RSS

Diner morning news: Mangini’s big secret

Lack of trust keeps Browns coach from announcing QB starter (psst, it’s Quinn). Michael Lombardi

Bookmark and Share Print This Send This September 10, 2009, 10:29 AM EST
19 Comments

QUOTE: “By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” -- Confucius

Brady QuinnAPBrady Quinn winning the quarterback derby in Cleveland may be the worst-kept secret in sports.

One thing -- and it may be the only thing I’ve learned from Browns head coach Eric Mangini’s decision not to formally name a starting quarterback even as of this morning (we all know it’s Brady Quinn) -- is that he can keep a secret. Secret keeping is not going to earn him any points toward the playoffs or help him win the Super Bowl, but it might be the most childish act I’ve seen in my 20-plus years in the NFL. What good is it doing for the team? There’s no competitive advantage to this whatsoever.

When a head coach speaks to the media on a daily basis, he has three main audiences he’s addressing: the players in his locker room, the fans and the organization. He must be aware of all three each time he speaks, and he can send messages to each group. He can use the media as a tool to help his cause as the chief motivator of the team. I love watching NBA coach Larry Brown address the media after the game because he’s able to call out certain players without mentioning their names. His low-key style and matter-of-fact delivery are powerful tools in his motivational arsenal.

The head coach doesn’t have to tell fans team secrets, or what he really thinks, but he does have to sell his plan, his leadership skills and his ability to be in control of the team. Not answering questions, or being overtly coy, especially when talking about the quarterback position, sends a message of doubt, whether true or not, about the finality of the decision. All this secrecy has placed doubts in the minds of fans, players, ownership and organization. That doubt might promote the one reaction you want to avoid if the starter plays bad -- cries for the backup.

It’s not like Brady Quinn and Derek Anderson are so different that Leslie Frazier, the Minnesota Vikings’ defensive coordinator, would have to develop two different schemes. Frazier is going to run his scheme no matter whom they start. This is professional football, and the offense is not going to change significantly from one quarterback to another. Anderson is not going to run the option and Quinn the veer, or drop back. They are going to run their offense. Both quarterbacks struggle with accuracy issues, although one (Anderson) can throw the deep ball better while the other (Quinn) is more effective on the short and mid-level throws. By the way, my son Mick, who happens to love the Browns and Quinn, argues this point with me all the time.

So what’s Mangini trying to accomplish here? He’s a smart but shy man, and his lack of communication skills are legendary in NFL circles. When he was the head coach of the Jets, he would be in his office for hours, and staff members rarely saw him -- not just for days but for weeks at a time. Nothing has changed from his time with the Jets. Mangini is a hard worker and spends countless hours in his office working on many things that might not seem important to others but are very important to him. He’s not going to share his thoughts with anyone as he doesn’t trust people to keep a secret. It’s this lack of trust that prevents him from allowing the dialogue that’s needed with the right people to make the right choices. It takes discussion about the issues to decide on new ideas, new thoughts and maybe alternative solutions. Get smart people making decisions and you’ll make smart decisions. Exclude everyone and you’ll only get what you want. Somewhere along the line, Mangini will learn the difference between what is urgent and what is important.

Eric ManginiAPEric Mangini learned from the best secret-keeper in the business, Bill Belichick.

Last year, Patriots coach Bill Belichick, the man whom Mangini has modeled his secret-keeping after, had no problem announcing that Matt Cassel would be the new starter after the injury to Tom Brady. He sent home two prospective quarterback schedules for a workout the next day to send a message to Cassel and the team that he had faith in Cassel and wasn’t looking to replace him at any point. Belichick can keep a secret and can be evasive with the media, but he knows how to send a message to the team, which normally is a very clear and precise message using the media as his conduit.

What would have been so hard to come out and announce to the Cleveland faithful, along with not having to make Quinn lie in front of the cameras, that Quinn is the starter and here’s why he’s going to be the starter for the entire season, barring an injury? Send a message to the fans, to the team and the organization that promotes confidence in the choice. Use the media to communicate your message; the league doesn’t give away trophies for best secret-keeper.

