RSS

Packers defense comes under fire

Coaches, players dealing with adversity after Vikings loss. Matt Bowen

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This November 03, 2009, 03:38 PM EST
33 Comments

The Green Bay Packers and their defense are in a rough spot today. Questions are swirling about new defensive coordinator Dom Capers and his ability to put players in position to make plays. The unit gave up four TD passes to Brett Favre in his return to Lambeau Field on Sunday, and the Pack is sitting at 4-3.

People on the outside might see signs of panic, dissention and a team that looks on the verge of falling apart.

Cullen JenkinsAPPackers defensive lineman Cullen Jenkins vented his frustrations after the loss to Minnesota.

On Sunday, following the loss to Minnesota, DE Cullen Jenkins spoke up in the locker room, saying the defense was “handcuffed” by Capers’ scheme, and when players talk, people listen.

But I can tell you from my experience that immediately after a loss -- and that was a big loss for the Packers in terms of the Favre drama and, more important, the NFC North race -- emotions can get the best of you. As a player, you try to come up with the proper cliché that will float well in the morning papers or postgame blogs, but sometimes you just can’t help yourself.

The words come out, and the media is there waiting and ready to attack because, well, that’s their job.

But in an e-mail sent to the National Football Post yesterday by Packers cornerback Al Harris, the players are painting a different picture now.

“Look, not every family is perfect, and most are dysfunctional at times,” Harris wrote. “You might be seeing a little of that right now, however, we are family, we have to stick together and I and my teammates will support Dom, his system and all our coaches. We are all players and coaches in this fight together and have to share responsibility and blame. We are at war and will fight for each other. That’s how it’s going to be for the rest of this season.”

This shouldn’t come as a huge surprise because most teams in this league are resilient in that they seem to thrive off certain types of adversity. Personally, I think adversity of any kind is good for NFL teams. It brings them back down to earth, forces them to do more self-scouting and pushes them in the right direction. You evaluate the entire team and make the necessary changes. Good teams respond in these situations. And, right now, the Packers are stuck in the middle of some major adversity. Would the story be different if the Packers had found a way to extend that second half run? Of course it would, but that’s life in the NFL.

Al HarrisAPAl Harris says the Packers' players and coaches will stick together and "will fight for each other."

Winning always seems to cover up any issues, but losing — especially in a big game — without a doubt exposes all those issues, concerns and discomfort that exist in the locker room, the meeting rooms and on the field on Sundays.

Are we jumping ahead of ourselves and putting too much stock into a ballgame, one of 16 that the Packers play this season? And would it have been different if this was a loss to the Bengals, or any other NFC team besides the Vikings?

Most likely, but at this point in the season, it’s hard not to notice how much better this defense is playing under Capers compared with the downfall of 2008 — the reason Mike McCarthy went out and hired in Capers in the first place.

Here are the Packers’ 2009 numbers through seven games compared with their final defensive stats from last season:

2009                                                    2008

Total Defense: 4th (283.4)                  Total Defense: 20th (334.3)
Rush Defense: 9th (99.4)                    Rush Defense: 26th (131.6)
Pass Defense: 9th (184.0)                   Pass Defense: 12th (202.8)
Points Allowed: 9th (19.1)                  Points Allowed: 22nd (23.8)

An improvement? Of course, and we have to believe that the emotion behind this loss is the main culprit for the questions being thrown at both Capers and the players right now — because when your defense is ranked fourth, that scheme and personnel are getting some work done.

But I also understand that these new schemes take time. When Gregg Williams was hired in Washington by head coach Joe Gibbs, the results weren’t there immediately. But as the season progressed, the defense became the leading factor for that ball club – and for years beyond. It’s no different in Green Bay, so I can see why players and coaches can become frustrated, especially after another loss to Favre.

Sure, we can sit here and say the Packers as a team are at a crossroads, with the NFC North title most likely out of reach. But that doesn’t discount that this club, especially the defense, has the talent and the numbers to prove it can put together a run — a run that can get them into the postseason.

Losing highlights flaws, but a win this week and we’ll be telling a different story.

Check out the new Packers team page at the NFP — where the fans get to voice their opinions.

Follow me on Twitter: MattBowen41

Comments

Add a Comment
Prior Lake Penny Pincher
Nov 03, 2009
04:06 PM

I will say this...the Packers Rush defense is VASTLY improved this year from last. The only thing I can find that the Packers don't do well is get after the QB...only 12 sacks all year.

mickey
Nov 03, 2009
04:12 PM

Remember, when looking at Packer defensive stats for this season 3 of those 7 games were against the Rams, Lions, and Browns - and a 4th against the Bears when Cutler had a horrible game - comparatively look at the defensive stats against the Bengals and the 2 Viking games.

