RSS

Tuesday Thoughts

Two of the greatest linebackers or our generation are there for the taking by any team in the National Football League. Ray Lewis is available as an unrestricted free agent, his contract with the Ravens having expired. Derrick Brooks is also available as a free agent, his contract having been terminated by the Buccaneers. Andrew Brandt

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This March 03, 2009, 11:12 AM EST
4 Comments

Two of the greatest linebackers or our generation are there for the taking by any team in the National Football League.  Ray Lewis is available as an unrestricted free agent, his contract with the Ravens having expired. Derrick Brooks is also available as a free agent, his contract having been terminated by the Buccaneers. Two of the indomitable forces of defensive football for over a decade sit at home as the phone rings for players of lesser stature.

The problem for Lewis and Brooks:  their birth dates, 1975 and 1973, respectively.   Age is an issue when it comes to large free-agent contracts.  Players usually hit the jackpot in their “sweet spot” years of 25, 26 or 27.  That’s when the second contract hits, overwhelmingly the biggest contract of a player’s career.  Lewis and Brooks have had a lot of contracts and made a lot of money; the next few days or weeks will determine what their next contract level will be. 

We’re hearing a lot at press conferences these days about how much a player truly wants to be part of the team, how much he loves the coaches, how much he loves the area. We may even hear the common refrain, “It wasn’t about the money.” Please.  True, there are rare exceptions where a relationship with a coach or a special circumstance will induce a player to take a reduced rate. But in the vast majority of cases, it’s all about the money.  No need not apologize for that.  Free agency was something the NFL Players Association fought over for years in trying to allow its members the opportunity to have multiple bidders.  Now they do, with bidding that creates inflated contracts, which is exactly what the players wanted.  No need to apologize for it. …

The missing boaters off the shores of Clearwater, Fla., have us all hoping for a miracle.  We are crossing fingers, toes and whatever else, praying for the recovery of the three missing people, two of them NFL players.  I remember being with the Packers at this time of year and receiving a call from someone on vacation in Cancun who saw one of our players bloodied and hospitalized after a jet-ski accident.  It was hard to believe because it was a random call from a stranger, but after further investigation, he was correct -- one of our best players narrowly escaped drastic consequences.  Although the present situation appears to involve players who are experienced in fishing these waters, it’s a time of year when teams have to trust their players with the idle time and disposable income they have.

We at the National Football Post continue to hold hope for the recovery of the men who are still missing.

Comments

Add a Comment
JtotheisOHN
Mar 03, 2009
04:46 PM

FIRST!

Man, I hate people that do that!

Scott
Mar 03, 2009
10:51 PM

Andrew
With the next CBA, do you see any changes that might allow some options for these older veterans to stay with their team rather than see them go to another team for the last 1 or 2 seasons. It seems like there would be so many positives for the NFL from an image standpoint and from the fan perspective to come up with a way to allow some kind of exemption where their salary is only partially counted against the cap say if you have 8 years or more with one team.

elliot cynamon
Mar 04, 2009
12:47 AM

andrew i am a die hard packer fan and i really cannot understand what happened with chris canty over the weekend.Could it really be possible that the packers were interested in his services and ted tompson would not even get on the phone with his agent? or that they couldnt meet with any fa until mon because they gave there coaches off?or why they couldnt tell the agent that if the meeting went well that they would match the giants offer, if that was their intention anyways?Its one thing if they were not interested in him but this just seems so amaturish to me.having worked for the packers i am dying for you insight thank you so much

jeff smith
Mar 04, 2009
01:36 PM

Tsquared inherited a team with some good playrmakers: favre, driver, kampman, barnett, harris, jenkins and two great starting tackles - the cupboard was not close to bare. His record is a losing one execpt for two years ago when Favre hoisted the team on his shoulders and singlehandedly carried it to the NFC championship game. Yet the Wisconsin press generally supports his work. perhaps the best Tsquared shills get the best access to team and coaches. Tsquared has a system that takes no risks and gets litte reward, his true record without Favre is a losing one. Odds are, the packers will be a solidly built mediocre team unless he can draft better than justin harrell and jordy nelson. impact players, no matter how you get them, win the tight games.

Next 1 - 4 of 4 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)