I just don’t get it.

Today in the Tavern, I’ll talk about tonight’s Titans-Steelers season opener. Yes, the NFL is back, and you have to love that.

Follow me on Twitter: michaelombardi

Comments

Add a Comment
GC in DC
Sep 10, 2009
11:12 AM

I also wonder if it's because he has a big-time authority issue and needs to constantly remind his players he's in charge. Sure seemed that way when he loaded up the bus for his football camp in Connecticut.

This might be a bit far afield (though you seem to enjoy that) but Ron Chernow's book on Alexander Hamilton makes a great case for Hamilton being possibly the greatest subordinate (to Washington) ever, but tragically lousy as a principal. He was Washington's chief of staff during the Revolution, a key advisor, ally and surrogate for Washington through the Constitution, and then a fantastic Treasury Secretary (and, again, chief advisor) when Washington was President. But as soon as he lost Washington's leadership, things fell apart -- he was too headstrong, too personally ambitious, too insistent on winning every argument, big and small, and so determined to be right that he never learned from mistakes.

There are a lot of people like that, but Mangini seems to stand out among his colleagues (though it'll be interesting to see how Josh McDaniels' first full year goes). He seems only to have learned in NE what he wanted to learn, and so many of the non-Xs-and-Os things that people praise about Belichick (and please, no jokes here about cheating or video cameras, they're just so boring by now) seem to have been lost on him.

GC in DC
Sep 10, 2009
11:36 AM

I also wonder if it's because he has a big-time authority issue and needs to constantly remind his players he's in charge. Sure seemed that way when he loaded up the bus for his football camp in Connecticut.

This might be a bit far afield (though you seem to enjoy that) but Ron Chernow's book on Alexander Hamilton makes a great case for Hamilton being possibly the greatest subordinate (to Washington) ever, but tragically lousy as a principal. He was Washington's chief of staff during the Revolution, a key advisor, ally and surrogate for Washington through the Constitution, and then a fantastic Treasury Secretary (and, again, chief advisor) when Washington was President. But as soon as he lost Washington's leadership, things fell apart -- he was too headstrong, too personally ambitious, too insistent on winning every argument, big and small, and so determined to be right that he never learned from mistakes.

There are a lot of people like that, but Mangini seems to stand out among his colleagues (though it'll be interesting to see how Josh McDaniels' first full year goes). He seems only to have learned in NE what he wanted to learn, and so many of the non-Xs-and-Os things that people praise about Belichick (and please, no jokes here about cheating or video cameras, they're just so boring by now) seem to have been lost on him.

chris
Sep 10, 2009
11:42 AM

totally agree, all the secrecy in football is ridiculous.
we can have reporters embedded with the troops in Iraq but every little thing in football is guarded?
where are our priorities?

Greg
Sep 10, 2009
11:56 AM

What people never say is that Belichik GRADUALLY learned his behaviors and what gave him competitive advantage versus took away from his team's sense of certainty. He made his mistakes, both with management and players, and learned from it.

Mangini and others take their Patriots pedigree and think they can immediately re-create what took years to build in NE. You have to grow a culture in a franchise, not install it like a defensive package.

WCO
Sep 10, 2009
12:11 PM

I think you're missing the point here...I believe he's guaging the ability of his team/staff to see "IF" they can keep this small thing a secret...and obviously, they cannot...

damon in NH
Sep 10, 2009
12:15 PM

What is also forgotten about Belichik is that he was an assistant for 20 odd years prior to being a Head coach. Not the 10 that Mangini was or the 5 that McDaniels was.

Jason
Sep 10, 2009
01:00 PM

I think that the wierdest thing about the Bilichick coaching tree is how these guys all think they are soo impressive right away, whether it's Mangini, McDaniel or Weiss, these guys all think that they are hot stuff, but there has been little to show for their work to this point, except regression in all their programs.