Northwoods Tom
Nov 03, 2009
04:15 PM

Pack will be back.... I think this defense will pick up and make plays down the stretch

jonnyblood
Nov 03, 2009
04:18 PM

The so called improvement couldn't have anything to do with the weak teams they have played could it? Detroit, Cleveland and St.Louis. Not actually Super bowl contenders. And this week they get that Tampa Bay powerhouse. When they play a decent team IE: Minnesota, they don't look so improved. Numbers can't be misleading!
Second half of the season they will be playing some better teams, then we'll see how much they actually have improved.

mickey
Nov 03, 2009
04:22 PM

Just read this from Tom Silverstein of the Milw. Journal Sentinel:

"Yes, the Packers rank tied for fourth in total defense (283.4 yards per game allowed), but if you took away performances against the horrible Detroit Lions and Cleveland Browns, the Packers would rank 21st (338 per game)."

That is one rank less than 2008.

Men of Troy
Nov 03, 2009
04:26 PM

Man, is every Packer fan on the ledge or what? I guess Detroit and Cleveland don't count, huh? You still have to show up and take care of business.... that is what playoff teams do.

Or is this season over because Favre beat you twice? Who cares, move on... Still have nine games to play. You guys sound like the players in the locker room after the Minny beat down.

Brandon
Nov 03, 2009
04:35 PM

so what if the Packers played the Rams, Lions and Browns? So did the Vikings. And the Packers shut them down better than the Vikings did.

The Packers defense has some work to do. But they are obviously much improved and one of the top overall units in the NFL right now. Every team in the NFL has played a few cupcake games and a few tough ones.

Give Capers a full year and another offseason to get the defense shaped and ready and you'll start seeing some huge returns. Remember that we've been building the defense for the 4-3 for years. May take a bit to find a few more 3-4 pieces.

Da Coach
Nov 03, 2009
04:36 PM

The Lions scored 27 on the Saints, 24 on the Bear, and 20 against the Steelers.

dan
Nov 03, 2009
04:50 PM

matt bowen comment earlier in Summer: "Cubs are going to the series DC." Niiiiiice.


with regards to my pack, we shall see how the D does for the rest of the season. You get your schedule, and you have to make the best of it. Both the offense and defense love playing bad teams and excel at it. I expect a Maddenesque game from Rodgers this weekend as he loves bad defenses but can't win against good ones.

Rodgers is 10-13 as a starter, and packer fans, please defend him because I am losing confidence that he can ever win the big game. As bad as the D was on Sunday and it was bad, the Pack still had a chance to win the game down by 4 at the Vikes 35, and Rodgers just falls short...time and time and time again

pacoweaz
Nov 03, 2009
05:08 PM

Dan, I'd give Rodgers another year to work that out. Part of it is the lack of pass blocking, part of it is the lack of running game. Rodgers does need to improve his decision making. But in the grand scheme of things, he's still a young QB.

I think he will improve more next season. And get him a decent LT and a running back capable of putting up yards the first half of the game and you'll see different results. Rodgers has the tools and the smarts to put it together. I think he just needs to settle down and have more confidence in himself.

Sean in GB
Nov 03, 2009
05:29 PM

I agree that much of this is frustration after losing to the Vikings twice, but there are some key players on this defense who don't seem to be a good fit for the 3-4. Cullen Jenkins is one of them. His pass-rushing skills are not being utilized in this defense. In a recent story in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel there was this quote from an NFL personnel man: "You're using a horse to do a mule's job. He's a good football player in the 3-4 and he's a very good football player in the 4-3." Mike McCarthy recently called Jenkins the best football player on the team, but they're not putting him in position to maximize his potential, in my opinion. The same holds true for Aaron Kampman. They're giving him more opportunities to rush with his hand down, but he still looks like a bad fit as a 3-4 OLB. Finally, they've used BJ Raji as a 3-4 end when he looks more like a pure 3-4 NT. I know his ankle has been a problem all year and Ryan Pickett has played well, but I'm guessing the Packers drafted Raji #9 overall to be a force in the middle, a la Casey Hampton, and will look for him to fill that role next year. I think the Packers still have work to do in finding the right pieces for the 3-4, and will make some more moves in the offseason.

dan
Nov 03, 2009
06:09 PM

They've got the talent and the scheme is fine. They should get better and better as the season moves along.

My concern is how this team fails to show up in games they need to win. There hasn't been a single "statement game" win in McCarthy's tenure. He's a good teacher, and he's designed a good offensive scheme, but he either needs to grow as a leader (and soon), or I'd be fine with firing him. Some people are better suited as coordinators than head coaches. There's no shame in that.

Look, I've always liked McCarthy, but I've lost faith that this team will ever show up when the lights are bright and the going gets tough. McCarthy's teams always, always come out soft and un-prepared in big games. I'm getting to the point where I've just seen enough.

Next 1 - 12 of 32 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)