RSS

Arrington Sounds Off

A few years later, in a game at Lambeau against the Redskins in October 2002, Arrington sacked Brett Favre, bringing him down with Favre's knee planted awkwardly. The knee buckled, Favre stayed on the ground, and you could hear a pin drop at Lambeau. Andrew Brandt

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This November 14, 2008
10 Comments

LaVar Arrington inserted himself in the news this week.  Arrington sounded off against a couple of his former bosses from the Redskins -- coach Joe Gibbs and owner Dan Snyder -- complaining that Gibbs just was making some money for his NASCAR team and that Snyder was a coward that would not look or talk directly to Arrington following their parting of ways.

Arrington was a name that literally and figuratively came through my career at the Packers a couple of times.  I started with the team in February 1999, a couple of months before Arrington was to be the 2nd pick in the NFL Draft.  He -- along with his teammate at Penn State, Courtney Brown -- was at the top of every conversation and ranking board for that Draft, a true blue chip prospect that was destined to be a Pro Bowl player.  Although we were picking 14th, a pick by which Arrington would be long gone, I remember Ron Wolf deciding one day to throw on some tape of Arrington, just for grins.  After about three minutes of watching Arrington run down every running back and quarterback he was playing, Wolf shouted out to stop the tape; it was too hard to watch knowing there was no shot at getting him.  He didn't want to tease himself any more.

A few years later, in a game at Lambeau against the Redskins in October 2002, Arrington sacked Brett Favre, bringing him down with Favre's knee planted awkwardly.  The knee buckled, Favre stayed on the ground, and you could hear a pin drop at Lambeau.  It was as if the President was shot; looks of wonder and horror filled the stands as the iron man quarterback was being carted off.  As it turned out, Brett had an LCL sprain that did not keep him from starting the next game, conveniently placed after a bye week.

Then, in 2006, Arrington actually became a potential player for the Packers.  As noted above, Arrington parted ways with the Redskins, foregoing bonus money for his freedom from what had become a fractured relationship.  Arrington, thus, was a free agent, and we at the Packers were interested.  Ironically, at the same time I was negotiating with Arrington and his agent, Kevin Poston, I was negotiating with Charles Woodson and his agent, Carl Poston.  The Poston brothers were holding the keys to the two parts we wanted for our defense that year.  And despite the fact that there was a limited marketplace for both players, the Postons did their best to create the impression that was not the case and demanded top-of-the-market prices for both.

As for LaVar, his visit to our offices did not help in our negotiations.  LaVar is a dynamic presence with great people skills and a full-of-life personality.  Our defensive coaches, who were initially skeptical about LaVar and his freelancing ways in a defensive scheme, were now sold; they had become smitten with this burst of energy that had come through our doors.  Coaches and management wanted LaVar, Brett Favre called him and I worked to make that happen.

In deciding between the Packers and the Giants, we were led to believe that it was even and LaVar would decide based on the economics of the offers presented.  As I later found out, our economics were far more substantial than that of the Giants (as was the offer from the Eagles) yet he signed with New York.  The lure of staying on the East coast and playing the Redskins twice a year was a pull that overcame our better offer, despite our being told that it would not.  Thus, we lost LaVar to the Giants, who then lost LaVar to injury in October 2006, half a season into a five-year deal.  We did, of course, make the deal with Charles Woodson and the other Poston brother.

The Arrington story again proves the adage that resonates time and time again in sports and beyond, although it is hard to take comfort in at the time a deal is unraveling: some of the best deals are the ones that aren't made!

Comments

Add a Comment
Sean
Nov 13, 2008
12:00 PM

I remember being disappointed that we didn't get Arrington, and having to "settle" for Woodson. Great job not getting that one done, Andrew!

Mr.Murder
Nov 13, 2008
12:02 PM

The Postons are royal pains in the @$$ of anyone trying to play a team to the cap.

Peter
Nov 13, 2008
01:46 PM

I remember hearing Aaron Kampman afterwards talking that he had lunch or dinner with Arrington, and he said that was the "most intense person" he'd ever met. In the end it worked out very well for the Packers. Woodson is one of the reasons that the secondary is the best in the NFL.

Zack in Santa Barbara
Nov 13, 2008
03:31 PM

Andrew-

I would love for you to talk about the Charles Woodson signing sometime. I've heard from him that he did NOT want to come to Green Bay, but no one else was all that interested so he had to. It has obviously worked out well for both parties, but I would love to hear about the challenges of getting him in.

Thanks for all the great insight, as usual.

Rodney
Nov 13, 2008
06:26 PM

Andrew-

I second Zack in Santa Barbara, I'd love to hear the story of Woodson coming to the Packers one day :)

Jerry in Texas
Nov 13, 2008
09:59 PM

I remember that year, and the buzz on the webposts to bring in Arrington. I still recalled the attempt to resurrect the career of Hardy Nickerson. But, to be honest, I was also dead-set against the deal for Woodson, because of his injury history, and his being more of a "name" than a player. Oh well- being half right would make me an immortal in baseball. Then again, if I was always wrong, it would make me GM of the Lions.

favrefromover
Nov 14, 2008
12:27 AM

I am sure the "challenges" of getting Woodson were:.. money, playing offense and offseason workouts....plus nobody else wanted him...

10-s partner
Nov 14, 2008
12:44 AM

You discussed Arrington, what were your thoughts on Woodson. Did he have the same personality as Arrington. He seems a bit reserved. I'd appreciate your thoughts on the two

Alex Coates
Nov 16, 2008
01:13 PM

Andrew,
Great comments and very interesting to be able to get your insight to the inner workings of that deal. As an Eagles fan, I have no love lost watching the Giants make a decision that didn't work out !! Glad that one fell in the favor of the Packers.

chaindale
Nov 17, 2008
11:56 AM

Andrew,

What would you estimate the probability is of selecting the right guy? I am trying to come up with a lucky versus good position for talent evalaution. For example, taking Brady in the 6th round I would classify as lucky. When you make a bust pick and look at it in hindsight do you ever pick up flaws in your analysis? Wondering if talent evaluation is similar to batting say 30% hits is good. Trying to see if there is some predictability. I am an eagle fan and trying to come up with an objective analysis of their drafting which overrall may not be good but westbrook and mcnabb were homeruns.

Dale

Next 1 - 10 of 10 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)
NFP Fantasy Draft Guide, Total Access pass and League - Buy Now