I think they all understand where they want to get to, as far as the relationship they have with their team, but I think they also need to objectively evaluate where they are and what that relationship is currently. I think as they grow to understand their teams better and their players understand them better, I think you are afforded the ability to use these Bilichick-ian type tactics, but these types of moves soo early on and with such an important part of the team doesn't bode well for the future.

Brad James
Sep 10, 2009
01:39 PM

Nice assessments, Lombardi. Until Mangini makes it a priority to communicate more effectively he'll net more failures than successes. It's disingenuous to the team that he waited this long. Come what may, the Vikings' defense should dominate the line of scrimmage. Of course, the Browns still have a chance because Brett Favre is the quarterback. I look forward to tonight's game. GO BRONCOS!!!

yahoodave
Sep 10, 2009
02:57 PM

THe bellicheck coaching tree has been pretty awful, crennel, weis, mangini, mcdanials...

mark f
Sep 10, 2009
03:28 PM

WCO when you find the 53 person organization that can keep a secret let us know. Cripes you can get anonymous quotes from Navy Seals.

The Browns were always my 2nd favorite team and I cried when they hired this mess.

Quick can anyone tell me if he was for Farve in NY with the Jets? You can't cuz he left enough tracks that he was before the trade before he was against it.

He's a political creature. Mayor-gini. He doesn't take a stand...he stands everywhere.

Good luck with him Cleveland.

AirAl
Sep 10, 2009
04:09 PM

This is an overblown load of crap by the media. I watched most of the inane Romeo Crennell press conferences, and I can tell you that Mangini covers more information in one presser than Romeo did in three years worth. Not revealing depth chart and injury information prematurely is smart. Every coach, including Childress does it in one form or another. The DB competition this year went long enough that Mangini just extended it into some game time uncertainty for the Vikings to deal with. It kills me how these coaches are so incorrectly portrayed by the apparently envious media. Some fans eat this up for some reason. Maybe it's human nature to take a shot at the smart guy in class. Even Mangini said this wouldn't necessarily make a big difference... that it would just require that the vikings spend a little more time preparing which might take time away from something else. Antoine Winfield recently said that this would require him to view 30 minutes for tape in preparing for the game. That's not much, but it's proof that this DID have at least some impact. I see nothing unreasonable about it.

I'm surprised Lombardi is hanging Mangini out to dry for it. He apparently has an ax to grind with Mangini. Seriously? "The most childish act" he's seen in20 years? Sensational writing there, Mike. The Cassel example has nothing to do with this. Cassel was the #2 in NWE. Of course he was going to start. Also, no one knew anything about Cassel anyway so what good would hiding it do? This article is a pure hatchet job. There must be some reason for Lombardi to spew all this hearsay about Mangini. Why?

Gonzo
Sep 10, 2009
06:11 PM

I still wonder why Al Davis and the Raiders weren't mentioned by Lombardi this time...

TageRyche
Sep 10, 2009
07:16 PM

If Mangini truly learned from Belichick, he'd be far better here in Cleveland than he was with the Jets.

mark f
Sep 10, 2009
08:07 PM

"The Cassel example has nothing to do with this. Cassel was the #2 in NWE" This is not correct.

Cassel had a HORRIBLE training camp and was openly dissed by a national analyst. Pretty much every local media outlet was surprised he even made the team.

He came out and stunk his first couple games and Belichick was under intense pressure to bring in a veteran...make a trade...play the rookie...do anything but stick with Cassel.

Belichick was widely panned for being arrogant (as hard as it is to believe people called Belichick arrogant) by sticking with Cassel and openly declaring "he's my guy."

Lombardi's point is spot on in that Belichick went to every length to prop up Cassel and was, it seemed, the only person who believed in him.

Cassel was hanging by a string here, and you could make a strong case that it was the confidence that the coaching staff instilled in him, that gave him the traction to pull himself out of the hole.

