Matt Ryan of Atlanta and Joe Flacco of Baltimore had plenty more to work with in their rookie seasons last year, but I just don’t see the benefit of making Stafford sit — even until midseason — while the offense struggled under Culpepper.

There’s no time in Detroit to “protect” Stafford, and I guarantee that no one in the building is going to take this year as a loss while they wait for their future at quarterback to develop. The reason we’re seeing more rookie quarterbacks play — which should also happen with Mark Sanchez and the Jets — is because of exactly that. It’s a win-now league. Even in Detroit.

If Stafford shows he can outperform Culpepper this August, can take control of the huddle and does enough in preseason games, there’s no reason to force him to the sidelines.

Sure, the outlook for the Lions in early June is somewhat in question, but that doesn’t mean you sit on your hands and wait for the next season to play your young star. Give him the football and see what happens, because then you’re showing the rest of the league that you’re playing to win now — not waiting for the future.

Comments

Add a Comment
HopeSprings
Jun 01, 2009
12:44 PM

The biggest fear is that the line won't be prepared to protect this great investment and that a Brady-esque knee injury will sideline Stafford for 2009.

dan
Jun 01, 2009
01:01 PM

QBs tend to have more success if they get a couple years to sit first. Just ask Alex Smith and Aaron Rodgers.

Paul P
Jun 01, 2009
01:20 PM

Especially with Ryan playing the way he did last year, the Lions are going to need to put Stafford out there ASAP. This team needs a leader, and starting Culpepper under center is just going to be more of the same and not give a spark the huddle.

Smith and Rodgers were in different situations than Stafford, and there is a question if Culpepper is even going to be around in a couple years. Stafford seems ready and willing to dive headfirst into Detroit - the team should oblige, if he earns his spot.

Scott M.
Jun 01, 2009
01:23 PM

dan - actually, it can go both ways. Peyton didn't sit. A good argument can be made that Favre declined prior to getting on the field. McNabb didn't sit. And unlike the situation for Rodgers, what would Stafford actually have to gain by backing up a sub-par QB?

See, this is the quandry and the reason I didn't like the idea of them taking Stafford to begin with. He's not taking over an established offense, there's really no one for him to learn behind, the line is sketchy at best.

Having taken him, Matt is probably right that they'd be better off playing him now rather than waiting. Personally, I don't think it's gonna work but that's their best option at this point.

Romo4MVP
Jun 01, 2009
01:23 PM

Alex Smith? Someone tell me what kind of success--if any--he has had?

Lions need to go with Stafford just to have a chance to compete

Da Coach
Jun 01, 2009
01:36 PM

Might as well use your investment in Stafford... No point sitting millions on the bench and protecting him when Culpepper is throwing picks on the field...

Glenn
Jun 01, 2009
01:45 PM

I have never hidden my unyielding love for Matthew Stafford . I think he is going to be elite . That being said it really comes down to whether the O line can give him adequate time . The Lions aren't going to the playoffs this year . The risk is Stafford getting pummeled or injured . The reward is him gaining that valuable NFL experience . I say why not split the difference . Start him the second half of the season . So much money has been invested in him . Is it really wise to risk all that money when the franchise probably won't even be competitive next year .

Paul P
Jun 01, 2009
01:46 PM

Also, not to sound cynical but Stafford does have a huge variable in his favor: It can't get any worse. No matter what he does or how things bounce, if he scrapes together one win they are already in the green as far as progress. Period.

"Might as well use your investment in Stafford… No point sitting millions on the bench and protecting him when Culpepper is throwing picks on the field…"

That too.

b roo
Jun 01, 2009
01:48 PM

Aikman was thrown to the wolves right away. Who knows if his career was shortened by the beating he took that first year.

patspsycho
Jun 01, 2009
01:56 PM

Good article, and good point Paul P.

Unlike in any other NFL franchise.. there is no pressure on Stafford- because there is no expectation in Detroit that things will get better overnight.

Like Paul P. says, if they get one win, they are better than last year.

So it's not throwing him to the wolves, because he will not be under the pressure of answering to big expectations or upholding a proud tradition..

Makes no sense to have a transition period. Just put him in there and go. The sooner he gets through the trial by fire, the sooner Detroit can start building to his strengths.

Michael C.
Jun 01, 2009
02:51 PM

The Stafford pick wasn't too popular in Detroit. With that said, if Stafford starts the season under center, those same anti-Stafford-ites will be all over his mistakes from the start. However, if the Lions start the season with Daunte, by mid-season those anti-Stafford-ites will be ready for the Stafford era to begin. The season will already be lost, and Lions fan will be a little more lenient relieving a little pressure from Stafford. An ideal situation for a rookie QB to start his career.

Look at Ryan in Atlanta. The fans in ATL were starving for something new at the QB position. Ryan entered with little pressure his rookie season, allowing him to progress at his own speed.

Michael C.
Jun 01, 2009
03:03 PM

patspsycho-

You must not know Lions fans very well. There is pressure on Stafford. The pressure is to prove himself worthy of #1 pick. Those are big expectations. Even though the Lions don't win very often, Lions fan expects the team to win. Besides you don't think there is pressure on Stafford to be the savior of a city? Trust me, starting Stafford at the beginning of the season is throwing him to the wolves.

Next 1 - 12 of 24 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)