Why you can't take a poor angle vs. Bills' Jackson

Click here for the entire Inside the Playbook series.

This morning we took a look at Devin Hester’s 48-yard TD vs. the Vikings’ Cover 1 scheme, but let’s flip over to the run game and check out Fred Jackson. In the loss to the Giants on Sunday, the Bills’ RB broke an 80-yard run for a score vs. New York’s defensive sub package (playing Cover 1 or man-free).

Why did the defense break down? Check out the replay and then we will key in some poor technique from the Giants’ defense—because this run should haven't broke for an explosive gain.

- A quick point on personnel. Buffalo is in their “Houston” personnel (3 WR, 2 RB) in a "Pistol" alignment. A personnel grouping named after the Oilers’ old “Run and Shoot” offense. Why don’t we see it more in today’s NFL? The emergence of the TE position.

- The run action isn’t much different than looking at the “Counter OF” (guard pull, FB counter block) from the two-back look in Regular personnel (2 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB). Here, we see the down blocks from the open (weak) side OT and the counter action from the FB. Plays out like a “Wham” or a trap scheme on the DE.

- First mistake from the Giants is on the weak side fill. Check out safety Kenny Phillips. Working vs. the down block (and the counter action from the FB), Phillips has to “shoot” the gap and make a tackle. Instead, we see some hesitation—and that is all it takes for Jackson to get vertical up the field.

- The second issue for the Giants is the play of free safety Deon Grant. No question it is tough as a safety to square up a RB in the open field. However, you are coached to take a good angle to the ball (inside-out) and pick a side. Get the helmet across, put him on the ground and live to see the next play.

Give the credit to the Giants for winning this game and taking over first place in the NFC East, but this play is the perfect example of why you have to attack the line of scrimmage and take good angles to the ball vs. a game breaker like Jackson.

Follow me on Twitter: MattBowen41

Upcoming Games

Nov 29th, 1:00 PM

Carolina +3 -110

Minnesota -3 -110

@

Nov 29th, 1:00 PM

Tennessee +3 -120

Indianapolis -3 -120

@

Nov 29th, 1:00 PM

Arizona -2 -110

New England +2 -110

@

Nov 29th, 1:00 PM

Cleveland -7 -110

Jacksonville +7 -110

@

Nov 29th, 1:00 PM

Miami -6.5 -110

NY Jets +6.5 -110

@

Nov 29th, 1:00 PM

Las Vegas -3 +100

Atlanta +3 +100

@

Nov 29th, 1:00 PM

NY Giants -6 -110

Cincinnati +6 -110

@

Nov 29th, 1:00 PM

LA Chargers +4.5 -110

Buffalo -4.5 -110

@

Nov 29th, 4:05 PM

San Francisco +6.5 -110

LA Rams -6.5 -110

@

Nov 29th, 4:05 PM

New Orleans -6.5 -110

Denver +6.5 -110

@

Nov 29th, 4:25 PM

Kansas City -3.5 -110

Tampa Bay +3.5 -110

@

Nov 29th, 8:20 PM

Chicago +9.5 -110

Green Bay -9.5 -110

@

Nov 30th, 8:15 PM

Seattle -5.5 -110

Philadelphia +5.5 -110

@

Dec 1st, 8:00 PM

Baltimore +9 +103

Pittsburgh -9 +103

@

Dec 6th, 1:00 PM

Cleveland +4 -110

Tennessee -4 -110

@

Dec 6th, 1:00 PM

Indianapolis -3 -120

Houston +3 -120

@

Dec 6th, 1:00 PM

Detroit +5.5 -105

Chicago -5.5 -105

@

Dec 6th, 1:00 PM

Jacksonville +9.5 -115

Minnesota -9.5 -115

@

Dec 6th, 1:00 PM

Las Vegas -7.5 -110

NY Jets +7.5 -110

@

Dec 6th, 1:00 PM

New Orleans -3.5 -120

Atlanta +3.5 -120

@

Dec 6th, 1:00 PM

Washington +10.5 -110

Pittsburgh -10.5 -110

@

Dec 6th, 1:00 PM

Cincinnati +10.5 -110

Miami -10.5 -110

@

Dec 6th, 4:05 PM

NY Giants +7.5 -110

Seattle -7.5 -110

@

Dec 6th, 4:05 PM

LA Rams -1.5 -110

Arizona +1.5 -110

@

Dec 6th, 4:25 PM

New England +2.5 -110

LA Chargers -2.5 -110

@

Dec 6th, 4:25 PM

Philadelphia +7 -110

Green Bay -7 -110

@

Dec 6th, 8:20 PM

Denver +13 -110

Kansas City -13 -110

@