It can be a fine line you know...this success failure thing. A very fine line. If Belichick had flinched; Cassel may have been out of the league. Instead he's a very rich starter.

Mangini should maybe worry more about spending 30 mts helping his QB by telling the world "he's our guy for better for worse" rather than worry about tricking Winfield (who by the way, I doubt will actually put in that 30 mts).

muundog
Sep 11, 2009
10:08 AM

I agree, must have a score to settle, Mangini left him out of the last big story or something ! 20 years please this just doesnt add up, trying to make a mountain out of a molehill !!!! Yes he has been trying to use it as an advantage know matter how small when you have the weaker team use do what you can within the rules and thats all he has done, no Biggy except for the press and a few impatient fans, It sure drew alot od attention ayyy,,,maybe he is smarter than you think Mr Lombardi , got you onboard ayyyyy !!!!!!!!!

yahoodave
Sep 11, 2009
12:00 PM

Airal...

If bellicheck has an ax to grind....lombardi will grind it....i mean..u want to talk childish..look at mcdaniels....but.lombardi would never knock because hes afraid of bellicheck

AirAl
Sep 11, 2009
12:43 PM

mark f, I disagree that it's a "spot on" comparison. Naming your backup after an injury to your starter is simply not the same as naming your starter for the season after a legitimate, thorough QB competition. You ignored my statement about how since no one knew anything about Cassel, that it didn't matter if BB announced it because Cassel was an unknown as were the other possible backups (O'Connell, Gutierez). Gutierez had been cut. O'Connell was a raw rookie. Also, Cassel had been Brady's backup for three seasons at that point. Belichick spilled the beans by putting Cassel in when Brady went down. The Jets knew it would be Cassel as did everyone else. There was no other logical choice. There was no mystery there other than the question of how Cassel would perform which was something no one could predict. It just is NOT comparable to this Mangini situation where there are two clear options.

How does telling the world that "he's our guy" help his QB prior to Game 1? More reps? Nah, both QB's got plenty of work from May on and too many reps give QB's dead arms. Ask Tim Couch. Too much pressure? Nah, competition is good. Now that Quinn is named (allegedly) Mangini will stick with him (per Mangini), so Quinn won't have to look over his shoulder unless he really starts playing poorly in which case a switch might be needed. Another side benefit of this QB competition is that we have a better prepared backup as a result. Quinn needs REAL game experience running this offense now, not practice time or vanilla pre-season game time. There's no substitute.

I'm just not buying why this issue of naming the QB late is so alarming to you guys... unless it's just Mangini hating. If that's the case, admit it.

AirAl
Sep 11, 2009
01:02 PM

yahoodave, I hadn't thought of that. The long arm of the hoody is strong. I didn't realize Lombardi cowered under it. It's a bit hypocritical, for Lombardi to go ape-$hit over Mangini's subterfuge when Belichick is the master at the same strategic paranoia. Selective disapproval at the very least.

The only thing Mangini can do to diffuse this hatred is to win so he can serve crow. That's a tall order with what he inherited, but it seems to me he's off to a good start. Adding 6 ex-Jets on D who all played active roles on a Jets D ranked 7th in the NFL against the run, to a Browns D ranked 14th against the pass should help if some young pass rushers also emerge. Consistent QB play will be critical for a still talented offense to rebound. A lot of big if's still here in Cleveland still though... which isn't the debate here.

Earl the Pearl
Sep 11, 2009
01:56 PM

Do you really think the team hasn't known for weeks Lombardi? I'm just some fan living 2 hours away from cleveland and I knew two weeks ago. One of my 'sources'(friend of a friend inside the organization) said that Mangini told the QB's Quinn was the man two weeks ago, and told the rest of the team that same day. Get a grip dude and stop trying to grind your issues out in your articles/blogs.

Next 1 - 19 of 19 Prev COMMENTS

Add a Comment

* Required - Keep track of your comments Login or Register with NFP
(will not be published)